Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Here's what's in the FC datalogit manual

E-3-1 Anti lag ☺ (AKA Stutter box, Launch box, Pro start and “Bang bang”) ^

• Spools up your turbo for a quick drag launch o Assuming you will use the standard clutch switch (+ arming switch) ? Cut clutch switch wires

? Connect one wire through an additional (arming) switch from the standard clutch switch to terminal “SW3” on the FC-Box {FC2 FC-Box 4 Switches} Questions? [email protected] 54

FC-Datalogit GTR32/33 DETT User Manual

• The additional switch is used to turn anti lag on and off (arm the system). Mount this within easy reach of your driving position

? Ground the other clutch switch wire

? Check the enable Anti lag Switch (SW3) “check box” to enable Anti lag

? Enter the amount of ignition retard you want in the “IGN Anti lag retard” text box

? Enter the amount of extra fuel you want in the “INJ Anti lag” text box

? Push the “Update” button on FC-Edit

? Turn the ignition key off and then back on

? Arm the system with the additional arming switch

? When the clutch is depressed the FC-Box will retard the ignition and add fuel to the values you have entered in the appropriate text boxes. RPMs will drop so you need to depress the accelerator to compensate. More boost will be created

? When the clutch is released the timing and fuel will return to normal

thaks maximajim,

but i thought "Antilag" which I believe Link ECU's have, is alittle different. I roughly remember reading how bad it is for the turbo life and exhausts.. I think the difference was "AntiLag" is activated straight from idle, where launch control & flat shift are induced by clutch switches, and "maybe - no expert here" are not as harmful as real "AntiLag"?

Say goodbye to your Cat converter and or motor

When you drop spark, raw fuel get's thrown through the exhaust, that pop that you hear when you get back on spark if the fuel igniting in the exhaust.....

When you drop power to your injectors, you drop fuel, big spike of detonation is possible as it leans out.  What if you miss a gear and have to clutch again......

Just a thought.

Yep, but the T-Sport one drops both at the same time. There is still some risk though. I am hoping someone else will give it crack and tell us it's all good :D

thaks maximajim,

but i thought "Antilag" which I believe Link ECU's have, is alittle different. I roughly remember reading how bad it is for the turbo life and exhausts.. I think the difference was "AntiLag" is activated straight from idle, where launch control & flat shift are induced by clutch switches, and "maybe - no expert here" are not as harmful as real "AntiLag"?

Another method of anti-lag hold back the spark until the exhaust stoke to explode through the turbo and out the exhuast. Certainly cat/O2 sensor frying risk there.

The original Anti-lag, ie, Rally bred, actually injected raw fuel into the exhaust housing and also had a spark plug in the exhaust. This kept the turbo spinning, but didn't effect the actual combustion in the engine.

The original Anti-lag, ie, Rally bred, actually injected raw fuel into the exhaust housing and also had a spark plug in the exhaust.  This kept the turbo spinning, but didn't effect the actual combustion in the engine.

Bj,

that sounds about right, from that thread I read from some US forum. I believe the car in question (need to find that mpeg) was a blue 01/02 WRX from Western Australia running a Link ECU with proper AntiLag (eg: from Idle.. the sounds ballastic). BUT, I don't want to confuse that sort of Anti Lag with Flat shifting, or maybe I'm just confusing myself.. :confused:

surely you could just have a switch on the clutch conected to the resistor pack that is only armed after say 50km/h (or maybe arm it only when the revs go above say 6000)

then it just cuts spark when you hit the clutch (might even works as anti lag with all the fuel flowing out the zorst)

im sure its not good for it but seems very simple to do

dont know why you would want it on a road car though

  • 4 months later...

Ok so out of interest, what real world performace gain is anyone getting out of this??? Because I sware if I nail a gear change I dont loss any boost, dont hear the bov go off car keeps going etc. Say if you were that worried about loosing the boost, dont have a BOV??? Wouldnt that basically do the same thing? Im just thinking out loud atm, so dont flame me, just correct me :(

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hey guys, I’m a veteran detailer with years of hands-on experience. I’ll be sharing quick, effective detailing tips to help you keep your Skyline (or any ride) looking its best. Got a question? Fire away!
    • I guess when I say it's a POS I mean.. the solution and the stuff has the capacity for maybe... 1 spot. You know, as a spot cleaner. What I really *want* is the ability to do an entire car, all upholstery, all carpet, mats, all seats, door card inserts, A pillars, roof liners, etc. In one go. I get lured by all the jank that comes out and think "I'd like to be able to clean to that degree"
    • I've got one (not the car one, the domestic spot cleaner one, which is basically the same jobbie) and have driven it hard for hours and hours at a time. Grimy sofas, 6' floor rugs, etc. I'd blame your specific example rather than the whole category. I haven't used mine in the car, because.... you know, it's my car. So there is no-one else's ball sweat in the driver's seat, there's no kid food/drink spills or hand prints inside because they've never had an opportunity to put them there. You know, basic, standard Skyline rules.
    • I normally run with I think a 10mm, and definitely use the second handle you can add to a drill. They hurt when they bins up!   For the crush tube, once all subframe is clear, I'd try some stilsons and see if I can get it to start to twist.
    • Probably because they couldn't, because the use of the variable resistor to create a "signal" in the ECU is managed by the ECU's circuitry. The only way that VDO could do it would be if they made a "smart" sensor that directly created the 0-5V signal itself. And that takes us back to the beginning. Well, in that case, you could do the crude digital (ie, binary, on or off) input that I mentioned before, to at least put a marker on the trace. If you pressed the button only at a series of known integer temperatures, say every 2°C from the start of your range of interest up to whatever you can manage, and you know what temperature the first press was at, then you'd have the voltage marked for all of those temperatures. And you can have more than one shot at it too. You can set the car up to get the oil hot (bypass oil coolers, mask off the air flow to oil coolers, and/or the radiator, to get the whole engine a bit hotter, then give it a bit of curry to get some measurements up near the top of the range.   On the subject of the formula for the data you provided, I did something different to Matt's approach, and got a slightly different linear formula, being Temp = -22.45*V + 118.32. Just a curve fit from Excel using all the points, instead of just throwing it through 2 points. A little more accurate, but not drastically different. Rsquared is only 0.9955 though, which is good but not great. If you could use higher order polynomials in the thingo, then a quadratic fit gives an excellent Rsquared of 0.9994. Temp = 2.1059*V^2 - 34.13*V + 133.27. The funny thing is, though, that I'd probably trust the linear fit more for extrapolation beyond the provided data. The quadratic might get a bit squirrely. Hang on, I'll use the formulae to extend the plots.... It's really big so you can see all the lines. I might have to say that I think I really still prefer the quadratic fit. It looks like the linear fit overstates the temperature in the middle of the input range, and would pretty solidly understate what the likely shape of the real curve would say at both ends.
×
×
  • Create New...