Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Been reading and surfing forums for months and am still completely undecided. Running a fully built rb26 with 260 poncams, headwork and a forced performance FP3582HTA .82 undivided rear. Goes seriously well and i get full go at around 4500rpm.. Thing is i have this 1.06 divided rear sitting at home and am itching to put it on. Tuner said not to but yea..

I am running a divided mani etc so it will complete the set with the divided rear. I dont want to lose response haha..

Wish there was a back to back comparison between the undivided .82 and divided 1.06 out there! Just cant seem to find the black and white info im looking for.


Yes im looking for more power without sacrificing too much response. Am going for a power check and slight tune touch up in the next month so really contemplating swapping this 1.06 divided rear in..


Anyone have some advice?

post-135751-0-36888800-1441868491_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/459602-3582-82-or-106-divided/
Share on other sites

Not a great angle on the gate, but if you aren't having boost control issues, I guess it will work ok.

I would usually expect a 200rpm later spool, the graph should look much the same, but no tapering off in the top end. Looks like yours barely tapers off, so I doubt you need it, unless you want to stop the torque falling away.

Decide where you want your power band, then make the decision. Most cars don't sit on 7000 revs often on the road.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • HFM BM57 has a "bad" knee point, IIRC. It's not the same thing as the later R chassis MC.
    • The ATTESSA is functionally identical to R34; there were a bunch of JDM models that continued ATTESSA including Fuga/Q70, Skyline/Q50, Cima etc as an option. All with Auto only and I think mostly for snow regions. AFAIK there were no AWD VR30DDTT sold in Australia - it is on my to do list to check regs for racing a LHD car in Targa/ATR/AASA/CAMS events because if I can get the auto to work it would be interesting to run a 4wd car The Ecuteck TCM tuning is the same model as their ECU tuning, they already have it for R35 and Dose's favourite, BMW. You buy "points" to allow your computer to be tuned, buy either a bluetooth (phone app) or bluetooth+USB+Key (phone and PC) dongle, and pay for a tune that will be locked to your tuner ( ). You can also access the tuning software yourself but 1. it is mega expensive and 2. these computers have a billion parameters that intersect, so how could you ever spend enough time on it to get a decent result.
    • Or, is it a case of what it is like owning an R series Skyline? NFI what the previous owner has done or fiddled with... Ha ha ha After reading through this thread, I went on a bit of a research about the Q50/Q60. Now I'm quite intrigued by them! Is the AWD in them more like a WRX where it's always AWD, or is it more like the ATTESSA in the GTRs? By the sound of this TCU tuning, this sounds like a case of someone has made some real software for it, and you just need the right piece of hardware, and then you license that specific vehicle/TCU. Or is this a case of the software will be really expensive so only a few tuners have it, and you still have to pay a license per vehicle?
    • By popular demand.. it was a coil. Got my hands on 1 new OEM coil, replaced with the one that made the less noise difference when I unplugged it while the car was running and started the car up. No stutter and the engine light was gone. I guess I’ll buy the other 5 they have lol
    • No, code 21 is very straightforward. It can only be the things described in that diagnostic flow. In fact it has no way of knowing that the spark plug resistance is out of spec.
×
×
  • Create New...