Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I noticed one thing, you have a SARD FPR... those things aren't that good.

I replaced my SARD FPR with a Turbosmart 1200 FPR and AFRs were more steady on WOT and also my fuel map could be smoothed out

So word from tuner is pump will be fine going to see if he can get some good midrange gains and whatever it makes up top will be conservative hoping for 30-40 kw from 3800 up and maybe peak of 360

Postponed till Tuesday Wednesday .

My running issue was a hole in my intercooler wonder why it was bit laggy lol

so purchasing a cooling pro intercooler for now,

They also managed to rewire my fuel pumps to get me 13.3V at the pumps.

Only changes were a colling pro intercooler instead of greddy one and type r exhaust not a straight through.

Fpr also started play up and injectors almost out

Only changes were a colling pro intercooler instead of greddy one and type r exhaust not a straight through.

Fpr also started play up and injectors almost out

:)

didn't I say the SARD FPR isn't that good?

I doubt the injectors are nearly out.. it's because your fuel pressure is all over the shop up top. I found that when I changed my FPR I ended up with richer mixtures and needed to fix up my VE table.

Yes yes you did bit dissapointing from a genuine jap item. Will replace as soon as i have cash.They offerrd to clean the tune up ounce i fit a new one up.

Not almost but getting on the higer end but plenty left in them for now.

General appearance is that you've picked up 30-40kW from 3000-7400 using marginally less boost. But the peak power number is roughly similar despite the gain right through the range.

How is it that the boost curve comes on at lower rpm?

The power throught the curve is so very noticable as is the added response i cant answer how it come on earlier but its certianly noticable.

The peak power is about the same but how often do u rev above 7200 . Beleive its the same due to exhaust restriction and it has very little timing as my motor has god oddly low but even comp so wanted to stay conservative

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I've got the rear ones, they're certainly beefy. I need to take them to my driveshaft guru to check over, he's very fussy about the quality of components so I'll let you know if they are made of cheese by a blind man.   Are you in Australia? A mate just had a set of EN26 shafts made for his K20 Lotus by our fabricator which were quite cheap (compared to Driveshaft Shop) so if you can procure the CV's and draw what you need he'd make them for ~$800 for the pair.
    • Had I known the diff between R32 and R33 suspension I would have R33 suspension. That ship has sailed so I'm doing my best to replicate a drop spindle without spending $4k on a Billet one.
    • OEM suspension starts to bind as soon as the car gets away from stock height. I locked in the caster and camber before cutting off the kingpin. I then let the upright down in a natural (unbound) state before re-attaching it. Now it moves freely in bump and droop relative to the new ride height. My plan is to add GKTech arms before the car is finished so I can dial camber and caster further. It will be fine. This isn't rocket science. Caster looks good, camber is good, upper arm doesn't cause crazy gain and it is now closer to the stock angle and bump steer checks out. Send it.
    • Pay careful attention to the kinematics of that upper arm. The bloody things don't work properly even on a normal stock height R32. Nissan really screwed the pooch on that one. The fixes have included changing the hole locations on the bracket to change the angle of the inner pivot (which was fairly successful but usually makes it impossible to install or remove the arm without unbolting the bracket from the tower, which sucks) and various swivelling upper arm designs. ALL the swivelling upper arm designs that look like a capital I (with serifs) suck. All of them. Some of them are in fact terribly unsafe. Even the best one of them (the old UAS design) shat itself in short order on my car. The only upper arm that works as advertised and is pretty safe is the GKTech one. But it is high maintenance on a street car. I'm guessing that a 600HP car as (stupidly, IMO) low as you are going is not going to be a regular driver. So the maintenance issues on suspension parts are probably not going to be a problem. But you really must make sure that however your fairly drastically modded suspension ends up, that the upper arms swing through an arc that wants to keep the inner and outer bolts parallel. If the outer end travels through an arc that makes that end's bolt want to skew away from parallel with the inner bolt, you will build up enormous binding and compressing forces in the bushes, chew them out and hate life. The suspension compliance can actually be dominated by the bush binding, not the spring rate! It may be the case that even something like the GKTech arm won't work if your suspension kinematics become too weird, courtesy of all the cut and shut going on. Although you at least say there's no binding now, so maybe you're OK. Seeing as you're in the build phase, you could consider using R33/4 type upper arms (either that actual arm, OEM or aftermarket) or any similar wishbone designed to suit your available space, so alleviate the silliness of the R32 design. Then you can locate your inner pivots to provide the correct kinematics (camber gain on compression, etc).
    • The frontend wouldn't go low enough because the coilover was max low and the upper control arm would collapse into itself and potentially bottom out in the strut tower. I made a brace and cut off the kingpin and then moved the upright down 1.25" and welded. i still have to finish but this gives an idea. Now I can have a normal 3.25" of shock travel and things aren't binding. I'm also dropping the lower arm and tie rod 1.25".
×
×
  • Create New...