Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

ok just changed the rear cradle on a s2 rwd auto stagea to the narrower s14 cradle

i have adjustable camber arms in

toe is -15mm on both sides, i need longer toe arms

i was told that when i got adjustable toe arms to also get traction arms

car is not overly low

question is, do i really need to get traction arms?

was going to run a street set up from this:

http://www.nissansilvia.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=317341&view=findpost&p=4301102

ie:

Recommended Road Settings
Front
Caster = 7 degrees positive (slightly more on the LHS to counter the drift to the gutter)
Camber = 1.25 to 1.5 degrees negative
Toe = Zero

Rear
Camber = 0.75 to 1.25 degrees negative
Toe = In 2 mm each side

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/461371-when-are-traction-arms-needed/
Share on other sites

traction arms are always needed otherwise your car will crash to the ground. HA. HA.

adjustable ones help with reducing bump steer when you lower the car, so you need them if you have noticed a bump steer problem and want to spend some time on an alignment hoist dialling it out.

or, you could just chuck them in, adjust them to % of stock length based on how much you shortened the camber arm by and feel like it improved things like most people do

  • Like 1

What's 'not overly low' more specifically?

If you drop the car from standard heights to anything more decent it's probably lowered an inch or more, and you might want to change the traction arms too. eBay arms are <$100, you'll spend more than that in one proper alignment.

You can definitely run without, I did for years. Putting in adjustable traction arms did help with bump steer a little, however the main culprit turned out to be a busted shock on one side.

No fking way you would drive it with 15mm toe out per side. I presume you still have the standard eccentric bushes but no way can they get that much adjustment. You will scrub out your tyres in a few hundred km if you drive it in the current state.

Sorry haha, was late and I obviously wasn't reading correctly.

I don't know how advantageous it would be running aftermarket traction arms in a street car. Personally I would but if you track it sometimes and are semi-serious about it, then it's probably worthwhile.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...