Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi, hoping someone can help me.

I'm having some trouble with the harmonic damper on my rb26, the motor is in an unmodified s13 chassis so it is a reasonably tight squeeze. I am running a rb25 ps pump and rb25 ps bracket, so the normal GTR harmonic dampers will not line up (10mm too long). The rb25 (r33) damper is a perfect fit, but as I haven't run a 26 with a 25 damper before I am a little worried, theoretically it is only a damper and the crank is internally balanced so it should work fine. Has anyone had to do this before? The car is solely used for track so it sees big revs consistently. If I run the gtr balancer, pump and bracket it will Run extremely close to the radiator. (not ideal).

I have tried to sort this out with a very reputable workshop in Sydney but Ive found Ive been ripped a new one for parts, the particular employee couldnt even keep up with his own lies and now I am $1000 out of pocket and no harmonic damper.

As you can imagine after being stung badly by a company that is supposedly the rb gurus in Sydney, I find myself questioning any info I've been given. And what's probably an easy fix has me sweating bullets.

Any info on this would be greatly appreciated.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/463685-harmonic-damper/
Share on other sites

As far as I'm aware the main differences between RB balancers is the belt setup. So by that theory using a 25 balancer with 25 ancillaries should be fine. The key ways and everything else will be fine.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/463685-harmonic-damper/#findComment-7698906
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply, I got onto Ross balancers today and they had no worries with the rb25 balancer on the 26. Going to go for their gold series as it's the best they make for race application. Hopefully the final piece of the puzzle. What was a routine freshen up turned into an 8 week adventure due to 1 incompetent pleb who I really want to name but I am still trying to get my $1000 back. So for the moment the workshop will remain nameless. But a quick search on this forum confirms I'm not the only one.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/463685-harmonic-damper/#findComment-7699402
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...