Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

RB25 / Z32 gearbox hybrid

Hey all,

 

Basic run down. RB20 in an S15. Currently have a RB25 det gearbox but all the info on the net tells me that the gearbox shifter will not line up with the body of the car, it will sit significantly further forward. AlphaOmega make a kit to convert standard SR box to the bigger RB25 gearbox but it includes and adapter plate as it was designed to keep the SR20.

Basically my plan is as such, RB20 -> RB25 bellhousing -> RB25 gearset -> Z32 rear gbox half with remote shifter

This should align the shifter in the correct postition. All my reading on the net suggests that the RB/VG bellhousing should swap straight over. 

If someone chimes in and lets me know that the 25box fits perfect into an S15 i will be very happy haha

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/466564-rb25-z32-gearbox-hybrid/
Share on other sites

Hey mate,

 

In my S14 I have an RB25 bellhousing, cut/shut with SR20 front, on a Z32 gearbox. Boom! 

 

The Z32 shifter lines up much better, at best you will need to clearance the shifter hole a few mm. 

 

The RB25 box requires a ~70mm half circle to be cut out of the front of the shifter hole, then you need a big dogleg shifter and it's not good.


Feel free to PM me for more info.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...