Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hello all,

Just wondering what is the difference between the C34 and C35? The only noticable change I can see is the engine its type, triptronic gears, different external styling. Does anyone know more?

Or if you have a url that compares the two would be great too.. ;)

Last questions is has anyone attempted putting a half cut C35 into a C34 ? Can it be done? If so what type of difficulty would there likely to be?

Cheers,

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/46910-difference-between-c35-and-c34/
Share on other sites

What is a C35?

I like the newer looking style of the M35, especially with the a nice kit. Yes, styling and engine are different...they use a VQ25DD, VQ25DET and VQ30DD, all are 5AT.

And for those who want a manual there is the limited Autech Axis 350S uses a VQ35DE with a 6MT.

Why bother swapping, unless you want the VQ25DET!

2003 Stagea 4WD 250T RS-4 V NM35 2500 pearl AC AW PS PW Grade 5 Start price 1950

Is what we want to bring in, cant for 18 months after manufacture then we have to wait for price to be low enough that people will hand the money over.

You also have to look at how many come up at the auctions when deciding what to do.

It is SEVS eligabe but somebody has to apply for it to be on the list.

After EVO 6,7 and 8, IS 200 wagon 3 litre 4WD and the campers V35 Skyline the NM35 may be looked at, it cost's so much to get compliance on models you will sell it takes a big set of balls to do a car that hasent tested the water.

Look why would you do the PRIUS when a battery costs $7000, a lot goes into deciding what to do.

I want it on our list but you dont want too many cars as $1,500 per model per year to DOTRS and evidence costs for each model.

You want to do 20 to 25 of each model to make worth while so you may do only 4 models so you have to look at what is long term and give best return with out having to charge $7,000 plus for compliance.

These averages are off Japanese dealers site.

2001 Stagea 250RX M35 2500 17 FA Silver AC AW PS PW 4.5 average sale price of 1,846,000yen

Landed say around $34,000 plus compliance.

2002 Stagea access HM35 3000 24 FA pearl AC AW TV leather PS PW 5 average sale price of 2,100,000yen

Landed say around $38,000 plus compliance.

2001 Stagea 300RX HM35 3000 12 FA Silver AC AW TV leather PS PW 5 average sale price of 2,000,000yen

Landed say around $38,000 plus compliance.

This is a good Russian site that tels sale prices on cars and also gives very good run down on all Japanese cars including fitment of side intrusion bars for 15 year old boys http://english.auto.vl.ru/

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...