Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Well, had fun yesterday and trying to work out what caused it. Going round the rounadabout near adfa onto Monaro H'Way in the wet, doing about 20 or 30kph, accelerated out like a granny and the rearend just stepped out and kept me spinning to the right. Managed to catch it in time, corrected and came to a stop facing back to the left and the right way for heading up the h'way before getting into the way of oncoming traffic but got me wondering what I did wrong.

Since I haven't driven a rwd or an lsd car for about 15 year I think it might just be needing to readjust to the handling, and checking if the tyres are running low on tread, but thought I'd see if this might be a common issue in the wet that just needs awareness of or if it might be a handling issue.....or if I just screwed up :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/47068-first-lose/
Share on other sites

yeah what nick said, im the same, my fronts are low on tread and i have to be very carefull cornering in the wet, except it always trys to understeer not oversteer. but as long as im carefull and slow it holds fine, not exactly a smart idea on my part driving on low fronts though.

you'll get used to it though, and you'll know its limits in the wet.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/47068-first-lose/#findComment-952439
Share on other sites

I had some slips in the rain when I first got my car, came from a FWD. Also if it hasn't rained for a while the roads are very greasy but this washes away once it's been raining for a bit, like all day kind of thing.

You do get used to it though, I always turn Traction Control off an dhave no problems.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/47068-first-lose/#findComment-952450
Share on other sites

r33's have crap diffs, they open wheel offen then go to and fro into 2 wheel slip which can be hard to cantrol and very unpredictable and quick to step out... if you find this is the case i recommend a mechanical 1.5 locked lsd she'll do exactly the same thing everytime!!!!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/47068-first-lose/#findComment-952497
Share on other sites

yea happened to me only last weekend but not on a around about this was just coming out of a sharpish corner scared the bagesus out of me and i wasnt being a tool either. the learning process for me is pretty high but i think i have a pretty good idea now of its basic limitations. plus i intend on going to a skidpan to find out what its really like.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/47068-first-lose/#findComment-953202
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...