Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

well accord to nismo the original balancer (12303-05U01) is no longer available, but they are making a replacement 12303-RHR20 for a very reasonable 42000 yen.

http://www.nismo.co.jp/heritage_parts/

bolt is 12309-05u00 and big washer under it is 12308-05U00

  • Thanks 1

I'm pretty sure Vspec  had the same crank as base GTRs. They all changed sometime around 94 to long drive for the oil pump but that was not Vspec only, and they are interchangable. Does your 93 have a long oil pump drive?

I can double check if the crank is different if you want, either post or pm me your VIN number.  The crank part number for my 91 non vspec 32 gtr is 12200-05U01. FAST shows 12200-05U02 and 12200-05U03 are alternate part numbers (ie interchangeable) but there is no description of the the change.

In any case, the long oil pump drive does not change any of the parts around. It just engages more of the oil pump rotor.

  • Thanks 1

Yeah that's the number. Australia adds a whole bunch of stuff to the front but BNR32-303809 is your japanese VIN. It comes up with 12200-05U02 for the crank so it is different to my earlier car, but not necessarily because it's a Vspec.  As I said earlier 12200-05U03 superseeds both of them so whatever the difference is they are all compatible.

In any case...the part numbers I posted above for the balancer, bolt and washer should be fine. What happened that you need them?

  • Thanks 1

Personally I wouldn't hesitate to reuse the bolt and washer, I've reused them many times. Seems like a good idea to replace the balancer as they have bonded rubber and would be feeling their age by now.

When you do the timing belt you should definitely change the stud for the timing belt idler bearing, they have been known to break, as well as the idler and tensioner bearing of course. And the cam and crank oil seals. And the water pump.

 

  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...