Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ok I have a few questions and thoughts that have been bugging me.

if you have something to contribute please do.

Firstly... Why is it better to have a thicker intercooler core?

my current intercooler is 600x270x55 core.

I think this is going to be too restrictive if i am trying to make 450+Hp @ wheels.

I was then thinking with a 76mm thick core air flow would be pretty good as you have 3" inlet/outlets... 2.5" inlet piping and 3" outlet piping. Therefore the intercooler isnt really a restriction in terms of size.

How does a thicker core help with intercooler? and would it really matter for a street driven car with the occasional drag track work out?

The "hybrid" intercoolers @ 600x300x76. Someone selling these has said they are rated at supporting 500-600hp. But I have checked places such as ARE who rate a cooler that size at supporting ~250-270rwkw (well below 500-600hp).

So who is trying to sell me on their product? the supplier with a mass of cheap intercoolers... or the company wanting me to spend $$ on a larger cooler?

Reason why i am tryin to find out is my current intercooler is only 55mm thick and has a taken a nice hit in the front from a concrete block. It still works fine, but i want to be using the best, and dont want to be inhibited by a poor intercooler, when i put the RB30DET, GT35 + 20psi boost through it when i aim for 450-500hp.

if that made any sense, post ya thoughts :headspin:

:rofl: All

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/47476-intercooler-tech-101/
Share on other sites

not sure if the helps but the stock r33 gtr intercooler is good for 300rwkw os find out what core/size it is and maybe use that a reference point, theres heaps of people who would know the answers to this just not sure if they will reply or not

quite literally bigger is better because there is more metal.... More alloy means more to heat up thus the cooler is more efficient as it has a greater surface area and mass!! Simple in your house the tap furthest away from the hot water usually takes the longest to get hot 1 becuase it has to push all the cold water out but 2 because the pipes take longer to heat cuase they are longer!!!

Internall design effects flow rates significantly perhaps the fins are smaller inside the tubing on the hybrid units which means more flow but less mass!!!!

nice explanation Daniel!

I think a GTR cooler is ~600x300x76 in dimensions. But for all intents and purposes we'll say it is.

How can you say a cooler is inefficient at xxxxKw's ? what are the tell-tale signs?

I've got a few options, which may also temp other people:

1) Get a new core for my busted cooler

2) Get a new 'Hybrid' 600x300x76 $425 delivered to my door

3) Get a new 'Hybrid' 600x300x100 :wassup: $600 delivered to my door

I just want to make the right decisions for my car, my power target AND for my wallet.

also remember larger means more lag as the system has to be pressurised before its effective so if you have a monster truck intercooler expect lots of lag while the intercooler goes from 0 pressure to full pressure and then directs flow into the plenum. it wont affect overall top end power just add more lag to the system

yeah thats true. But i dont think a 3L with a GT35 with a small exh hsg is going to take long to come on boost. I wouldnt mind a little bit of lag to assist with getting some traction to get moving.

But i spoze the trade off between efficient intercooling at high power levels is to have a larger sized cooler and associated with that is lag... hmmm

I my car i went from a standard core 600x300x50 to a trust drag spl core 640x340x128mm and i didnt notice any difference in lag, that is probably because my old core was too restrictive and the new does take a while to pressurise but the fact it flows is more benificial!!! I would go the hundred its not much more money its not goin to effect lag significantly over 76mm but its alot more metal which means more heatsoak potential and cooler inlet temps!!! Cheers, Daniel.

neat analogy with the hot water pipe, imagine if the pipe was effectively empty and on the other side of the house?? how long from when the tap is opened till water reaches the other end??

bigger is definitely not always better, response is worth plenty when it comes making quick cars.

I don't get why people keep saying that the cooler has to be pressurised from 0 pressure to full pressure..

when the car is idleing, air is still in the pipes and cooler.. it's not like it is empty then when you step on the throttle nothing happens while air is filled up in the pipes and cooler and THEN you start to move..

but one other thing..

if you buy a 100mm thick cooler and I presume Bar and Plate, what radiator are you using and will it get any decent air flow to it to cool it?

also, one Intercooler company is always going to put another one down.

Hi guys, here is an example of 4 intercooler setups and pipework we have actually used;

1. R33 GTST Standard Intercooler and standard R32 GTST pipework

150 rwkw = 27 lbs of air per min @ 13 litres of i/c & pipework

2. Supra Intercooler and matching 63mm pipework

180 rwkw = 30 lbs of air per min @ 15 litres of i/c & pipework

3. Standard R33 GTR intercooler and 63/75mm pipework

250 rwkw = 40 lbs of air per min @ 21 litres of i/c & pipework

4. Greddy 600 X 300 X 115 and 80 mm pipework

400 rwkw = 60 lbs of air per min @ 28 litres of i/c & pipework

If you look at the numbers you can see that the rate of air flow and the volume of I/C and pipework have a fixed relationship (27 = 13 , 30 = 15 , 40 = 21 , 60 = 28). This is not an accident, I designed it that way. The reason is I wanted to keep the throttle response as close what it was when the car had 150 rwkw, because I though that was very nice response.

The theory I followed was, the more power the engine produces the more air it needs. Thus if I keep the increase in the volume of air inside the inlet system in the same proportion as the power increase, then the throttle response should stay the same. This is based on the engine using the air in the same time frame.

So when people say they fitted a FMIC and have not noticed any less throttle response, my response would be, that is what I would expect. As long as they went from 150 rwkw to 180 rwkw. On the other hand, if there was no power increase then it would be simply physically impossible for there to be no decrease in throttle response.

The problem of poor throttle response arrises when you have a 220 rwkw engine with a 28 litre inlet system. This is something I see way to often.

Hope that adds to this interesting thread.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Ha, well, it's been.... a bit of a journey. Things have taken much longer than I'd hoped. I'll probably put up a thread at some stage. Hopefully soon. The car's not done any kms since my update in June though, put it that way.
    • Here's the chart for fuel pressure vs. current draw, assuming your base fuel pressure is 3 bar and you run like 0.5bar boost on WOT, you should only momentarily hit 9amps here and there. (Ignore my prev post, I cannot read a chart these days it seems)
    • Those comp test results are not hideous. Whether they are accurate or not (ie, when that comp tester says 140 psi, is the real pressure120, 140 or 160?) is unknown to us. The state of the battery used to crank it over is unknown, etc etc. Many people around here would say that the absolute values and the spread are perfectly fine to just add boost and keep going. I personally would be happier with a narrower spread than that, but even the diff between 125 and 145 is not terrible. That one cylinder at 125 though, has probably copped some damage relative to the others. You should inspect the valves seeing as you've got it open. Do you know how to measure installed ring gaps? That, and an inspection of the rings themselves, is how you will determine whether they need to be replaced. If you're not good to do these things, take the block and the pistons and rings to a shop that is, and ask them for the go/no-go on them. Do the bores need a hone at all? If so, you might well be justified in getting some different pistons in order to get away from the ring supply problem. Whether you're happy to spend a lot more money right now, on more gear, rather than less money, but an amount that looks stupid given that you will only get a handful of rings in exchange for that money, is for you to decide.
    • also possibly backed up to my filler and shat down it! 🤣
    • Ok so i would love some advice here please, i purchased an R33 a few months back and its had a few mods done to the engine, its an RB25det running a Master ECU, 1200cc injectors, bigger turbo, oil cooler, oil filter relocation kit, Spool H-beam rods, acl/ross pistons. When i removed the motor from the vehicle (as its getting a respray) i thought i would compression test it and these are the following results. Cylinder 1-145psi, Cylinder 2-143psi, Cylinder 3-125psi, Cylinder 4-145psi, Cylinder 5-140psi, Cylinder 6-135psi this test was done with the motor on the ground and powering up the starter motor. I dropped the sump and found broken oil squirters on cylinder 3,5 and 6. I was told my rings are probably worn so i stripped the motor completely to get a new set of rings for it. The trouble is no one has these rings anywhere and they have to be custom made by Ross over in the states and will cost about $600+$200 delivery. My question is how can i tell if my rings are at fault and if they are still ok and is this price ok for a set of rings?
×
×
  • Create New...