Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Or what i could do is get a gts and keep that until i am off my P's then what i could do is stick a turbo into it, as the insurance willl be much cheaper then, as i would be off my P's.

By the way i will send u an email funky monkey.

If you're going to do a turbo conversion, you may as well just get a GTS-t now, since the cost to convert to one (plus value of the car) will probably come out more than an original GTS-t.

I'm not sure how much a non-turbo R32 GTS goes for but a RB20DET on it's own costs ~$1k based on what I've seen in the For Sale forum. A straight bolt-on isn't going to turn a RB20DE into a genuine RB20DET. The turbo isn't the only difference (different compression ratio hence piston work or new pistons, less oil runners?, you'll need new manifolds for the turbo). Then you have to consider the rest of the drivetrain, brakes, labour cost and getting it engineered.

If you are set on turbo performance, then I say "Turbo or nothing". You will save heaps if you can be patient. It's just a matter of whether you want to be patient or not. The difference in insurance for turbo vs. non-turbo isn't that great, so it's not really an issue.

About the only issue (according to your age) is if you get a GTS-t you will get hassled by cops (irrespective of power-to-weight legalities, you will still get hassled). I bought my GTS-t off a P-Plater and one of the reasons for his sale was he was sicked of being hassled by cops. I'm so glad I didn't get a turbo Skyline until now..

:)

The allure of owning a Skyline at that age is very tempting (I know, I wanted one but couldn't afford it at the time). I sometimes regret not having one back then, purely for the cool (wank) factor :headspin:, but each time I sit into my car I have no regrets. ;)

Rayage how much did u get your r32 for? And how much are u paying for insurance?, what other cars are out there that are fast that u would suggest for a first car. I dont mind the VR commodore, but then again it doesn't fasinate me compared to what a skyline does. I am so annoyed what my friends are saying bout me getting a non-turbo skyline, but i can afford one, but its my dad that doesn't let me. Do any of u guys know how to convince people? cos i can't seem to convince my dad, what should i say? cos i really do want a turbo gts-t.

lol you could buy a cefiro... i mean its a four door turbo car, goes pretty good and its nice to chuck around. Parents wouldn't object to a car like that.

I think your old man's worried about you speeding and crashing etc, but it dosen't matter if you have a GTS or a GTSt, both cars get to the same speeds, one just gets there a lil quicker, that's all.

I paid $15.5k for my 92 GTS-t. The market value for one is about $13k - $14.5k, so I paid a little bit more but got quite a number of goodies with it. Although it's not perfect I must say; there are a number of things that need fixing tho (nothing major, yet :rofl:, thankfully).

I currently have 3rd party property insurance, which is $399 through Just Cars. I'm still a little torn about whether I should go to full-comp through Shannons or leave it as 3rd party property (since I still don't believe in paying ~$2k per annum on insurance for a 12 year old car).

I dunno about convincing your dad tho... it really is up to you to demonstrate to him that you can handle a car responsibly. You also have to consider the power-to-weight ratio legality, since not all R32 GTS-ts are 'legal' for P platers (the later model ones are since they are heavier, so I'm told... but you'd better research this). Funkymonkey is correct in saying a GTS isn't any less dangerous than a GTS-t. Just that one has more power than the other stock for stock. And one doesn't necessarily deliver it's power in the most linear of fashion, too (so you'll have to be watchful of how you flex your right foot - esp. in the wet). Let's be objective here, all cars are dangerous if you drive recklessly or beyond the abilities of yourself or the car. I can't really suggest what is a good first car, tho, since everybody's abilities are different. But generally, I personally wouldn't recommend a turbo car as a first car for a (soon-to-be) P plater (which I presume you are judging by your age). Your first car will be dictated by what you can afford to buy and run. Particularly the 'run' aspect. You'll have to budget some money to fix up all the little things (and perhaps significant things, like a timing belt change).

Personally, I think you should sit down and have a good objective think about what you will be getting yourself into if you get a turbo car. You'll have to factor in: maintenace cost, insurance cost, copbait (P plater), how good your nerves are :headspin: since you'll proly be paranoid about leaving your car anywhere else except at home, how skilled you are at driving (be honest... I drove for 4 years on FWD cars on both manual and auto and the difference between FWD and RWD is like night and day, and more so in the wet), petrol cost, how responsible you are (will you TLGP every car you see?). You gotta understand that owning a turbo car or any sports car isn't so much about ownership but a responsiblity you undertake. It's not just a box/shell with four wheels that goes faster than most other boxes/shells with four wheels. :(

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I think the concept is highlighting the various scenarios where thicker oil helps, and thicker oil potentially doesn't help and only generates heat and costs power, in turn for safety which isn't actually any safer (unless you're going real hot). If anything this does highlight why throwing Castrol 10w-60 for your track days is always a solid, safe bet. 
    • Jason should have shown a real viscosity vs temp chart. All the grades have very little viscosity difference at full operating temperature.
    • Oops... I meant to include the connector  view... BR/W - power from fuse L/W - motor negative to fan control amp (and off to HVAC pin19) OR/B - PWM signal (from HVAC pin20) B --  ground  
    • Yep, if you are applying filler it sounds like there is something wrong with the body lol. Safe to assume there is going to be a lot of sanding going on if your still applying fillers.  Picture a perfect bare metal panel, smooth as glass. You lay down your primer, it's perfect. (why are you going to sand it?) You lay down the colour and clear, it's perfect. No sanding at all took place and you've got a perfectly finished panel.  You won't be chasing your tail, sounds like you were prepping to start laying filler. If your happy with the body after the sanding, there is some bare metal exposed and some areas with primer, no issues at all, start laying the filler. You are safe to lay filler on bare metal or primer (of course check your technical data sheet as usual for what your filler is happy to adhere to).  This isn't a 100% correct statement. There is primer that is happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. There are fillers that are happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. Just make sure you're using the right materials for the job.  Typically if you are using filler, you would go primer, colour and clear. I've never seen any instances before where someone has laid colour over body filler (maybe this happens, but I haven't seen it before). So your plan sounds pretty normal to me. 
    • I don't think there's any way someone is push starting this car.. I honestly can barely move it, and moving it and steering it is just flat out not possible. I'm sure it is, but needs a bigger man than me. I have a refurbished starter now. The starter man was quite clear and consise showing me how nothing inside a starter really should contribute to slow cranking, and turned out that for the most part... my starter was entirely fine. Still, some of the wear items were replaced and luckily it didn't show any signs of getting too hot, being unfit for use, etc. Which is 'good'. I also noticed the starter definitely sounded different, which is a bit odd considering nothing should have really changed there.... Removed and refit, and we'll pretend one of the manifold bolts didn't fully tighten up and is only "pretty" tight. GM only wants 18ft/lb anyway. I also found a way to properly get my analog wideband reading very slightly leaner than the serial wideband. There's Greg related reasons for this. The serial output is the absolute source of truth, but it is a total asshole to actually stay connected and needs a laptop. The analog input does not, and works with standalone datalogging. Previously the analog input read slightly richer, but if I am aiming at 12.7 I do not want one of the widebands to be saying 12.7 when the source of truth is 13.0. Now the source of truth will be 12.65 and the Analog Wideband will read 12.7. So when I tune to 12.7 it'll be ever so slightly safer. While messing with all of this and idling extensively I can confirm my car seems to restart better while hot now. I did add an old Skyline battery cable between the head and the body though, though now I really realise I should have chosen the frame. Maybe that's a future job. The internet would have you believe that this is caused by bad grounds. In finding out where my grounds actually were I found out the engine bay battery post actually goes to the engine, as well as a seperate one (from the post) to the body of the car. So now there's a third one making the Grounding Triangle which is now a thing. I also from extensive idling have this graph. Temperature (°C) Voltage (V) 85 1.59 80 1.74 75 1.94 70 2.1 65 2.33 60 2.56 55 2.78 50 2.98 45 3.23 40 3.51 35 3.75 30 4.00   Plotted it looks like this. Which is actually... pretty linear? I have not actually put the formula into HPTuners. I will have to re-engage brain and/or re-engage the people who wanted more data to magically do it for me. Tune should be good for the 30th!
×
×
  • Create New...