Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys. Been scouting these forms for months since I got my car last year. I'm in Alberta Canada but this seems to be the best forum for info. 

 

Anyhow, I have a. 1989 r32 gtst with the rb20det, fmic, rb25 turbo, walbro 255, blitz intake and bov delete. It will not idle when warm. The car will stall coming to red lights after the rpm drop almost everytime. I have a brand new tps sensor in the car and I still get code 43 (tps code). So I'm wondering is this my issue? Does anyone have any idea what the voltage is supposed to be going into the tps? I have 5v at the 3 wire plug and 12v at the tps sensor it self. I set the tps to. 0.48 where it should be and still nothing. I watched the voltage go up smoothly with the throttle all the way to wot (car off, ignition on) it reads 4.08v. 

 

My iicv will not help adjusting my idle either.. 

 

Also while I'm revving the car. I'll hold and maintain idle at 3k or 4k whatever I tried it at it sounds like a misfire Is also happening. I have brand new plugs in the car so I'm certain it's not that. It boosted fine last summer with no hesitation or missing, (haven't been able to drive it since because of winter here). 

 

What do you all think it is? Clearly an issue at the tps or something. 

 

Thank you all for the help on this, I hope to have this solved rather quick. I do plan to swap some Toyota echo coil packs in very shortly too, if anyone has some info on wiring that would be appreciated too! 

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/476326-help-rb20det-tps-issue-wont-idle/
Share on other sites

RB20s do not use the analog output from the TPS for the ECU.  They really only use the closed position switch for the idle position.  The potentiometer on them is for the TCU.  The idle switch should be set so that it changes state just as you start moving the throttle away from closed.  If you bend over the idling engine and you manually move the throttle bellcrank, at the very very first movement of it, the ECU should double pulse the injectors.  If you hear that at that point in the rotation, it is set correctly.  The trick is to set it too high, so you can tell that it is doing it, then adjust it down from there.

You MUST have the IACV working, otherwise it will stall coming to a halt.  Take it off, dismantle it and clean it with solvent.

28 minutes ago, GTSBoy said:

RB20s do not use the analog output from the TPS for the ECU.  They really only use the closed position switch for the idle position.  The potentiometer on them is for the TCU.  The idle switch should be set so that it changes state just as you start moving the throttle away from closed.  If you bend over the idling engine and you manually move the throttle bellcrank, at the very very first movement of it, the ECU should double pulse the injectors.  If you hear that at that point in the rotation, it is set correctly.  The trick is to set it too high, so you can tell that it is doing it, then adjust it down from there.

You MUST have the IACV working, otherwise it will stall coming to a halt.  Take it off, dismantle it and clean it with solvent.

OK so you don't feel like this is a wiring issue? I mean the tps is brand new and as far as I know setting it to 0.48 is all it should need to be done. I did clean my iacv but it won't adjust idle. I'll screw it either way and doesn't affect anything. I unplugged the tps while I did it. 

1 hour ago, Kraaken.r32 said:

and as far as I know setting it to 0.48 is all it should need to be done

No, you didn't listen to what I said.  RB20s are not RB25s.  The RB25 uses the analog output of its TPS (That's the potentiometer) for setting the idle point.  And the correct voltage setting for that is ~0.45v.  The RB20 DOES NOT use the potentiometer of the TPS for any function.  The pot is only for the transmission computer.  The RB20 uses the TPS's switch.  A digital switch.  On, off.  There is no 0.45 volts associated with that.  It is a simple click decision.  If you look closely at the TPS you will note that there are two connectors.  One for the ECU and one for the TCU.  In a manual car, the TCU one is not even really connected to anything.

As to whether there is a wiring problem with your IACV....there could be, but that is impossible to internet diagnose.  Dirty/seized up is always far more likely than a wiring problem unless someone clumsy has been buggering around with it.

Have you reset the ecu since putting in the new sensor?
To make sure its not the old code.

What happened to the old one, did it just die?

As gts boy said it might not be switching correctly.

How long has it been doing it?
Throttle body could possibly need a clean.

What got changed before it started this behaviour?

6 hours ago, GTSBoy said:

No, you didn't listen to what I said.  RB20s are not RB25s.  The RB25 uses the analog output of its TPS (That's the potentiometer) for setting the idle point.  And the correct voltage setting for that is ~0.45v.  The RB20 DOES NOT use the potentiometer of the TPS for any function.  The pot is only for the transmission computer.  The RB20 uses the TPS's switch.  A digital switch.  On, off.  There is no 0.45 volts associated with that.  It is a simple click decision.  If you look closely at the TPS you will note that there are two connectors.  One for the ECU and one for the TCU.  In a manual car, the TCU one is not even really connected to anything.

As to whether there is a wiring problem with your IACV....there could be, but that is impossible to internet diagnose.  Dirty/seized up is always far more likely than a wiring problem unless someone clumsy has been buggering around with it.

OK sorry didn't understand. Now I got it. So what you are saying is I should be able to adjust it forward till it idles ok then test? 

2 hours ago, Slap said:

Have you reset the ecu since putting in the new sensor?
To make sure its not the old code.

What happened to the old one, did it just die?

As gts boy said it might not be switching correctly.

How long has it been doing it?
Throttle body could possibly need a clean.

What got changed before it started this behaviour?

I believe it is an old code but I don't know how to reset the ecu. I removed my neg battery cable and let it sit for a minute but didn't help. It has been doing this since I owned my car. About a year. One thing I haven't done is clean the throttle body. Maybe that's next 

I believe it is an old code but I don't know how to reset the ecu. I removed my neg battery cable and let it sit for a minute but didn't help. It has been doing this since I owned my car. About a year. One thing I haven't done is clean the throttle body. Maybe that's next 
You can look it up specific or just wait for my buddy here to correct me.

Negative terminal off - Ignition on - press and hold brake for aprox 3-5 mins. Done.
Turn off key - put terminal on.

The ecu retains some power so by pressing the brake it tries to light the signals and drains the ecu.
1 minute ago, Slap said:

You can look it up specific or just wait for my buddy here to correct me.

Negative terminal off - Ignition on - press and hold brake for aprox 3-5 mins. Done.
Turn off key - put terminal on.

The ecu retains some power so by pressing the brake it tries to light the signals and drains the ecu.

Sounds simple. I'll give it a shot and then pull the codes after work today. Thank you! 

  • Like 1
13 hours ago, Slap said:

You can look it up specific or just wait for my buddy here to correct me.

Negative terminal off - Ignition on - press and hold brake for aprox 3-5 mins. Done.
Turn off key - put terminal on.

The ecu retains some power so by pressing the brake it tries to light the signals and drains the ecu.

Sounds simple. I'll give it a shot and then pull the codes after work today. Thank you! 

So did some diagnosing. Everything is checking out perfect. We had a scan tool to monitor everything and the tps is working, iacv working, the only thing I'm unsure of is the O2 sensor. Also I'm going to coil pack convert the car this weekend so that should solve any misfire I have I believe. But the idle hunt is still there. Now I got it to the point it will idle very well, but when I rev it a couple times the car will then drop the idle to 500 or less and struggle to stay alive. 

[emoji849][emoji51][emoji3166][emoji856]

 

I have had to much negative feed back when i assist with things like this not that all the feed back is bad

. Hopefully someone will chime in b4 the temptation to hypothesis becomes to much!

 

 

Ahh i remember this... and i quote gts boy here as a flash back.

 

"Gents,

When Slap is asking about closed loop, he's talking about closed loop fuelling.  I suspect when Johnny Dose is talking about closed loop (in above posts) he's talking about closed loop idle speed control.  So, talking at cross purposes.

As has been posted before;

At idle (ie, TPS closed, ~0.45v) the ECU is definitely in closed loop idle speed control.

At idle, provided the O2 sensor is warm enough, the ECU will be in closed loop mixture control.  But this often fails and the ECU will just revert to the idle fuelling map.

At idle, the ECU does not change timing based on O2 feedback.

At idle, the ECU adds AND subtracts timing from the base 15° according to its needs for idle speed control, but is aiming to run 15° and control speed with IACV wherever possible.".

 

 

18 hours ago, Slap said:

emoji849.pngemoji51.pngemoji3166.pngemoji856.png

 

I have had to much negative feed back when i assist with things like this not that all the feed back is bad

. Hopefully someone will chime in b4 the temptation to hypothesis becomes to much!

 

 

Ahh i remember this... and i quote gts boy here as a flash back.

 

"Gents,

When Slap is asking about closed loop, he's talking about closed loop fuelling.  I suspect when Johnny Dose is talking about closed loop (in above posts) he's talking about closed loop idle speed control.  So, talking at cross purposes.

As has been posted before;

At idle (ie, TPS closed, ~0.45v) the ECU is definitely in closed loop idle speed control.

At idle, provided the O2 sensor is warm enough, the ECU will be in closed loop mixture control.  But this often fails and the ECU will just revert to the idle fuelling map.

At idle, the ECU does not change timing based on O2 feedback.

At idle, the ECU adds AND subtracts timing from the base 15° according to its needs for idle speed control, but is aiming to run 15° and control speed with IACV wherever possible.".

 

 

15 degrees is the proper timing for the rb20? I heard was 20 degrees? I'm going to retime the car this weekend as well after my coil pack conversion is done. So basically the O2 sensor would have no bearing effect on the idle of my car? I'm horrible when it comes to electrical.. So excuse me if I'm understanding things wrong here. 

 

Thank you for the help

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The time is always correct. Only the date is wrong. It currently thinks it is January 19. Tomorrow it will say it is January 20. The date and time are ( should be ! ) retrieved from the GPS navigation system.
    • Buy yourself a set of easy outs. See if they will get a good bite in and unthread it.   Very very lucky the whole sender didn't let go while on the track and cost you a motor!
    • Well GTSBoy, prepare yourself further. I did a track day with 1/2 a day prep on Friday, inpromptu. The good news is that I got home, and didn't drive the car into a wall. Everything seemed mostly okay. The car was even a little faster than it was last time. I also got to get some good datalog data too. I also noticed a tiny bit of knock which was (luckily?) recorded. All I know is the knock sensors got recalibrated.... and are notorious for false knock. So I don't know if they are too sensitive, not sensitive enough... or some other third option. But I reduced timing anyway. It wasn't every pull through the session either. Think along the lines of -1 degree of timing for say, three instances while at the top of 4th in a 20 minute all-hot-lap session. Unfortunately at the end of session 2... I noticed a little oil. I borrowed some jack stands and a jack and took a look under there, but as is often the case, messing around with it kinda half cleaned it up, it was not conclusive where it was coming from. I decided to give it another go and see how it was. The amount of oil was maybe one/two small drops. I did another 20 minute session and car went well, and I was just starting to get into it and not be terrified of driving on track. I pulled over and checked in the pits and saw this: This is where I called it, packed up and went home as I live ~20 min from the track with a VERY VERY CLOSE EYE on Oil Pressure on the way home. The volume wasn't much but you never know. I checked it today when I had my own space/tools/time to find out what was going on, wanted to clean it up, run the car and see if any of the fittings from around the oil filter were causing it. I have like.. 5 fittings there, so I suspected one was (hopefully?) the culprit. It became immediately apparent as soon as I looked around more closely. 795d266d-a034-4b8c-89c9-d83860f5d00a.mp4       This is the R34 GTT oil sender connected via an adapter to an oil cooler block I have installed which runs AN lines to my cooler (and back). There's also an oil temp sensor on top.  Just after that video, I attempted to unthread the sensor to see if it's loose/worn and it disintegrated in my hand. So yes. I am glad I noticed that oil because it would appear that complete and utter catastrophic engine failure was about 1 second of engine runtime away. I did try to drill the fitting out, and only succeeded in drilling the middle hole much larger and now there's a... smooth hole in there with what looks like a damn sleeve still incredibly tight in there. Not really sure how to proceed from here. My options: 1) Find someone who can remove the stuck fitting, and use a steel adapter so it won't fatigue? (Female BSPT for the R34 sender to 1/8NPT male - HARD to find). IF it isn't possible to remove - Buy a new block ($320) and have someone tap a new 1/8NPT in the top of it ($????) and hope the steel adapter works better. 2) Buy a new block and give up on the OEM pressure sender for the dash entirely, and use the supplied 1/8 NPT for the oil temp sender. Having the oil pressure read 0 in the dash with the warning lamp will give me a lot of anxiety driving around. I do have the actual GM sensor/sender working, but it needs OBD2 as a gauge. If I'm datalogging I don't actually have a readout of what the gauge is currently displaying. 3) Other? Find a new location for the OEM sender? Though I don't know of anywhere that will work. I also don't know if a steel adapter is actually functionally smart here. It's clearly leveraged itself through vibration of the motor and snapped in half. This doesn't seem like a setup a smart person would replicate given the weight of the OEM sender. Still pretty happy being lucky for once and seeing this at the absolute last moment before bye bye motor in a big way, even if an adapter is apparently 6 weeks+ delivery and I have no way to free the current stuck/potentially destroyed threads in the current oil block.
    • Literally looks like direct port nitrous haha
×
×
  • Create New...