Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone,

New here. Just posted an intro and here is the problem I am having that I have not found on here. Or anywhere for that matter. 

1993 R33 GTST with no real performance mods done yet. All my reading here has a garage full of parts to install but having a running/idle problem.

Car starts and runs great. Did all the standard stuff, filters, fluids, coil packs, plugs, brakes, etc. Idles fine and normal during warm and cold starts.

The issue is when driving. When coming to a stop at a set of lights and I put it in neutral or just push in the clutch the rpms drop to around 1500 rpm and sit there until the car comes to a complete stop. Then they drop back to normal. Doesn’t matter if brake easy or hard either. 

I’ve cleaned and tested MAF. Cleaned IAC Valve, replaced vacuum hoses with silicone. Checked and rechecked clamps/hoses/piping throughout engine bay. 

Anyone got any ideas?

Thanks!

 

Edited by JustJay
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/478006-not-another-idling-thread/
Share on other sites

It should hold at around 1100 rpm under those circumstances, so it is doing mostly the right thing, just a bit too high. I would suggest that you have an air leak somewhere and the idle is simply too high and the ECU is dropping timing (at proper, stationary idle) to get the revs down - but it can't/won't do that with a non-zero speed signal. You could put it on the dyno and put a Consult unit or other scan tool on the ECU and see what the timing is in the ECU while it coasts down, then at a stationary idle. I wouldn't be surprised if it was 0-5° stationary.

Thanks. Kind of figured it must be a leak somewhere but I can’t seem to find it. 

So at non-zero speed elevated RPM’s are normal. 1100 vs 700?  It’s been a while since I’ve had a manual but maybe it was so gradual I didn’t know whereas 1500 rpm is quite noticeable.

i used to get constant high rpm until replacing a split vac line. Now only as described. Do these symptoms suggest a particular area to focus on? 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...