Jump to content
SAU Community

RB25DET Balancer Fitment- Brand new, not tight?

CLEM0
 Share

Recommended Posts

CLEM0 Enthusiast

CLEM0

Posted
Posted

Hello-

Just got a query regarding the fitment of an RB25 balancer/crank pulley on the crankshaft.

I have tried two seperate engines with a brand new balancer on them, and 2 seperate used balancers, and both engines with all 3 balancers are fairly easy to get on by hand, and can spin fully around just by hand. It isn't loose but not what i'd consider tight/interference fit.

Is the interference fit on the face of the crank when the bolt it tightened, or the the sides of the crank? I don't know why this is not rock solid...

Are both crankshafts out of round, or is this how they're meant to be? I am struggling to believe that two seperate good condition engines that both ran perfectly before taking balancer off (timing belt) - both don't fit very tight with a brand new genuine OEM balancer. It just seems odd.

Cheers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Waders360
      M35 Brake caliper replacement

      By Waders360 · Posted

      I've looked up the parts number (41011AL501). It's around $700 OEM. Usually our Infiniti G35 here in Canada have interchangeable parts with my Stagea but the parts number are not the same. I have looked around and it seems the JDM 2005 V35 Skyline (which is the same as our G35) has the same caliper but I cannot confirm. And I can't find a repair kit. The inner brake pads drags on the rotor, seems to be rusty piston. Thanks for the info by the way
    • GTSBoy
      Valve clearance for RB25det series 2

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      This coupled with 6-9 speed autos with ridiculously short gearing is why these modern shitbox cars always seem so fast off the line. If it wasn't for those things, Raptors would not seem fast. The problem we have is there is a driveability gap between a more gentle take off and a wheelspinning sideways launch. The difference between ankle flex required to achieve one and ankle flex required to achieve the other is about 0.5°.
    • Kinkstaah
      Valve clearance for RB25det series 2

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      Yeah I think I'm also with the opposite here. It's 'hard to keep up with traffic' because in the real world I'm accelerating with 15% throttle and they are pinning it. It feels like I'm being an overt dickhead at anything above 15% throttle, so the car sounds like I'm being an overt dickhead to keep up with/get ahead of traffic when I'm really just trying to drive with traffic. There would be no issue 'keeping up with traffic' if we used the same level of throttle input/aggression to drive around. People really do just drive around with their foot nearly pinned in econoboxes.
    • soviet_merlin
      Valve clearance for RB25det series 2

      By soviet_merlin · Posted

      To be fair it's the other way around. 300kw is boring in a modern Golf or BMW. They are so competent / well-engineered / devoid of emotion that you have to go stupid fast to feel anything. Whereas the <300kw RB still makes all the right noises and it feels good to drive. Can pull off at the lights with the turbo whooshing and the blow-off pssshing and feel like the coolest kid on the block. Just don't look to the side where you'll see the bored housewifes in their shitbox Yaris/Corolla/Camry that kept up because you didn't go fast at all
    • Dose Pipe Sutututu
      Valve clearance for RB25det series 2

      By Dose Pipe Sutututu · Posted

      300kW is so boring in a Skyline, you'll get spanked by someone's mum's Golf with Alibaba pipes, and an email tune.
×
×
  • Create New...