Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've recently upgraded and i've compared my 3dMark Score to a few reviews and for some reason i'm up there with a Ti4600.?!?!

Anyway Here's My Specs that matter.

Epox 8K3A

AMD XP 1800+

Corsair XMS3200 @ CAS 2 Running at 2700with Bios Set to Turbo Mode

Sparkle 128mb GF4 Ti4200 (With Samsung 4ns Ram)

Det's 40.72.

Drivers set to defaults as installed.

Windows XP Pro SP1

Via 4in1 4.43

32Mark 2001SE @ 1024x768

Also when i upgraded to 40.71/72 (.71's are buggy) I picked up ~90 3DMarks.

STD. Not Overclocked 250Core/444mem

10082

Overclocked Vid Card to 275Core/550mem

10790

When I had the cheap Crappy ram (generic) it lowered my base 32mark 2001se score to 8000.

Ram obviously makes a hell of a difference.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/4846-3dmark-2001se-your-specs/
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

3dmark 2001se is pretty big..

3DMark Link

Since then I have unlocked my cpu. I've set it with a 333Mhz FSB and jumped the stock setup to 10500.

Now with overclocked vid card etc.. 295/560 it made around the 11400.

Now I just have to fiddle around with overclocking the system some more..

  • 1 year later...

yeah a friend has a xp 2100 overclocked to 2200 real Mhz or a 3200 rating.

other mate with xp 2500 on abit nf7s m/b and Ati 9800pro got over 20000 3dmark 2k1

processor was running at around 3500 rating and card was over clocked to the s**t house.

I have downloaded 3DMark2003. Scores in the mid 4000. I remember doing the 2001 a while ago and scored approx 10000.

Every couple of years they like to make your machine seem a little less significant compared the current standards.

Guess its time to upgrade.... again.....

nah, would rather spend money on the car

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, yes, every CU on the bus is available via the Consult port, but whether the scanner you are using is capable of talking to the TCU, the ABS/TCS modules, etc etc, is what is at question here. Many of them are only for engine codes. So, if you have one of those, you won't know if the ABS is having a bitch.
    • That's now. R chassis Skylines come from a time when the tolerance in the ADRs was a bit more....slack. My car, on 235/35-17, which is damn near the exact same size as the original 205/55-16, is pretty much bang on correct indicated speed across the whole legal range. That's demonstrated with constant speed run over 5km, and GPS speed. It's just the luck of the draw. My particular speedo head has to be the thing that is "calibrated" that way, because everything else (the diff ratio, the gearbox and the speedo drive**) are all same same as most other Skylines. **OK, so the speedo drive is a Navara unit to drive the R32's cable, not the electronic unit than an R33/4 would normally have with teh same gear on it. Otherwise, I applaud your OCD tendencies, and I would do the same if I needed to.
    • Not too sure, I believe the Nissan consult port does everything? Also just filled up the reservoir to full and the light is still on. The float seems to move up and down fine.
    • The speedo's can be very conservative, when my Mazda NC MX5 speedo is showing 118kph, the GPS, and a calibrated radar.... cop mate.....hits me at around 110kph +/- 1 or 2 kph, and that is on a 215/45 17, stock tyres size is 205/45 17 as well, so weirdly conservative with stock tyre size When my Commodore speedo red 116kph GPS had me at 110kph on 255/40 17, so again conservative Google says manufacturers need to set the speedo from 4 to 10% slower than actual road speed.....for safety.....and compliance  After doing some offset and clearance measurements to see what can fit the NC on 17x8 +40, without guard rolling or rubbing anything at my current ride height, I've decided that when my tyres are toast, I'm going to fit 225/45 17 and see where that gets me IRT actual speed of my speedo and GPS/radar From the online calculator I should be still be doing around 5kph under an actual 110kph when the speedo is showing 110kph My ADHD requires that when I'm doing 110kph on the speedo, that the actual road speed is actually really close to that, and not alot slower And going from 205 to 225 still keeps the car within the %/mm allowable in the NSW vehicle rules and regulations, which is nice, as long as I'm looking at the latest version that is.....LOL https://www.nsw.gov.au/sites/default/files/2021-02/RMS-13.464-Light-vehicle-modifications-Vehicle-Standards-Information-No-6-November-2013.pdf
    • Take the value it measured as, and pick the closest range available that is above the reading on the screen.   Also, no point just testing the coils. Read what has been said again. You need to test all your wiring, everything.
×
×
  • Create New...