Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all

Any reason not to get the Kelford Drop in springs for RB25DET NEO?

RB25DET NEO “Drop-In” Spring to Suit OEM Retainer

Any concerns with OEM base / retainer that would warrant replacement ?

 

RB25DET NEO Beehive Spring | Titanium Retainers

I know that Ti-retainers would be lighter / faster on valvetrain making it easier to move.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/484803-upgraded-neo-valve-springs/
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, GTSBoy said:

Unless you're planning to turn 11ty rpm, there's no need to spend on jewellery like Ti retainers. If you're flush with cash, go ahead. It's good for the insta-likes.

Agreed, just was not sure if RBs had anything that would dictate recommending new base or retainer. Everyone recommends head drain due to oil pooling the head. Didn’t kno if there was a similar thing potentially for valve springs  

 

 

6 hours ago, Rand0b said:

Didn’t kno if there was a similar thing potentially for valve springs

Definitely do valve springs, on my old non-NEO motor, with 1.7bar of boost I would get valve float (power went flat, sounded like a misfire).

Current motor has Performance Springs springs & Ti retainers. Was about $200AUD more to get the retainers, so why not? Lol.. now I can tell @GTSBoy I have Ti retainers.

  • Like 1
4 hours ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

Definitely do valve springs, on my old non-NEO motor, with 1.7bar of boost I would get valve float (power went flat, sounded like a misfire).

Current motor has Performance Springs springs & Ti retainers. Was about $200AUD more to get the retainers, so why not? Lol.. now I can tell @GTSBoy I have Ti retainers.

These ones from golebys?

 

 

IMG_1381.png

They're used quite a bit, however Kelford springs and cam combo would be a no brainer.

I went with this brand purely from a cost perspective on my last motor (not the 1st one) and carried them across onto the current motor.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Oh, also, forgot to add these photos I believe.
    • Thought i'd update on this. I was able to get in contact with Craig Lieberman and later on Darryl Alison (owner of Kaizo Industries). Darryl was able to help me verify that my car was in fact one of theirs and is helping me find more info on mine !
    • There's restrictor pills in the stock boost control hoses. That's how they set the amount that was bled off and hence the "high" boost setting. The usual mod in the day was to remove it and send the "high" boost setting up to about 14 psi.
    • Thanks Duncan, that's the best info I've read. Furthermore after learning about the PCM programming side controlling the factory boost solenoid, the purpose of the solenoid is to "bleed" boost when pin 25 is earthed, thus allowing spring pressure in the wastegate actuator to overcome diaphragm boost pressure, thus closing or reducing the position of the wastegate flap creating more boost as the turbo is able to spin faster. It's pretty cool to see a designated Pill to do exactly this, would have liked to have seen it with a tiny filter over the end for those moments in vacuum.  The constant bleed pill has now been removed completely from the system and solenoid boost control has been restored once again.   Case closed 😂
    • The wideband reading is meaningless if it's not running. Why are you using shitty old sidefeeds on any engine, let alone a Neo? What manifold and fuel rail are you using to achieve that? Beyond that, can't help you with AEM stuff as I've never been their ECU/CAS combo.
×
×
  • Create New...