Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys. Need some suggestion, new to turbo car.

Got a r34 gtt automatic, all it got now it's a Nismo exhaust, is it possible to get around 200 rwkw out of an auto?

If so, which FMIC ( prefer straight bolt on kit), saw on Greenline website that HKS kit is not suitable for auto? fuel/air management, EBC and would a hi flow or new turbo required at the desired power output?

I guess I would like to have a overall package that will produce good response with big more power than stock.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/48496-help-what-mod-for-200-rwkw/
Share on other sites

Your only option for engine management is the GReddy E-manage....luckily only just this weekend I've managed to find a way for the ignition harness to be wired in without issue!!!

Check out the e-manage Thread at the top of this section to get more info on it...it's the last few pages that are relevant.

I think you could move the trannie fluid cooler to the drivers side inner guard, like the opposite of the standard intercooler then you would have no issues with any fmic that is made for a GTT. Also you may be able to modify the mounting bracket to move the fluid cooler closer to the radiator.

Emanage should be the way to go although I am still experimenting with a modified standard ECU. I currently have 189 rwkw with stock cooler, stock turbo, panel filter, 0.8 bar boost and a good exhaust.

I have heard of a few people getting no extra power from a fmic with R34's unlike R33's and R32's which seem to pick up a bit automatically.

FYI, my GTT has been running EManage (minus ignition harness) for close to 2 years now and i am very happy with the result and response...no auto issues to date with crisp, fast changes but am considering auto mods such as altering stall etc. Current set-up: Hybrid FMIC, Hi-flowed standard turbo,Emanage,AVC-R (running 1 BAR), K&N Panel filter, Z32 AFM, 3" Dump, 3.5" JASMA exhaust and 3" CAT back, current power 220rwkW...am fitting Walbro internal 255lph fuel pump and searching for a set of injectors....

Cheers,

Michael

Thats weird Neo R34, I had the emanage setup with the Z32 but it wouldnt idle right.

Anyways here are some figure for u to think about:

At that time I had a front/cat back/e-01 boost controller and hks panel and i got about 170rwkw at about .85 bar.

Now I got the PFC/front mount/front and cat back/hks panel filter/ e-01 and I still only got about 180rwkw at about .7 bar.

I just cant seem to get power, anyways back to the topic. I agree best bang for buck is the Emanage. Neo mind me asking where u take ur car too?

ok. so greddy emanage seem to be a good option. I will look into that. thanx guys.

but what about stock R34 turbo n IC? Can they stand the daily grind of 200 rwkw or adding a FMIC and a hi flow/ new turbo(HKS 2530) are a more reliable option?

hoo@h- i think your questions are already answered in the above posts...look at the figures and mods, all will be revealed.

GroundRun- I am in Perth WA, if you are serious PM me and i will provide details. Check out for your own info the articles in back issues of HPI re: mods to GTT with manual and power gains...maybe your answers are there. Hope that helps.

Cheers,

Michael

back issues of HPI re: mods to GTT with manual and power gains...maybe your answers are there. Hope that helps.

Cheers,

Michael

Thanks Neo, looks like I can just follow your step and get that power figure i am looking for.

And, yes, I have got that HPI mag with the power figure n what mods are required, but just need to be sure that same mod apply to auto.

I guess I just want to know any other fellow auto r34 owner have achieved the result (200 rwkw) with a proven n reliable package. then I can just cut n paste it into me car. :P

by the way, I am in brissy, so if any1 know any good shop here that can do the sort of mod, please let me know. ta.

Your only option for engine management is the GReddy E-manage....luckily only just this weekend I've managed to find a way for the ignition harness to be wired in without issue!!!

What's wrong with S-AFC? It may not have as many features, but it's still an option.

Nothing wrong with an SAFC...just thought the way he was talking he'd want some finer control of the ratios...and if he wanted to adjust ignition curves one of the only engine magement systems that'll work with the tiptronic is an e-manage.

Didn't want to tread on any SAFC toes :P

A full kit would be in your hands for $700 (e-manage + both harnesses + software) at the moment, and you can install it in less than a day easy

It handles boost cut and atmospheric BOV idle too...it really does have some good features.

You need access to a laptop...seriously though I used to have PC in the garage with a long cable on it that reached into the car....as long as you've got a computer nearby you can adjust the settings.

The benefit is it takes literally seconds to type in the new settings whereas PFC contollers are time consuming :(

Have a good read about it at www.mohdparts.com If you're considering getting one, get it from this guy (Mohammed) as his service is second to none..very helpful.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...