Jump to content
SAU Community

R32 RB25DE - converting to RB25DET

MR R32

By MR R32,
in Engines & Forced Induction

 Share

Recommended Posts

MR R32 Experienced

MR R32

Posted
Posted

Hi Guys,

I am looking at buying an R32 with an RB25DET. I would like to take the engine out and swap it with an RB25DET for obvious reasons.

I have been told that the brakes are the same on the 1993 R32 RB25DE as the R32 RB20DET, and that only the engine, gearbox will need to be changed.

Can anybody please offer me some information, or advice ASAP as I am looking to buy tomorrow or the next.

Thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/48924-r32-rb25de-converting-to-rb25det/
Share on other sites
Pva_Glue Grand Master

Pva_Glue

Posted
Posted
Hi Guys,

I am looking at buying an R32 with an RB25DET. I would like to take the engine out and swap it with an RB25DET for obvious reasons.

I have been told that the brakes are the same on the 1993 R32 RB25DE as the R32 RB20DET, and that only the engine, gearbox will need to be changed.

Can anybody please offer me some information, or advice ASAP as I am looking to buy tomorrow or the next.

Thanks

ok let me get this right, I am sure its typo, so you want to buy a R32 with RB25DET then you want to take RB25DET out and replace with RB25DET... for obvious reasons... :confused: reason would be different engine but same spec?

probably need to change Breaks..... suspension if you have the money, get some new Intercoolers, new engine management ECU...etc.

good luck

MR R32 Experienced

MR R32

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Sorry - it was a typo.

It currently has a non turbo 2.5L engine and I would like to replace it with an RB25DET.

The car is a 1993 model and the owner claims that this model has the same brakes as the R32 with a RB20DET which means brakes would not need to be changed.

  • 2 weeks later...
geordie Proficient

geordie

Posted
Posted

Thats wrong, brakes are N/A spec, single pot calipers, smaller rotors and a 4 stud hub. So unless the car has been upgraded then the brakes are no different to other N/A skylines. The diff is also different, turbo's came with LSD. Un sure to suspension specs but i am going to asume that the spring etc aren't the same as a turbo spec vehicle. Could be wrong, the weight difference in the models would be fairly similar (1380kg for mine, which is the GTS25) Apparently the intake manifold on the R32 Rb25de is the same as the Rb20det...

Basicly, look at the caliper, the 4pot models are larger and have nissan written on them.

Hope this helped.....

predator Grand Master

predator

Posted
Posted

geordie is incorrect.. some non turbos also come with LSD.. and also the same brakes as the turbo. Factory options can mix and match to give anything.

The brakes are probably the same as the rb20det in the latter models on the rb25de's. So you are correct mr r32 in that you'll just have to change the engine.. and the gearbox would probably be recommended but non mandatory to start(the rb20det gearbox will fit behind an rb25det)

RaseR Collaborator

RaseR

Posted
Posted

predator, you are wrong - my '92 R32 GTS-t, and nearly every other one I've ever seen have had 4 piston brake calipers as standard, not 2....

The caliper I am referring to has the silver NISSAN logo on the front, Sumitomo stamped onto the body, and are the same as used on the Z32 300ZX and the S14 200SX.

  • 3 years later...
BigC1988 Enthusiast

BigC1988

Posted
Posted

I just got my RB25DET (series 2) and I was hoping you could help me with some questions.

My Skyline is non turbo so it will be a big step with the RB25.

Now then, my first question is about the gearbox mounts, I hear they aren't the same and I will also have problems with the speedo meter. What do you know about this? Can I use the Xmember of the R33 ??

The second is about the harness, everyone that has ever swapped an engine told me that the harness is the most difficult part of the swap. Do you have the diagram of the R32 and the R33 (still can't find it for the R32) and some pointers on how this is done??

Hope to get a reply from you soon

Carlos Rudolph

GTS4WD Grand Master

GTS4WD

Posted
Posted

Yes.. speedo is out of wack..

Its one of the gears in the Gauge cluster.. they used to make cogs to change it to the correct speed.. but these days they are very hard to find..

Your speedo will read over.

There are a few R33 gearbox into R32 threads floating around.. have a look. Off the top of my head it is ia straight fit.

In terms of harness.. there isnt really a hard part.. just swap them over.. as you need to run a 33 ECU anyways..

Best advice I can give you.. look for an R32 and R33 workshop manual for the wiring diagrams..

I have seen a fair few Rb25 into R32 threads in the DIY section of this forum..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • sinn3r
      R34 Skyline climate control unit transistor

      By sinn3r · Posted

      Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • Kinkstaah
      Blue slip

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • GTSBoy
      Best place to order Authetic R32 Parts in Japan

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • GTSBoy
      Ethanol Content Sensor - Always at 11%?

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • GTSBoy
      Blue slip

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...