Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Excellent , I'd like to hear how it goes . I may have found an R32 25 lower half to work with . I gather you cut it off out past the rail mounts and weld on plates to match the throttle bodies profile , then drill and tap the through bolt holes , make port holes then bolt it up .

Chow A .

  • 3 weeks later...

Well I would like to throw a spanner in the works here.( have not read whole thread, but noticed comment about single throttle conversion)

Any modified car, no matter what it is, is only as good as it's weakest link.

If a car is setup for a particular purpose then compromises are made.

I am by no means an expert in these matters, but would like to add my opinion.

Often I have seen (& driven) modified cars that have been built with "killer" parts lists that "on paper" should kick ass. BUT, they have not been greater than the

"sum off the parts", in other words, they have been built with all the "name" bits & pieces, but the overall application has been overshot in some areas.

Massive top end power is totally useless on the street if mid range torque is sacrificed to find it. If you are building a drag car then it doesnt matter, but the street is where it's at.

For example - the latest engine build on my street GTR (& I hope it's the last) has been a realistic downgrading so I can actually use it on the street. I reluctantly swapped the HKS step proL 288 cams for a pair of much more sensible 272s.

With the 288s, the car was a total pig in traffic off the line & couldn't even sit happily at 60 unless I kept it in 2nd or 3rd gear. Now the car has much better bottom end response, still will pull well into the revs, & I can use the car.

It does has a single throttle conversion(85mm), & with the single turbo, custom valves, conservative tune at 1 bar on PULP, it makes 375rwkw(500hp) & is responsive, well behaved & just what I wanted.

Big number parts are fun to talk about, but what we all want is a reliable, fast street car. If a single throttle conversion is done in conjuntion with the RIGHT parts

and tuned accordingly then it CAN be an advantage.

I have seen articles on Jap GTRS that run low nines still using the original 6 throttle bodies & a std plenum!!! So go figure!

At the drags, who cares about mid range.

The race GTR has a single 100mm throttle body & 292 cams.

Boost will start around 6500rpm.

The engine is built & the car is nearly finished.

So close, yet so far away.

Cant wait to get it finished. Been a long time between drinks.

And I like a drink as much as the next guy!!!

I started this thread so I'll put it to rest . My original drama with the RB30 DET was clearence of the inlet manifold and the throttle body facing the wrong way . I guessed wrongly that the RB26 head and inlet system would cost a motsa . Since the RB26/30 have the same bore size and coolant passages getting the 26 head on a 30 block is easy (don't forget larger dia head bolts) . So for what I consider very reasonable money I bought a complete RB26 head/inlet system . So in other words I have the best performing factory option which solves the above probs as well . If I had grafted the GTR inlet system onto an RB25 (R32) head along with the GTR cams and springs it would have cost more for less performance . Also not having a RB25 bottom end to trip over helps .

Cheers A .

I started this thread so I'll put it to rest . My original drama with the RB30 DET was clearence of the inlet manifold and the throttle body facing the wrong way . I guessed wrongly that the RB26 head and inlet system would cost a motsa . Since the RB26/30 have the same bore size and coolant passages getting the 26 head on a 30 block is easy (don't forget larger dia head bolts) . So for what I consider  very reasonable money I bought a complete RB26 head/inlet system . So in other words I have the best performing factory option which solves the above probs as well . If I had grafted the GTR inlet system onto an RB25 (R32) head along with the GTR cams and springs it would have cost more for less performance . Also not having a RB25 bottom end to trip over helps .  

Cheers  A .

The right decision A, let us know how it goes. :D

this thread's got me thinking about what i should do when my motor goes back together.

ATM i've got an rb24det with standard bolt ons but to go back on it, is a k27, trust manifold and gate and a modded GTR manifold. mines alittle bit different though, its had the rb20det runners cut before the injectors and the gtr manifold has been cut and rewelded to erase the 6 throttles and keep the injector holes (uses 12 injectors, 6 gtr and 6 rb20), then the standard throttle has been mounted on the front.

now you've got me thinking i should leave the standard manifold on and dont worry about throwing the gtr manifold back on, do you think zoom lost all that power from the 6 throttle setup, or the whole design of the manifold (shorter runners, plenum size etc)?

this thread's got me thinking about what i should do when my motor goes back together.  

ATM i've got an rb24det with standard bolt ons but to go back on it, is a k27, trust manifold and gate and a modded GTR manifold. mines alittle bit different though, its had the rb20det runners cut before the injectors and the gtr manifold has been cut and rewelded to erase the 6 throttles and keep the injector holes (uses 12 injectors, 6 gtr and 6 rb20), then the standard throttle has been mounted on the front.  

now you've got me thinking i should leave the standard manifold on and dont worry about throwing the gtr manifold back on, do you think zoom lost all that power from the 6 throttle setup, or the whole design of the manifold (shorter runners, plenum size etc)?

I think 2.4 litres compared to 2 litres (as per the Zoom test) will make a lot of difference. The GTR inlet system is designed for 2.6 litres, so you are not so far away from its design parameters. I reckon it's a goer and you should use it. :D

I have a question though, why did you go away from the mutliple throttle bodies?

I have a question though, why did you go away from the mutliple throttle bodies?

it was done in japan, to be honest i dunno why they did it! probably wanted the 6 extra injectors more, or mabye they did the same as zoom, tried it with them on, saw a loss so went to a single throttle?

:headspin:

well think about it this way.. you can either get an rb25det from a 33 thats done probably 80,000 ks or you can build a fresh motor with .4 of a litre more (than the rb20). personally i'd prefer the fresh motor with Tomei forgies!

but on another note the cars 16 years old with 60,000 kms, so it could of been done back in the 90's when rb25s were still fairly new and pricey.

anyway i've got the best of both worlds! a huge turbo and a stroker! :headspin:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...