Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Gday,

Engine = RB25DET

Car = Cefiro

Limitations = Stock turbo

Considerations = Engine reliability

Goal = 200rwkw+.

Mod path 1

1. GTR intercooler

2. All air stuff (filter, dump, exhaust etc)

3. Apexi AVCR

4. Apexi SAFC (or SAFC II whatever the different is)

Mod path 2

1. GTR intercooler

2. All air stuff (filter, dump, exhaust etc)

3. Apexi PFC (no boost module)

4. two-stage boost controller solonoid thingy (cheapie)

This will be street car with occasional track/drift use.

I probably won't be upgrading turbos (if at all) for a long time. So the 1st path has the advantage of inital small outlay.

On the other hand the 2nd path has flexibility.

Which one is better and why/what for?

I guess what I wanna know is in the meantime (before getting bigger turbo, injectors etc) can the PFC justify the money in performance?

Thanks.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/50102-rb25-do-up-path/
Share on other sites

My 20 cents worth....

Mod path 1

3. Apexi AVCR

4. Apexi SAFC

This leaves you no way to adjust the ignition timing, this is bad for power production and reliability. You might get to 200 rwkw but that is simply max power. Without igntiion timing tuning, the average power will suffer as will response.

Mod path 2

3. Apexi PFC (no boost module)

4. two-stage boost controller solonoid thingy (cheapie)

The PFC allows you to adjust all of the ecu parameters, but the boost controller may compromise the reliability and response. If price is the consideration, then the Autospeed design (Norgren valves) boost controller is the go. Do a search there is plenty of data on why.

With just a cat back exhaust and a PFC (with Boost Control Kit) I have seen a couple of RB25's make ~200 rwkw. But regardless of what you do your are always living close to the edge with the ceramic turbine particularly if you are going to do some laps, sideways or not.

Hope that helps

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/50102-rb25-do-up-path/#findComment-996873
Share on other sites

seems not too bad to me..

i wouldn't bother with the AVCR or S-AFC.. you'll only want the full ECU soon enough.

pickup a 2nd hand EBC (other than the overpriced Apexi) for around $350, or just stay with the bleeder I reckon until a bit later. Wouldn't worry too much about the turbo .. just get another when it breaks, you can go though a few before it starts getting expensive. Just maybe run lower boost and wrap the dump pipe to reduce outlet temps.

When my next car gets here, even $300 difference between the bleed valve and EBC I can keep thinking of a few extra things to spend the money on (i.e. some whiteline springs)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/50102-rb25-do-up-path/#findComment-996963
Share on other sites

Thanks guys.

Sounds like the PFC is the better bet. I've heard that the PFC boost controller module is not that good however and some people I've seen seem to be using the PFC and a AVCR. Is this just really high end stuff?

So the general consensus would be stay on the less push side of 12psi? I don't want to kill the turbo till I get an aftermarket one or upgraded one.

Mate i'd be happy to get a intercooler for $150 - Justjap said $650 for GTR cooler and micks metalcraft $1000 for pipes.

LOL thats total and utter garbage 'retail' prices but i hope it's not near what I'd be having to pay.

Other than getting custom FMIC pipes someone must make knock off cefiro pipes surely.

Okay. so PFC + boost controller module is circa $1500 i think. Plus tune.. hmm I'd say that's very much dependant on the availability of a cheap cooler.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/50102-rb25-do-up-path/#findComment-997449
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • From my youth: GTi-R clutch change is a massive pain. The gearboxes are fragile? But the car is super cool and I want one 😢 
    • Remember this is 1988 tech.
    • Driveline vibration is resolved. I ended up loosening all my engine mount and trans mount bolts, giving it a good shake then retightening everything and it's gone... Let's just say I was surprised that fixed it.  I've been happily driving it around again but unfortunately put zero time into my direct port/constant pressure WMI setup. I'm on vacation next week, so I'll try and finalize it then.  On a different note, I spent all week fuel/ignition mapping 2x 216L V16 engines. Turbo's were burning glycol and we swapped them out for larger units. We also had planned emissions testing on site, so I figured I'd be there the same week to use their instrumentation and massage any emissions issues out if needed. This was a first for me. Fuel management is similar in certain ways to automotive (i.e air density as load variable) but very different in others. It's all PLC based and AFR's are controlled by air and not fuel. They use a control valve between the turbo and air manifold to control pressure which in turn controls AFR's. Due to this, target AFR tables supplied by the OEM are in pressures and not mass which really through me off. They use air pressure vs fuel pressure tables. I also relied on an O2 concentration sensor the emissions team had in the exhaust. Ignition timing was also all over the place and we were losing a fair bit of power. They're now happily sitting at 16-40BTDC depending on load. We were making about 1600kw at 900rpm at 90% load. Engines were running a lot smoother as well.    
    • heh, aint no R32 ever meeting modern targa cage rules unless the driver is veeeery short OP, good luck with the sale, since its already in the land of freedom I'm sure you will find a good buyer.
    • meh, it was a good video, clear about the issue and how he dealt with it. A bit heavy on the RTV and very brave to put an RB in anything without rebuilding it first, but otherwise I thought it was good Dose, I'm not sure that having the pickup forward is a big issue; yes of course the oil could shift under brakes but the sump should never be empty enough for that to be a problem (unless you also have a higher volume oil pump, and that oil can't return from the head to the sump quickly enough)
×
×
  • Create New...