Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

just a question for the ill informed

what is the difference between awkw and rwkw?

obviously the rwkw calculation is at the two rear wheels but awkw if at all 4 wheels so is the calcualtion different.

I must admit i am very interested to find out about this.

is anyone can fill me in i would muchly appreciate it

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/50701-awkw-vs-rwkw/
Share on other sites

just a question for the ill informed

what is the difference between awkw and rwkw?

obviously the rwkw calculation is at the two rear wheels but awkw if at all 4 wheels so is the calcualtion different.

I must admit i am very interested to find out about this.

is anyone can fill me in i would muchly appreciate it

When you put a car on a chassis dyno (roller or hub style) there are power losses, in the gearbox, the tailshaft universals, the diff, the driveshaft universals, the wheel bearings, the tyres and the rollers themselves. In a 2wd Skyline (like na R33 GTST) this works out around 50-60 kw, based on the cars we have tested. A couple of which we have also run up on the engine dyno confirm this.

Obviously when you add a transfer case, front diff, front drive shaft universals, front tyres and the extra rollers you loose more power. Around 20-25 kw based on what we see with GTR's.

So if you have a 280 kw engine, it will show around 220 rwkw and 200 awkw.

I should point out that there are no "losses", Newtons law applies, "energy can neither be gained nor lost". So the 60 kw is not "lost" it is transformed into other types of energy, in the car's case that's generally heat.

Hope that is of some help :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/50701-awkw-vs-rwkw/#findComment-1006141
Share on other sites

yeah that makes sense

so basically like when your talking about a rwd drive car and you can make an estimate of rwkw by working out an aprroximate powerloss percentage thru the drive train the same applies in the awd but there is more areas for power loss

btw whats the stock kw at the engine for a 34 model stagea series one and whats the awkw stock as well if you know

:D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/50701-awkw-vs-rwkw/#findComment-1006207
Share on other sites

so basically worst case your going to allow for about 80-90 kw loss on a stagea?

just trying to figure out what i will need to spend to get to my power figure i would like

finally convinced the missus to get an import and the stagea looks like the most logical car for us plus having the awd and turbo is a huge bonus

thanks for the quick replys guys

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/50701-awkw-vs-rwkw/#findComment-1006229
Share on other sites

whats the stock kw at the engine for a 34 model stagea series one and whats the awkw stock as well if you know :D

That's a good question mcnamg. I have seen 185 kw and 173 kw quoted for Stageas. I am going to run ours up on the 4wd dyno next week, while it is standard. I expect to see around 100 awkw. I will then drop the exhaust from the front of the cat and do a quick (and noisy) run to see what's in the exhaust upgrade. If I have time I will stick the Pipercros panel filter in and see what difference it makes at standard power, not much I expect.

I'll post it up when done. :(

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/50701-awkw-vs-rwkw/#findComment-1006230
Share on other sites

In a 2wd Skyline (like na R33 GTST) this works out around 50-60 kw, based on the cars we have tested.  

Just interested with your test data, was it tested using stock clutch or aftermarket clutch? and was it auto or manual? Cos my auto when it was 100% stock was suppose to have 184kw and it made 138rwkw on dyno, so I'd imagine manual example should made well above 140rwkw with a good stock clutch.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/50701-awkw-vs-rwkw/#findComment-1006546
Share on other sites

So if you have a 280 kw engine, it will show around 220 rwkw and 200 awkw.

SK, I dont know how you find the time to contribute so much to this forum!

Thank the great spartan air god you do!

My question is,

if my AUTOMATIC GTS4 made 170 RWKW (AWD fuses Pulled) on the dyno and ran 14.1@98Mph(0-60/2.6) at the drags, what sort of AWD KW do I need to make to get into the high 12's??

And, what would the difference in times be between AWD and RWD(fuses pulled) if I did manage to make 250 AWKW? (My long term goal for my Stock bottom end RB20)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/50701-awkw-vs-rwkw/#findComment-1006584
Share on other sites

Thanks heaps for all the information would be very interested to see what your cars power figures are like when you dyno it

when you post it up post the dyno sheet if u got it

can you also tell us what zorst u are using as well just to give us an idea of whats power it is capable of adding to the car

:P

you seem to be an absolute hive for information. I suppose its good that someone knows this information because if not we would still be trying to translate one of a million japanese car sites to english to figure it out

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/50701-awkw-vs-rwkw/#findComment-1006678
Share on other sites

Just interested with your test data, was it tested using stock clutch or aftermarket clutch? and was it auto or manual? Cos my auto when it was 100% stock was suppose to have 184kw and it made 138rwkw on dyno, so I'd imagine manual example should made well above 140rwkw with a good stock clutch.

Hi rs73, clutch is irrelevant, as long as it isn't slippimg of course. Auto's seem to loose around 10 kw more than manuals, if the torque converter locks up solidly maybe a few less. And lastly, all dyno's are different and climatic conditions make a difference (not withstanding DynoDynamics good attempt with Shoot Out Mode). So your 184 - 138 = 46 kw is well within tolerances.

Data source, we have run 2 X RB26DETT's on the engine dyno and then put them in the GTR and one RB30DET and put it in the GTST. Along with untold Holden and Chevy V8's (both big and small block). Plus over 30 Skylines (standard and modified) on the chassis dyno only. So I am pretty confident the data base is large and the results consistent enough to make a judgement.

Hope that helps :mad:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/50701-awkw-vs-rwkw/#findComment-1007098
Share on other sites

SK, I dont know how you find the time to contribute so much to this forum!

I only sleep 4 to 5 hours a night, take a look at some of the times I post at.

if my AUTOMATIC GTS4 made 170 RWKW (AWD fuses Pulled) on the dyno and ran 14.1@98Mph(0-60/2.6) at the drags, what sort of AWD KW do I need to make to get into the high 12's??

That's a tough call, average power makes more difference than the sinlge max power number and RB20's get narrow in their power band as you move up the max power ladder. I would think 200 rwkw would do it, but it might need 210 rwkw if the auto isn't transferring the power well.

And, what would the difference in times be between AWD and RWD(fuses pulled)  if I did manage to make 250 AWKW? (My long term goal for my Stock bottom end RB20)

My experience (and I am not a drag racer) is the traction from 4wd makes more difference than the power losses by a good factor. Your target of 250 awkw is getting up there for an RB20. That's ~410 bhp, I have only ever seen 1 X RB20 make more than that and it didn't have standard internals. Ours makes 225 rwkw with good average power, it is tricky to get off the line and you really need to be paying attention to keep it firmly in the power band. The auto and 4wd will assist you there.

Hope that is of some help :mad:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/50701-awkw-vs-rwkw/#findComment-1007099
Share on other sites

I only sleep 4 to 5 hours a night, take a look at some of the times I post at. I would think 200 rwkw would do it, but it might need 210 rwkw if the auto isn't transferring the power well.

My experience (and I am not a drag racer) is the traction from 4wd makes more difference than the power losses by a good factor.  Your target of 250 awkw is getting up there for an RB20.  That's ~410 bhp, I have only ever seen 1 X RB20 make more than that and it didn't have standard internals.  Ours makes 225 rwkw with good average power, it is tricky to get off the line and you really need to be paying attention to keep it firmly in the power band.  The auto and 4wd will assist you there. Hope that is of some help :D

Thanks, SK :)

If I can make 12's with only 210AWkW I will gladly reduce my expectations and COST ;)

Its easy to throw numbers around and 250 didnt sound too much to expect from reading ZOOM etc. on their experience with RB20's.

The Auto has been completely rebuilt with kevlar clutches , 2800RPM Stall etc so should do the job and handle any power the RB20 can throw at it.

AS my GTS4 is reg as a GTR I probably should put an RB26 in it and have an Auto GTR! :throwup:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/50701-awkw-vs-rwkw/#findComment-1010488
Share on other sites

attachment.php?attachmentid=22183&stc=1&thumb=1

Yuko, look at the A/F ratios at 60 kph, no wonder ours guzzles the gas. :headspin:

with the mods i got mine clocked 195awhp (145.411awkw) at 10psi.

What mods are there, sorry I know you mentioned it in another thread but I forgot....

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/50701-awkw-vs-rwkw/#findComment-1011002
Share on other sites

attachment.php?attachmentid=22183&stc=1&thumb=1  

Yuko, look at the A/F ratios at 60 kph, no wonder ours guzzles the gas. :headspin:  

 

What mods are there, sorry I know you mentioned it in another thread but I forgot....

Well according to his profile he's got a FMIC and a 3" exhaust... looking at the AFR doesn't look like he's got anything to correct the fuel, and it looks like it would really benefit from it :cheers: Add a bit of boost and it should make a fair bit more power again...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/50701-awkw-vs-rwkw/#findComment-1011088
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • I had 3 counts over the last couple of weeks once where i got stranded at a jdm paint yard booking in some work. 2nd time was moving the car into the drive way for the inspection and the 3rd was during the inspection for the co2 leak test. Fix: 1st, car off for a hour and half disconnected battery 10mins 4th try car started 2nd, 5th try started 3rd, countless time starting disconnected battery dude was under the hood listening to the starting sequence fuel pump ect.   
    • This. As for your options - I suggest remote mounting the Nissan sensor further away on a length of steel tube. That tube to have a loop in it to handle vibration, etc etc. You will need to either put a tee and a bleed fitting near the sensor, or crack the fitting at the sensor to bleed it full of oil when you first set it up, otherwise you won't get the line filled. But this is a small problem. Just needs enough access to get it done.
    • The time is always correct. Only the date is wrong. It currently thinks it is January 19. Tomorrow it will say it is January 20. The date and time are ( should be ! ) retrieved from the GPS navigation system.
    • Buy yourself a set of easy outs. See if they will get a good bite in and unthread it.   Very very lucky the whole sender didn't let go while on the track and cost you a motor!
    • Well GTSBoy, prepare yourself further. I did a track day with 1/2 a day prep on Friday, inpromptu. The good news is that I got home, and didn't drive the car into a wall. Everything seemed mostly okay. The car was even a little faster than it was last time. I also got to get some good datalog data too. I also noticed a tiny bit of knock which was (luckily?) recorded. All I know is the knock sensors got recalibrated.... and are notorious for false knock. So I don't know if they are too sensitive, not sensitive enough... or some other third option. But I reduced timing anyway. It wasn't every pull through the session either. Think along the lines of -1 degree of timing for say, three instances while at the top of 4th in a 20 minute all-hot-lap session. Unfortunately at the end of session 2... I noticed a little oil. I borrowed some jack stands and a jack and took a look under there, but as is often the case, messing around with it kinda half cleaned it up, it was not conclusive where it was coming from. I decided to give it another go and see how it was. The amount of oil was maybe one/two small drops. I did another 20 minute session and car went well, and I was just starting to get into it and not be terrified of driving on track. I pulled over and checked in the pits and saw this: This is where I called it, packed up and went home as I live ~20 min from the track with a VERY VERY CLOSE EYE on Oil Pressure on the way home. The volume wasn't much but you never know. I checked it today when I had my own space/tools/time to find out what was going on, wanted to clean it up, run the car and see if any of the fittings from around the oil filter were causing it. I have like.. 5 fittings there, so I suspected one was (hopefully?) the culprit. It became immediately apparent as soon as I looked around more closely. 795d266d-a034-4b8c-89c9-d83860f5d00a.mp4       This is the R34 GTT oil sender connected via an adapter to an oil cooler block I have installed which runs AN lines to my cooler (and back). There's also an oil temp sensor on top.  Just after that video, I attempted to unthread the sensor to see if it's loose/worn and it disintegrated in my hand. So yes. I am glad I noticed that oil because it would appear that complete and utter catastrophic engine failure was about 1 second of engine runtime away. I did try to drill the fitting out, and only succeeded in drilling the middle hole much larger and now there's a... smooth hole in there with what looks like a damn sleeve still incredibly tight in there. Not really sure how to proceed from here. My options: 1) Find someone who can remove the stuck fitting, and use a steel adapter so it won't fatigue? (Female BSPT for the R34 sender to 1/8NPT male - HARD to find). IF it isn't possible to remove - Buy a new block ($320) and have someone tap a new 1/8NPT in the top of it ($????) and hope the steel adapter works better. 2) Buy a new block and give up on the OEM pressure sender for the dash entirely, and use the supplied 1/8 NPT for the oil temp sender. Having the oil pressure read 0 in the dash with the warning lamp will give me a lot of anxiety driving around. I do have the actual GM sensor/sender working, but it needs OBD2 as a gauge. If I'm datalogging I don't actually have a readout of what the gauge is currently displaying. 3) Other? Find a new location for the OEM sender? Though I don't know of anywhere that will work. I also don't know if a steel adapter is actually functionally smart here. It's clearly leveraged itself through vibration of the motor and snapped in half. This doesn't seem like a setup a smart person would replicate given the weight of the OEM sender. Still pretty happy being lucky for once and seeing this at the absolute last moment before bye bye motor in a big way, even if an adapter is apparently 6 weeks+ delivery and I have no way to free the current stuck/potentially destroyed threads in the current oil block.
×
×
  • Create New...