Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

another sleeper: subaru B4

a good eg:

http://carpoint.ninemsn.com.au/DesktopDefa...lias=carpointau

couldnt tell it has about 206 kw's.

but i think the greatest sleeper of all time has to be the Audi RS8. Looks like a audi staion wagon. but under the hood is a twin turbo V8 with around 400KW's. Only the fat ass tyres and a few little air grills gives away what a monster it is. (well until u start it anyway, that engine note is un belivable) go here to see what i mean www.bb-automobiltechnik.de/ gal_rs4.html

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/53147-sleeper/page/2/#findComment-1045947
Share on other sites

  • Replies 45
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Seen a few over the years.

A few memorable ones were;

A mate of mine bought himself a new L34 Bathurst edition Torana and after it was run in we took it for a blast along the M4 at 2.30 one morning. After we had the thing up to about 235 a dark green 68 mustang pulled along side us. My mate stompped it and he stayed with us till the Torrie would go no more then pulled it back a gear and accerated off into the distance. What impressed me the most the thing looked stock.

Man what a ride !

Another friend of mine had an old E30 van with a 5.7L Cleavland in it, man that thing could could mumbo !

Had an opertunity to but a VW Beetle with a 5.7 in it as well but passed it up cause it was pretty unstable at about 140.

A Nissan Bluebird with a Rover 3.5L V8 in it was choice

The list of nutters goes on !

There what I call sleepers( or Q cars in the good old days when the dinosaurs roamed supreem !)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/53147-sleeper/page/2/#findComment-1045965
Share on other sites

geno8r.

Its subjective.

A sleeper is no doubt in my eyes a stock looking car that is hardly stock under the bonnet. It doesn't matter if its a performance car from the factory or not.

If thats the case the poor old 5ltr HQ Monaro is not classified as a performance car as those things are slower than a VS series II 3.8ltr Commondore.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/53147-sleeper/page/2/#findComment-1045990
Share on other sites

I can see where your both coming from but I tend to think the more classic example is what geno8r is describing.

As far as i'm concerned a sleeper isn't just something that looks stock, but rather it's something that looks slow. I would find it difficult to classify a dead stock looking gtr as a sleeper, no matter how much power it actually has.

Another sleeper volvo:

http://cust.idl.com.au/athol/default.html

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/53147-sleeper/page/2/#findComment-1046043
Share on other sites

ye i agree browny. Basically to me asleeper is a car that looks like it will go real shit but if u ever dragged it, it will rip u to shreads. Like dont matter how stock a GTR would look like, you will always know tis a quick car, now if you get a lancer (a stock pissy little model) and wack in a evo engine and gbox, then that car would be a sleeper cos no one would vere guess it would hammer until you see it go. then there are the opposite of sleepers such as celicas, paseos, fto's and so on.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/53147-sleeper/page/2/#findComment-1046068
Share on other sites

My 1979 TE Cortina is a sleeper. Stock bumpers, still got the 4.1L badges on it. The exhaust is extremely quiet as long as you are under about 7psi or so. The only give away is the FMIC. No wheels just pursuit rims. Engine is a 1JZGTE with the 4 speed auto strengthened and shift kitted, manualised valve body and a 3000rpm stall. Single turbo conversion, 440cc injectors with a halteck. Around 300rwkw.

I was thinking about putting a blanket across the parcel shelf and sticking an old mans Bowler hat in the corner. Then getting some kind of a bowls club sticker to put on the bumper. Possibly might go to the extreme of putting up one of those little louvers/blinds in the back window.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/53147-sleeper/page/2/#findComment-1046129
Share on other sites

I was thinking about putting a blanket across the parcel shelf and sticking an old mans Bowler hat in the corner. Then getting some kind of a bowls club sticker to put on the bumper. Possibly might go to the extreme of putting up one of those little louvers/blinds in the back window.

LOL I love it mate, do it!!! But you gota get who ever you race filmed by a passenger, the look on the face of some punk thinkin he's faster in his holden or any car trying to race you really... :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/53147-sleeper/page/2/#findComment-1046204
Share on other sites

haha the good ol' 1979 TE Cortina..

I had one of those as my first car. Mild 250, holly, cam exhaust 4speed etc.

When I was growing up the TC-TE's were known for being pretty damn quick.

A mate had a TC with a 250 2V head.

That thing went damn hard with mild cam and holly.

Not much apart from a pretty wild VH SLE 5ltr would beat it.

Even then it only 'just' beat it.

The VH was a mates brothers which apparently ran a mid 13 sec pass.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/53147-sleeper/page/2/#findComment-1046215
Share on other sites

I swear everyone one has owned a TC-TE cortina. I get all these people telling me about how well the 250ci cross flow went. Most people who do ask me about it expect it to be a 250ci turbo. I think it was XE Falcons that had a brief run of a turbo model, with the 250ci but I am pretty sure that it was injected.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/53147-sleeper/page/2/#findComment-1046269
Share on other sites

I was thinking about putting a blanket across the parcel shelf and sticking an old mans Bowler hat in the corner. Then getting some kind of a bowls club sticker to put on the bumper. Possibly might go to the extreme of putting up one of those little louvers/blinds in the back window.

That there is the icing on the cake my friend, do it.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/53147-sleeper/page/2/#findComment-1046308
Share on other sites

I think there was only a real limited edition of custom special built 250Xflows in the falcoons... They weren't really released to public though.. Not sure exactly.

I remember talking to a bloke on either this board or skylinesdownunder who owned one. He was talking about how the motors didn't last too long due to the use of forged pistons. Back in the old day of big arse clearances. :rolleyes:

The trick with the old 250xflow was to use the Kidney shape alloy head from the XE (I think it was).

This would bump up the comp and the heads used to flow better and rev harder.

A stock kidney chamber alloy head with the stock webber used to throw a TE 4 speed in to the high 14's... lol.. :D Still not to bad.. Plenty of grunt down low. Excellent burnout machines.

Heheh In stock form I remember mine making peak power at 3800rpm.. lol

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/53147-sleeper/page/2/#findComment-1046333
Share on other sites

I think there were about 200 turbo XE falcons made in conjunction with some racing team. I'm no good at Ford stuff.

I got chopped in Canberra by a guy with a Datto 1600 with SR20DET. He slowed down to let me catch up then did 3rd gear fishies away from me. He had original hubcaps and internal rear louvre. Very stock and original looking.

He also told me he had a faster one at home!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/53147-sleeper/page/2/#findComment-1047287
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...