Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Dont know if anyone can help, but supposing you had 18x10in wheels on the rear and 18x8in wheels on the front of your R33 GTST, would it be illegal?

From the RTA website I believe you can increase the width and diameter by 1in over standard.

My question is, is the standard taken from the model, or series etc? ie is the standard taken from the largest factory wheel size for skylines in general or just GTSTs?

I think Skyline GTRs came with 17x9in from the factory does that cover skyline GTSTs as well?

Im thinking it would be specific to each series of skyline, can anyone confirm this?

Thanks!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/53580-wheel-legalities-in-nsw/
Share on other sites

but I'm pretty sure there is no rule in NSW regarding rim height. You can go 1" wider than what it says on your tyre placard...and skylines have different placards depending on the scheme they were imported under and even different companies that complied them

you are right duncan you can have 20" rims if you like as long as the wheel tyre diameter combo is the same as stock ( they allow about 3% either way i think ) .

as for the width you can only widen the wheels by 1" but the track can only be 1" wider , but who is going to check the track width ?

nah its much easier for the cops.....they just see big wheels and go "bingo! Youve got a defect" See they don't have to be right, they just need "suspicion" that something is wrong....in fact I've even heard of cases where they have been shown the engineers certificate saying it is legal but still defecting the car anyway....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...