Jump to content
SAU Community

The Next GT-R (October '04 update)


Recommended Posts

Thanks R32_GODZILLA :D

Just looking at the first pic I posted, it looks as though the wheelbase has been *shortened* just a bit (maybe 10 - 15mm) as the wheels look pushed forward in relation to the wheelarch... anybody else think so?

Thanks R32_GODZILLA :mad:

 

Just looking at the first pic I posted, it looks as though the wheelbase has been *shortened* just a bit (maybe 10 - 15mm) as the wheels look pushed forward in relation to the wheelarch... anybody else think so?

Agreed.

Styling is certainly subjective, but looking at the most recent three GTRs (being R32, R33, R34), they certainly have presence and agression in frontal styling.

This can never be said for the V35 platform - the front lights give it a startled look... which no matter how you change the front mouldings, guards etc will still look scared.

I give it the thumbsdown on styling - would that scare you out of your lane like an R32 or R34 if you saw that in your rear-view?

Having looked at he V35 Skylines for almost 2 years now, it starts to grow on you.

The current kits available don't make it look as sporty because it retains the centre bracket on the front bar, but still looks sporty.

If people think the V35 doesn't look agressive enough I'm sure someone or MASA will soon have a Z33 front conversion for the next GT-R ;)

But I highly doubt the face will look agressive.

However you have to remember the GT-R is not to be sold to every Tom, Dick and Harry. At a supercar price tag only the older generation will be able to afford this, and they like to blend style with power....thoughts of Aston Martin!

i will never stop crying if the GT-R looks like that, its just so depressing that a skyline, no sorry scrap that, a GTR will end up looking like that.

I really hope these exterior changes Rezz mentioned are a complete bloody overhaul to make it look tough so it strikes fear in fellow drivers (like the r32-34's did). And for goodness sakes dont you people feel we need round stove top tail lights. I mean that should be the first thing that comes to mind when designing a GTR or skyline.

All this fantastic technology ( great sounding engine package, 4wd system or whatever i remember reading) will be wasted imo on a car looking simiilar to V35. I know you get used to the v35 styling over time but it just doesnt capture and absrob you like previous models...

GTRSRULE: IMO is short for "In my opinion".

V8skylineMan: I think you're on the money there... the V35 shell is just that, a shell. The final production-ready GT-R will look alot different. In the new year we're gonna see some good pics released of what we can really expect.

looks as though the wheelbase has been *shortened* just a bit (maybe 10 - 15mm) as the wheels look pushed forward in relation to the wheelarch... anybody else think so?

Yep, a la Z32 300ZX.

If you fit tyres/wheels with a larger rolling diameter, the first place they hit is the rear of the sills, ie front of the rear guards. Not that im comparing the two, but i recall seeing that on John's (from UAS) Z32 racecar. He had cut away the rear of the sill because they were hitting the slicks.(or maybe they had worn away, i dont remember)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yes I can see how that would put you off HFM, especially with the price of good quality brake fluid. From what I understand it as you say the BM50 is the standard BMC for a R32 GTR, I must admit I would like to go far a Genuine Nissan BM57, but lack of cash prevents that at present. With the price being so close between the genuine BM50 and BM57 a BM57 New it seems a better choice as you gain that 1/16 bore size with the BM57, I would be interested in how much difference you feel with the BM57 fitted. I am going to take SteveL's advice in the short term and see how much actually comes out of that proportioning valve vent and save up for the Genuine Nissan part. Thanks for clarifying the HFM failure
    • Thanks mate. I just got the post inspection 1/2 done from state roads when the starter motor packed up, either that or the car alarm system is having trouble.  OEM part number 23300-AA112.
    • Hi, I though I was coming to an end in finding a replacement starter motor for a rb25de neo. I came across a starter motor from Taarks and a message below stating: Direct fit. 11 Tooth count. All below part numbers have been superseded to 11 teeth. Can some body shed some light on going from 8 teeth to 11 teeth apart from 36-month / 25,000 km warranty for passenger vehicles to 12 Month Warranty. Compatible with the following Nissan part numbers: 23300-20P00 23300-20P01 23300-20P05 23300-20P10 23300-20P11 23300-AA111 23300-AA112 23300-AA300 23300-08U10 23300-08U11 23300-08U15  
    • Low battery? Maybe check capacity? I know first-hand, on BMWs if your battery drops below 80% capacity, it starts causing strange issues.
    • 8.5 +37 = should fit rear, but I think it'll hit on front. What you want is low 30s/high 20's front, mid 30's rear. That 17" screenshot you posted looks good, I'd run it on my R32 (but that's long dead now). For tyre sizes, my rule of thumb is: 8': 235, 9": 255. But that's just my opinion. Nismo sizes: 18x8.5+35/18x9.5+38 is a good starting point.
×
×
  • Create New...