Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just looking for advice.

I have installed a profec B (series 1) on my Rb25DET in an R33 4 door with auto and it seems to work OK, but the boost is comming on later than when I had a bleed valve.

It holds boost well, and my dyno graph is smooth and well shaped, (and produces a few more kw than the bleed valve and has a much better shape) but it comes in much later. I have set the ballace to 100% sharp.

Has anyone else come across this or have ideas on how to solve the problem.

PS. Vacume pump is located on the strut tower next to the original boost solioid, and the vacume line is tapped off of the rising rate regulator line (front of plenum)and fed back through the fire wall behind the right wheel.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/55229-profec-b-boost-problems/
Share on other sites

Playing with the sharpness controls can alter when boost comes on.

I wouldn't recommend 100% - After countless adjustment on the road I found that around 1/4 produced some of the best results for my old r33. Every car would vary though. Start at 50% and work up or down from there.

You really need to see when boost rises nicely and best holds at xx psi when you are on full tap. Alternatively if it comes on too quickly it will simply spike, and drop off at high RPM. I could see it exhibiting this on the boost gauge.

Once you find the perfect medium its a great EBC, but I think a lot don't bother playing with this control properly.. which is very important to get the best adjust.

Really need to set it on the dyno - as its pretty dangerous to set on the street and you can only really notice these things under flatout acceleration. I would also note that quite a few places I took it to had absolutely no idea what it was even for :-s

But I have sharpnes set to 100% and boost still comes on LATER than my old bleed valve.

It holds boost perfectly, and has been set up on a dyno, but looking at my old graph and new graph it shows the power is down (through most of the rev range) as boost comes on later.

wreckedhead I am guessing you bave the seec II controler, mine only has a low and high boost button without a readout. Have you been to http://www.greddy.com/ for help. I think there is a pdf that mentions this sort of thing. (you can change the dip switch combination to make an adjustment)

there are 3 vacum lines

2 are from the actuator to the under bonnet unit (???) to the inlet pipe, but the third taps off of the inlet plenum and runs direct to the control unit inside the car (- this is the line I have tapped off of the fuel regulator).

I have used the shortest length lines possible between the inlet pipe and actuator (about 15cm each)

I had no probs with mine.As Predator said start with the balanceat 50% and work from there.I found that about 75% worked best with mine.Sounds like you it all connected up right.What I did with the hose that goes to controller in the cabin was tee into the charcoal canister,I did'nt really what to get it from the fuel reg.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...