Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi,

My spec2 97 model has this exact problem. Stalling frequently whren coming to a stop and idling really roughy. Like the rpm cycles from 1500 rpm down to like 100rpm then back up over and oever and eventually will either stall or stay at about 1000rpm

can anyone suggest what i should do to correct this?

what steps are involved? you suggested cleaning the airbox? please provide some steps, i dont know heaps about cars, only a little bit

  • Replies 110
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest RedLineGTR

Just cleaned it a couple days ago, may of made a bit of difference but not that noticeable got a can of electrical contact cleaner, got a can for about $21 or so dollars, but beware some of the contact cleaners leave a sticky residue, had a little spray on my hand and it disappeared in a couple seconds. Went home pulled the bitch out and started spraying, spraying, spraying...oops used the whole bottle..lolz but at least i could see the color or the actual unit itself. Prop do it once in a while but wouldn't bother doing it like every oil change or something like that.

If people have idle problems as most have on these replies I would recommend some, thoe $21 is a bit of a waste of money but with some testing the engine seems to be finding the correct revs at idle & calculating air entering the system more accurately.

PS. IF you wanna use brake cleaner by all means do if it works fine, my experience with the contact cleaner was great no problems, Just choose the right one. (dicksmith guys that work there a dicks so when they have walked away, try some sprays out for yourself)

Cheers Rob

Guest TTZ32
Originally posted by paulr33

Hi,

My spec2 97 model has this exact problem. Stalling frequently whren coming to a stop and idling really roughy. Like the rpm cycles from 1500 rpm down to like 100rpm then back up over and oever and eventually will either stall or stay at about 1000rpm

can anyone suggest what i should do to correct this?

what steps are involved? you suggested cleaning the airbox? please provide some steps, i dont know heaps about cars, only a little bit

Check the AFM is actually connected:) Maybe it's faulty, also check the coolant temp sensor and connector

Originally posted by RedLineGTR

....but beware some of the contact cleaners leave a sticky residue, had a little spray on my hand and it disappeared in a couple seconds...

Yeah, the one I said Rob, FLUX OFF leaves NO residue either! I cleaned out my mobile and got it working with this stuff ;)

My AFM doesn't seem to be dirty at all ~ yet!

Idle is a tiny bit uneven occasionally but I don't think its AFM related. Most likely due to CAS and idle adjuster being messed with...next dyno session will sort this out though...more than likely

Just for comparison sake, I got some brake cleaner, cost $9 and gave the AFM a quick squirt (a couple of seconds) and it was like new.

If you are having idle probs, it may be more than jsut the AFM, check all hoses that are connected to the plenum/intake pipework, make sure none of the clamps are loose, and check all hoses for damage. Ihad a small crack in a thin piece of rubber pipe where my boost guage was connected, as well as a couple of loose clamps. Sorted these and idle problems disappeared. Also you could try cleaning your AAC valve, as these sometimes cause problems.

it may be worth doing a search about idle, as a few people have had similar probs.

  • 2 months later...
Guest GTSFOUR
Originally posted by RedLineGTR

PS. IF you wanna use brake cleaner by all means do if it works fine, my experience with the contact cleaner was great no problems, Just choose the right one. (dicksmith guys that work there a dicks so when they have walked away, try some sprays out for yourself)

Cheers Rob

Well As A "DickSmith Dick" I find you Harsh generalisation offensive. But AS you are a fellow skyline fanatic i might just let it slide. Guys the best thing you can get is Electrolube Ultrasolve cleaning solvent for these reasons

1. It is exactly the job it is designed for

2. "contact cleaner" also lubricates as it is made for cleaning switches which can affect the way a AFM works

3. cheaper stuff will damage plastic if allowed to sit or used in great amounts

4. Its only $17 so why not

  • 3 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...