Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'D say get the gts4, i used to have one and I had the attesa (4wd system) on a Switch so I could have it either 4wd or 2wd. Fantastic mix of both.

do all gts4's have this attesa system on a switch????? if so then sounds like it is a gts4! if not how much to get it on a switch????

ITs not on a switch. However the system is can be found on the fuse. So its as simple as finding the wires and putting a switch in there. I think you'll find that the system wont reset untill the car is turned off. This means that you wont be able to drive in 4wd then flip the switch and hey presto rwd.

Correct me if i am wrong.

ITs not on a switch. However the system is can be found on the fuse. So its as simple as finding the wires and putting a switch in there. I think you'll find that the system wont reset untill the car is turned off. This means that you wont be able to drive in 4wd then flip the switch and hey presto rwd.  

Correct me if i am wrong.

I met a guy at the SAU vic member sign up bbq a few months back who had set up a switch on his gts4 that let him switch from 4wd to 2wd and back.

I asked him about it not resetting etc and he said that his works perfectly - it switches back and forward fine.

GTS-T .. lighter.. and if you ever want to upgrade later on its much simpler to drop an RB25, do an RB30, or grab any other rb20.. rather than hunt down the 4WD variants (rare)

Also if you ever want to work on your car, less stuffing around with 4WD gearboxes, 2nd diffs, etc.. I had the choice myself when i went to import, but for some of those reasons changed my mind.

Anyhow, depends what you want to do with the car I guess. This may ruffle a few feathers, but if you want 4WD get a GTR :headspin:

Finding a good GTS4 may be hard also, not as many around.

I have a 92 GTS4 and it has side indicators they are put on as part of compliance so most 89 imports under the 15yo rule wont have indicators

If you are looking for mainly drift style driving go the gtst however if you want to drive through mountain roads go the gts4 where the extra traction helps heaps they also hold their value better as they are rarer

I have a 92 GTS4 and it has side indicators they are put on as part of compliance so most 89 imports under the 15yo rule wont have indicators

If you are looking for mainly drift style driving go the gtst however if you want to drive through mountain roads go the gts4 where the extra traction helps heaps they also hold their value better as they are rarer

I wouldnt do much drifting...I prefer good acceleration & handling.

The car i am looking at is a 92 GTS4 Auto, with side indicvators. How do the auto's compare to the manuals?

My mate has a 92 GTSt & it doesnt have side indicators?

My car ia also Auto I find it quite good though technically you are losing a bit of power with the auto then some when its 4wd and its heavier.

Its really up to you whether u like auto or not you can always do a swap if its within your budget

I have only a small amount of mods and have so far put a WRX of my friends with more mods to shame from a standing start thanks to stalling the auto up.

If you want the 4WD then buy a GTR. The GTS4 is too underpowered to give the system justice anyway. It is actually slower than the GTST but better 60FT time. They are more expensive to fix and when you start getting the surging while cruising, it will give you the shits coz the 4WD pump costs shitloads and is a common problem with them. I have driven both and the GTST handles better in the dry than the GTS4. But the GTS4 does better in the wet....by far. Don't ask me why it handles better...it just does. The steering is really hard and the car jumps all over the place where the GTST stays on a much smoother line. All I can say is take both for a drive and be the judge yourself. Don't just take it down the street and back either. Drive it for a good half hour or so, usually the GTS4's float all over the place. The GTS4 will hold it's value for longer than the GTST. The GTS4 will wear out more clutches than the GTST.

Some may disagree with all of this but I only speak from my experience and I don't like to drive them. You should see what I mean when you drive this one. You will feel the difference straight away.

One last point. In my GTST I don't even think about racing people in the wet. It is dangerous for all. I think you would be more proned to doing this in a GTS4 which can only lead to an unhappy ending. But in the end...you be the judge!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
    • In my head it does make sense to be a fuel problem since that is what I touched when cleaning the system. When I was testing with the fuel pressure gauge, the pressure was constantly 2.5 bar with the FPR vacuum removed. When stalling, the pressure was going up to 3.0 bar (which is how it should be on ignition).
×
×
  • Create New...