Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Now thats an evo ^ :headspin:

11's with just the motec? are u sure? :confused: standard evo 8 1/4 times vary alot but majority are 13.3, ecu isnt going to take 1.3 seconds+ off?

you still coming on cruises cam? u gotta let everyone have a look!

How much did it cost btw?

Now thats an evo ^  :headspin:  

11's with just the motec? are u sure? :confused: standard evo 8 1/4 times vary alot but majority are 13.3, ecu isnt going to take 1.3 seconds+ off?

you still coming on cruises cam? u gotta let everyone have a look!

How much did it cost btw?

Well that was what the owner said to me anway.... I know my GTR felt about that much quicker with the motec in it it was incredible the difference....

Yeah I'll still show my head at cruises if you guys let me! hehe

Cost = PLENTY!!

Cheers Cam :(

The sale of my GTR has fallen through, despite the obligatory hand shake, deposit paid etc.....

So if anyone knows of anyone who's interested, let me know please....

I've arranged for pics to be taken & for it to be advertised in the trading post & carpoint thru a dealer client of mine, so we'll see how that goes.

In the meantime, I'll get a pic of my garage:

Left Side R33 GTR V-spec

Right Side EVO 8

hehehehe

Cam

how much are u asking for your gtr?. I ave a mate coming over from england, who would love a gtr but he asked me what they are worth over here and i have no idea. the only problem is he is moving to perth so that may be a problem.

Hey mate,

The for sale thread that I have put here in this forum, I'm asking $45k. But I think that's a bit much. So I'll be dropping it to $42,000.

Have a look at the thread for more details, it's got everything, custom titanium paint job, custom bodykit, 18" Works wheels ($5k alone), cusco coilovers, apexi exhaust & twin tip ($3k alone), high flow turbos etc etc etc

Let us know if your mate is interested as I'm really keen to get rid of it now, so I'll be putting it the trading post and heaps of other places this week.

Cheers Cam

Spotted your new beast in the car park yesterday Cam, had a bit of a squizz, I must have looked like a prospective thief.

Very, very nice, very stealth... well not really.

hehe yeah thanks mate!

You should come up & say hello, I'm on the top floor (accountancy practice)...

Cheers Cam

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...