Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Im bringing my car over the first wek of Feb, fingers crossed with a re-tune and new exhaust ill be pushing out close to 240-250rwkws:) Maybe we dont need the 300cc, but hopefully we dont have wild wheelspin either:)...and fingers crossed it lives and the old $600 RB20 provides plenty of fun:)

heheh.. Not directed at you Roy.. :(

Considering you use your 32 for a lot of track work it does make me wonder if it really is worth building up a motor??? Would you get that much more life out of the rebuilt motor to warrant building it up over cheap second hands. :D

1 rebuilt motor is close to 5-6 second hand motors.

woo up there ice cube..

1. suggestions about my RB24 build.

i have some people to prove wrong.

if i still had my RB25de i would have built a 25/30 a long time ago.

i would love a 30 but i decided to go the 24 route because i just did.

5-6psi more boost will be overcome by higher CR

other than that a 20 sounds better.

DANGEROUS_DAVEO: i prefer beef wrapped in bacon

P.S. MMOOOOOOO

...Considering you use your 32 for a lot of track work it does make me wonder if it really is worth building up a motor??? Would you get that much more life out of the rebuilt motor to warrant building it up over cheap second hands. :(

 

1 rebuilt motor is close to 5-6 second hand motors.

LOL...its part expense, its part value. The track is great fun whether you are doing 1:30s or 1:26s, so if i keep popping RB20s (I suspect from about Feb onwards all the tomm fullery/butchery will be fixed on my car), so not expecting any more problems.

If the engine croaks then ill at least be comfortable that i know the limits of the RB20...i have my thoughts but thats all they are:(

If you want to go genuinely quick the RB20 can do it. But the dollars dont add up and you have to seriously consider stepping up to a bigger RB. BUT... If you want heaps of fun, and not be living in fear of popping/overheating etc etc an RB26 then RB20s rock:)

Dont have to be the quickest, just wear the biggest smile:) So 6-8 grand to get 3-4 seconds quicker, then i think about how many track days 6grand buys me...lol have you seen Pumping Iron where Arnies talks about lifting weights every day is like cumming...well 6 grand is a sh1t load of track days and i suspect it would have a similar effect on me:)

Im in SA for the next 3 weeks, so bring on Mallala:)

If you want to go genuinely quick the RB20 can do it. But the dollars dont add up and you have to seriously consider stepping up to a bigger RB. BUT... If you want heaps of fun, and not be living in fear of popping/overheating etc etc an RB26 then RB20s rock:)

Dont have to be the quickest, just wear the biggest smile:)  So 6-8 grand to get 3-4 seconds quicker, then i think about how many track days 6grand buys me...lol have you seen Pumping Iron where Arnies talks about lifting weights every day is like cumming...well 6 grand is a sh1t load of track days and i suspect it would have a similar effect on me:)

Im in SA for the next 3 weeks, so bring on Mallala:)

Well said there Roy !!

never really looked at it that way but it makes alot of sense.

with RB20s being cheap there is a big gap between rebuilding and a second hand motor costs.

If we were talking RB26, its a shit load more expensive.

Thing is you could theorectically push the stock bottom end pretty far. I think a few of you guys are accepting that they blow up when making a certin power output. I think with a decent tune, you would make the same power but have the engines last a fair bit longer. And well $600 isnt much compaired to a full proper rebuild, but its still a fair wack of money and a fair bit of time wasted changing over the bottom ends.

Exact thing a mate had problems with, bad tune, didnt change anything but pulled out 2deg of timing and the thing never blew up, same power tho.

Thing is you could theorectically push the stock bottom end pretty far.  I think a few of you guys are accepting that they blow up when making a certin power output.  I think with a decent tune, you would make the same power but have the engines last a fair bit longer.  And well $600 isnt much compaired to a full proper rebuild, but its still a fair wack of money and a fair bit of time wasted changing over the bottom ends.

I do not know of a single RB20 with around 240-250rwkws that gets driven on street and track...but i agree about the strength of the RB20,

I suppose this year will be the litmus test, though when the mechanic installed the new engine they didnt throw a new timing belt on the car, and there seems to be some idler bearing noise so may change them too...hate to lose an engine because a mishap up front with ancillaries:(

Unfortunately i don't live within 900kms of a race track, so if something does go bang at the track, it is long way to push my car back home.

My motor was fully rebuilt (std)a few months ago. but my dad put a bit of it together, due to my work commitments. anywho, he didn't check the ring gap cause he thought i did, and i hadn't yet. so the end result is low compression in all, and oil in number 1. hence why i want to do it properly this time.

My new list of parts are: Tomei 82mm pistons

Tomei 1mm head gasket

Tomei cam gears X2

HKS GTRs kit

other stuff: Bore engine

new exhaust gasket

gates timing belt

ECU remap

New rear tyres

ROY: idler bearings are $120 for idler $160 for tensioner i think from memory

its turbo i believe, t66/7. Not exactly sure. Built motor such as pistons rods bearings cams plenum ecu inj pump and other little things.

Roy: from the ones i have seen they just get tired after 300rwhp. Blow starts to occur then knocking then you know finish time. A friend had one with over 300rwhp and standard ecu but with a plug in chip, thrashed 24/7 for a good yr then got tired and blow by then knocking then finished.

a mates mate has an R32 and his RB20 has put out 480hp on the dyno... with 30psi and tolulene... but was prolly C16.

thats some bullshit power... i didnt believe it but apparently its spun up 400+hp on a few dyno's so i just dont know.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
    • I haven’t yet cut the chassis, maybe I switch to a reverse flow. I’ve got the Intercooler mounted as I already had it but not cut yet. Might have to speak to an engineer 
    • Yes that’s another issue, I always have a front mount, plus will be turbo plus intake will big hasstle. I’ve been told if it looks stock they’re fine with it by a couple others who have done it ahahaha.    I know @Kinkstaah said the stock gtt airbox is limiting but I might just have to do that to avoid a defect so it atleast looks legit. Or an enclosed pod so it’s hidden away and feed air from the snorkel and below Intercooler holes like kinstaah mentioned. Hmm what to do 
×
×
  • Create New...