Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Haha nah that was exactly how I recieved the car from Japan with just an airpod and catback exhaust with a straight through pipe added. No tuning involved, just put it on the dyno for two runs to see the power I recieved and thats what I got. Is that result unusually high?

I thought that lower graph the one not showing the hp output was the A/F ratio?

hey dude,

nah thats your boost level. It looks like ur runnin a bit more than 9psi and its runnin out at the top end.

I think you could of asked for an a/f ratio on the side? Most give boost readings, but some give a/f ratios. Some give torque figures... all dynos are different remember dude.

His cars doin what 99% of turbo cars wit no boost controllers do so no worries there :) Even some bleed valves and incorrectly installed/tuned boost controllers drop boost levels down at higher rpm

If you have a stock (small) turbo its very hard to keep it at high boost levels at high rpm remember

Yeah I should have asked for the different printouts.

Was reading the latest issue of HPI with the latest update for there R32 RB20DET. They just got there car dyno tuned and it produced 145rwkw. Mine produced 193hp which is about 144rwkw. Im trying to figure out why this is the case because with a 1rwkw difference they also have a FMIC and GTR injectors.

Is there anything I should be looking for in case something is playing up and producing more power but at the same time damaging it? Like advanced timing? Running rich? Just want to get those things out of the way before going and looking for hidden mods which I havent discovered yet.

Cheers

GTR injectors wudnt do anything extra power wise as standard ones can do that much power as you proved!

Different dynos read differently, some read higher some read lower.

Yes advanced timing would play a part, can get you as easy +- 10rwkw as well as other tuning (as well as other things like engine/turbo condition too!).. i wouldnt worry get hyperdrive to service your car and they will check things over and let you know if anythings up dude :) Lumpy knows his stuff and would let you know if something was up!

Is there anything I should be looking for in case something is playing up and producing more power but at the same time damaging it? Like advanced timing? Running rich? Just want to get those things out of the way before going and looking for hidden mods which I havent discovered yet.

Cheers

Dyno readings from shop to shop vary. Its as simple as that.

Or you could have a chipped ecu?

BUT.. Something looks a-miss.

Is that an Intake temp of 45degree's I can see?

Possibly the intake temp sensor was position incorrectly causing an inflated reading.

Dyno readings from shop to shop vary. Its as simple as that.

Or you could have a chipped ecu?

 

BUT.. Something looks a-miss.

 

Is that an Intake temp of 45degree's I can see?

Possibly the intake temp sensor was position incorrectly causing an inflated reading.

i was wondering about those temps too :(

45 degrees in winter?........

i was wondering about those temps too :P

45 degrees in winter?........

The ambient temp was 28 degrees, in a Perth dyno room, sounds reasonable. Note the car has POD, no CAI or heat shielding mentioned. So +17 degrees (28 to 45) due to hot air through the radiator and into the POD is not unusual.

:(

Bugger that then.. I'll stick with my stock air box + 100mm cai.

I was getting 25degree AT temps & 25degree IT temps with the sensor placed up the CAI poking in to the airbox a little.

Boostworx dyno room is located at the back of a Tin Shed, he does have a big arsed noisy fan though.

The ambient temp was 28 degrees, in a Perth dyno room, sounds reasonable.  Note the car has POD, no CAI or heat shielding mentioned.  So +17 degrees (28 to 45) due to hot air through the radiator and into the POD is not unusual.

:rofl:

So what your saying is that there is no abnormal dyno errors that is making my result seem inflated? And that my result is correct?

So what your saying is that there is no abnormal dyno errors that is making my result seem inflated? And that my result is correct?

Based on what I have seen, Lumpy has no need to give out false readings.:rofl:

So there must be something that I am missing then because if I'm not mistaken I shouldn't be producing that amount of power considering the mods I have. Took the kick panel to see if the ecu was chipped or not. Nothing unusual about it just had the nissan sticker in the corner with a 22 printed in the LH top part of the sticker. Could be chipped but I wouldn't know until I actually removed the ecu and changed it with another one.

What sort of things should I go looking for that may be hidden, giving me extra power?

All of Hyperdrives dyno sheets appear to have a 40+ degree IT with a fairly cool 28degree AT.

Maybe its the positioning of the sensor?

I recently saw a friend mine have his R32 tuned at Boostworx (where I get mine done), bonnet open, pod with no shielding and big fan blowing.

The sensor was placed basically directly behind the headlight in a groove of the pods filter.

The AT temps were 28degree's. IT temps were pretty much always +5 degree's.

I really don't know. :(

Boostworx dyno room is seriously far from being optimal, its a small enclosure with limited exhaust suction that is located towards the back of a larger shed. Bugger all free clean air blowing around. I always leave Boostworx after a tune with my eyes stinging. :(

Their dyno probably reads slightly higher than the norm.

Which is exactly why comparative figures should be taken with a pinch of salt. Do a few mods and watch the gains then be happy. :D

You never know.. It 'may' be running an rb25 turbo or something. :)

So your saying that hyperdrive's dyno is giving a much higher reading than it should be? Also I was comparing my IT result to the HPI RB20DET and they had an intake temperature of 19 degrees. Would my high intake temp reading be enough to offset my actual power output?

The idea of dynamic dyno's temperature compensation is that hotter air will reduce power, cooler air will increase power. The dyno makes a compensation to try and give a constant power level regardless the air temperature.

The dyno has a middle figure. Say 25degree's.

If the IT is over 25 degree's the dyno will apply its calculation and show an increased power level.

Anything under 25degrees and they dyno will apply its calc. and show a decreased power figure.

The aim is to try and keep power levels consistant across air temp differences.

This method is open to 'fiddling' as when the air temp sensor is placed in a location that doesn't indicate the true air temp the engine is ingesting.

I'm not saying your figure is way off as its not. It is around the mark.

After all a stock R32 with only an exhaust will make 135rwkw maybe 140rwkw if its in good nick and the fuel pump isn't supplying too much fuel killing power.

Installing a new fuel pump, I went from 155rwkw down to 130rwkw on 13psi.

12psi made 152rwkw, ebc then dialed in 15psi and it made 164rwkw.

The difference is your making 144rwkw with only 9psi.

Maybe you have a little bit of hidden headwork or possibly a cam gear is out a tooth allowing the motor to breathe easier in the top end, hence only 9 psi!?!? I'm not really sure. :(

Damn.. I'm spamming out this thread.. A mod of this section care to create a new thread out of my dribblings?

The temps definitely sound reasonable then.

Its probably a good thing to tune with the bonnet down. At least you get a semi-real world environment with real under bonnet temps and then you know it won't ping once you get it on the road.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
×
×
  • Create New...