Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

heya,

jus had my r33 gtst S1 dynoed and made 205rwhp (not sure what that is in KW). the car has 3" dump, high flow cat and hks super dragger exhaust, pod, bleed valve set to 9psi, atmo BOV, stock everything else. for the mods i have i thought that this was a pretty healthy power figure, what do you guys think???

will be fitting my hybrid FMIC next week and wind the boost up to bout 12 psi, should hopefully see some good results. :aroused:

cheers!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/58606-does-this-rwhp-sound-right/
Share on other sites

i would think it sounds pretty much right for a series 1. Throw the cooler on and it should increase nicely along with a bit more boost and tune.

My series 1 got 210.4hp and 215.3hp on some recent power runs with pretty much the same mods (difference was i had FMIC and was on 8psi). Was running very rich as well.

oh and mine was auto.

im with Strich9ine, i have a smaller turbo than the stock r33 turbo (dont ask me, owner in jap did it :S)

and i made 215rwhp @ 0.6bar with exhuast (stock dump, aftermarket front pipe) r34 gt-t cooler, bov, air filter, ebc

and my AFR was crazy running to lean (fuel pump)

soo yeah

I got 254hp on 10psi, stock turbo, cooler, stock dump... 200hp sounds low!

dam! mate that is some good stock power! well done. now i don know whether to think mine is below average or your motor is just a freak????? not sure if it was run in shootout mode or not, dyno dynamics dyno....

anyone else wana share there stock power readings?

dam! mate that is some good stock power! well done. now i don know whether to think mine is below average or your motor is just a freak????? not sure if it was run in shootout mode or not, dyno dynamics dyno....

anyone else wana share there stock power readings?

bhp / 1.34 = kw

We have had over 20 X R33 GTS's on our dyno with similar mods and your power output is pretty much the average. After the FMIC, a Power FC would be on my list, with good tuning that should get you to 200 rwkw (270 rwhp). Be carefull at 12 psi, ceramic in the cat is not far away.:)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...