Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

2 in and 4 out.

It flies now, it seems to have got rid of my flat spot around 5000rpm which is where the AFM was maxing out. Im very happy at the moment, stay tuned for some dyno numbers but going by feel, i can certainly feel the difference.

Once installed it ran lean as buggery, so i quickly added some fuel everywhere into it via the SAFC. So at the moment its had a quick road tune but its feeling very quick. I will have it on the dyno next week to accurately tune the A/F ratios.

Once installed it ran lean as buggery, so i quickly added some fuel everywhere into it via the SAFC.  So at the moment its had a quick road tune but its feeling very quick.  I will have it on the dyno next week to accurately tune the A/F ratios.

Ok cool, i mite take it with me to the dyno and swap it over so it gets tuned straight away.

The Z32 is larger in size to the standard one too isnt it? That means new pod filter aswell :cheers:

So 2in4out doesn't change the afm's voltage to what the stock item would have been?

Even though you did this it still needed more fuel to be put in?

How did you know it was running lean?

2in tells me is that the safc is receiving (voltage vs airflow) from (2) a Z32 AFM.

4out tells me that the safc is changing (voltage vs airflow) from (2) a Z32 AFM to (4) a RB20/25 AFM.

So theoretically if you select 2in4out you shouldn't have to change any fuel settings as it would be as if it is still running the RB afm (5v limit would still be at the same vs airflow).

I'm about to do this to a S15 (Z32 AFM).. The reason for all the questions. :rofl:

So 2in4out doesn't change the afm's voltage to what the stock item would have been?

Even though you did this it still needed more fuel to be put in?

How did you know it was running lean?

 

2in tells me is that the safc is receiving (voltage vs airflow) from (2) a Z32 AFM.

4out tells me that the safc is changing (voltage vs airflow) from (2) a Z32 AFM to (4) a RB20/25 AFM.

 

So theoretically if you select 2in4out you shouldn't have to change any fuel settings as it would be as if it is still running the RB afm (5v limit would still be at the same vs airflow).

 

I'm about to do this to a S15 (Z32 AFM).. The reason for all the questions. :rofl:

Its called pinging. Ive added some more fuel in and its not pinging any more. A dyno test should give me the correct answers.

So 2in4out doesn't change the afm's voltage to what the stock item would have been?

Even though you did this it still needed more fuel to be put in?

How did you know it was running lean?

 

2in tells me is that the safc is receiving (voltage vs airflow) from (2) a Z32 AFM.

4out tells me that the safc is changing (voltage vs airflow) from (2) a Z32 AFM to (4) a RB20/25 AFM.

 

So theoretically if you select 2in4out you shouldn't have to change any fuel settings as it would be as if it is still running the RB afm (5v limit would still be at the same vs airflow).

Yeh thats what i was thinking

so its the same physcial size as the rb25 afm? sweet :headspin:

Maybe as the standard AFM was maxing out, it wasn't getting the optimum tune at those rpms. Now with the AFM reading, the computer is giving me a decent tune, hence why the 5000rpm flat spot has gone. Im running a HKS 2530 and im seeing some strong results, though i reckon you would gain some benefits with the stock turbo.

Its called pinging. Ive added some more fuel in and its not pinging any more. A dyno test should give me the correct answers.
The Rb30DET in mine takes until around 13.5:1 before it starts pinging.

Even then at high rpm the knock sensor doesn't pick up pinging, only during lower/mid rev's.

A definate ping can be heard once is hits 14:1, then it fuel cuts.

What I'm getting at is pinging is the last thing you notice when it is leaning out.

Robo, You still didn't really answer my question.

So the AFM reading on the SAFC is definately reading lower with the 2in4out?

Before it may have been hitting say 100% at 5500rpm not it is maybe 80%?!?!?

 

Robo, You still didn't really answer my question.

So the AFM reading on the SAFC is definately reading lower with the 2in4out?

 

Before it may have been hitting say 100% at 5500rpm not it is maybe 80%?!?!?

Just about to go for a test drive, i will let you know about the 100% flow.

Sometimes my SAFC changes to pressure and it takes some fiddling to get it too show Air Flow %.

Just about to go for a test drive, i will let you know about the 100% flow.

Sometimes my SAFC changes to pressure and it takes some fiddling to get it too show Air Flow %.

I really am interested if the safc changes the voltage back to std as it may be quite a bit of a pain in the arse if I fit it to the s15 then find out i can't drive it.

Especially considering the s15 has a 45mm little hole for the afm. :rofl:

It may throw it out quite a lot more.. BUT if the safc does the adjustment and returns the voltage back to normal then it may be ok.

I really am interested if the safc changes the voltage back to std as it may be quite a bit of a pain in the arse if I fit it to the s15 then find out i can't drive it.

 

Especially considering the s15 has a 45mm little hole for the afm. :rofl:

It may throw it out quite a lot more.. BUT if the safc does the adjustment and returns the voltage back to normal then it may be ok.

The settings for a S15 is In 05 and out 05. When connecting a Z32 too it, the settings will be IN 02 and out 05.

Car is running very strong. Im running around 17psi with the HKS 2530, SAFC2 and Z32. I have seen a little more on cold nights.

My dyno man is currently getting his dyno recalibrated so hopefully this week i will be able to fine tune the mixtures and maybe see how much boost it can handle.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Driveability will be about the same with either externally venting BOV, or no BOV at all. Perhaps worse one way than the other, with me thinking that the definitely more flow going through the AFM through a venting BOV more likely to cause rich stalls than the perhaps more flow that the AFM might read on reversion. There is no such thing as "turbo damage" from not having a BOV at stock, or even quite a lot higher than stock, power levels. You need a big turbo with a lot of mass spinning hard getting a horrible slowdown from a slammed shut throttle before there is anything like the shaft loads required to damage things. Not an issue on small turbos. The ONLY 2 reasons that Nissan put a recirc valve onto the RB were: It is a bypass valve. It is open when under vacuum. When not on boost, it bypasses intake air forward around the compressor, which unloads the compressor, allowing the turbine to sping more freely, making the whole lot a bit more efficient when just puddling around. Throttle response should also be faster via the shorter, smaller diameter BOV pipe (when in NA, ie before the BOV closes and boost is building) which is nicer for driveability. Emissions. The reversion causes CO pulses. Eliminate the reversion (or at least, keep it away from the AFM) and you don't get that. The stalling/driveability aspect could have been tuned around, as shown one example of by dose above, if Nissan hadn't put a recirc valve on. Many many turbo engines before the RB had no BOV. They did not stall. See the RB30 turbo as an example. Nistune is definitely better than just stock ECU. It allows you to access and change things that are not excellent on the stock setup, and allows you to do mods like put decent injectors in, relocate the AFM, put a bigger turbo or even cams, etc, on, change to coil swith completely different swell needs, etc etc. All the things that you might need or want to do 25 years after the car was new. Aftermarket replacement ECU is obviously better again, because it gives you even more freedom from the constraints of the stock ECU. I won't be needing to go any further than Nistune though, for the new turbo in the 250ish rwkW region I'm going to, with big injectors, and most other things being stockish.
    • Lucky the prp block is supposed to be released next weekend 
    • Wow guys thank you very much for the HUGE info :-) @GTSBoy I have like 30 minutes if test drive with that car/engine and it not stalled once. IMO it ran very smooth so i guess it was not that bad(but asi i said it is stock) That atmo BoV is worse than no BoV or in my case or it is/will be the same? Cuz frankly i rather have little whooosh sound than that sututu 馃槃 But either way the less harmfull for engine/turbo the better(if the stock is not an option right away) Yeah about that rebuild i talk with guy who will be doing swap and custom pipes...i think i can get stock BoV or get aftermarket which will function the same. Yeah i looked at that R35 option and i try ask my mechanic more about that if he knows. The engine has stock ECU but i can get Nistune for it. On that stock it runs quite well...but i have limited time with it so rly dont know. Ecumaster is this https://www.ecumaster.com/  It is not some dodgy backyard ECU :-)  @MBS206 Yeah but it will be better to have Nistune than the completely stock ECU no? About that "same" atmo/no BoV. The drivebility would be the same? I dont know but i kinda guess that amto BoV would cause more problems than no BoV in my case? Or is the same? You just "change" one sound for the other? Yeah i read many many many topic about hurting the turbo. But no one know anybody that would 100% tell that his turbo/engine blows/get damaged by not running BoV. Of course turbo would be little happier IMO if it has BoV ..but if you do not trash i think i should be good. And as you can see iam already trying to get this right...just working what i have right now :-) Yeah iam kinda the same...i dont want nothing loud and frankly iam not liking that sututu noise that much 馃槃 i rather have little bit of "whooosh" or no sound at all. Of course in my case it si a completely another world when you came tu Turbo car with open air box and no BoV and you driving the N/A ...all i hear is engine. Here? I heard turbo/sucking and that sututu 馃槃 @Yeetus So in my case it is really no difference to run no BoV or some atmo BoV like GReddy FV2? The car would drive the same and has "the same" little problems? As i wrote above i kinda thinked that atmo BoV with stock MAF would cause more problems...but then again i dont know much about no BoV either :-)  So to avoid stalling i "cant" just put neutral on stop lights like from higher rpm? Or? Yeah iam already looking for ECU :-)  Yes iam at the same side with thar R35 MAF :-)  @Dose Pipe Sutututu Thank you i (my mechanic/tuner) will look into that) Guess iam taking the Nistune at least :-) 
    • Here's the workaround with Nistune I was talking about, just add in more timing on the decel table And play around with the fuel cut & recovery, it's enough to stop it from stalling on a decel  
    • Hi Apex and welcome! 
  • Create New...