Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys - new here - lookin to buy my first RB25DET, but a family man so going for a series2 Neo6 tiptronic Stagea.... a bit of a car noob,and I posted the following request for advice in the Stagea section but hoping some Skyline owners can help me with the pros and cons of 4WD vs RWD...

--------

Just about to finalise stuff for buying my 1998 Stagea... but just seen advertised today 2 newly complied 2000 year Stageas - but they are RWD (2000 year ones starting to come through yay)...

Now I am fairly lost when it comes to cars - so would love your thoughts on pros and cons, and an opinion on what ud buy if u were me out of the following choices... ALL under 50,000kms and pristine condition...

1. 1998 Stagea 4WD stock standard

2. 2000 Stagea RWD with 18inch Nissan 5-spoke 350Z rims and only 15,000kms... EXTRA $4000 purchase price probably over 1998 one

3. 2000 Stagea RWD stock standard with factory electric leather seats/woodgrain etc ... prob extra $4000 over the 1998

I can obviously see the differences not related to RWD / 4WD ... eg for the price of Option 1 + $3000 for a good set of rims/tyres/lowering I could just buy the newer one with 350Z rims already there, or the electric leather seats one and wait a year to afford rims (and always be a year behind on affording other mods)... so thats more a personal choice (but would still love to know your preference) - but I am most wanting input on the 4WD vs RWD and year of manufacture/kms pros and cons...

Feedback over weekend before its too late on the current deal Iam doing on the 1998 would be MUCH appreciated... what are the pros and cons u can come up with 4 me to mull over - weight / performance / parts & servicing / safety / future resale / etc etc?????

My intended applications are for a moderately modded engine daily city driver - kids in the back - with the (very) occasional towing of a small box trailer or MAYBE (not a decisive factor) a small boat in and out of boat ramps and of course SAU cruises!

Thanks!!

Adam

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/60634-purchase-advice-4wd-vs-rwd-stagea/
Share on other sites

the 4wd drive will be heavier and offer less stock performance , although better in the wet

also the 4wd systems are more complex and therefore expensive

id get the newest car you can afford . rwd is fine for 99% of driving situations and more fun anyway

Hmmm thanks Arkon...

The occasional bit of "fun" would be nice... but was told i can shift the 4WD to RWD by simply plugging and unplugging a fuse or more reliably getting a new computer to make it a programmable torque switch for the occasional bit of rear wheel fun ... although carrying 150kg more weight - but then again maybe weight could be offset by $1500 extra performance mods with the savings on the 4WD sale price... Plus with the Atezza 4WD i have a much easier option IF like years down the track I went to drop in a RB26DETT ....

argghh brain strain!! ...Thanks Arkon - others want to help me out a bit too please :D

personally i'd go for the 4wd ...

the r33 i have at the moment sometimes struggles for grip in the dry !

rwd is fun for 'drifting' it out, but as we all know, drifting is not exactly the fastest way around a corner ...

just my 2c

Hmmm thanks Arkon...

The occasional bit of "fun" would be nice... but was told i can shift the 4WD to RWD by simply plugging and unplugging a fuse or more reliably getting a new computer to make it a programmable torque switch for the occasional bit of rear wheel fun ... although carrying 150kg more weight - but then again maybe weight could be offset by $1500 extra performance mods with the savings on the 4WD sale price... Plus with the Atezza 4WD i have a much easier option IF like years down the track I went to drop in a RB26DETT ....

argghh brain strain!!  ...Thanks Arkon - others want to help me out a bit too please :D

yea its all good , i dont really think 4wd vs rwd is that much of an issue . there a pros and cons for both .

rwd - cheaper , less drive train loss , lighter , drift

4wd - easier traction

rb26dett will be a bit of work on stagea from what ive read due to the auto gearbox and hand brake configuration , even if it is 4wd . and you gonna have a lovely rb25det neo in there anyway , id just work that up .

the fuse trick may or may not work . Ive heard r33/34 gearboxes have problems if you do it but im not 100% sure on the details and it only works on a 32 . so it might not be applicable to the stagea . but a atessa controller should be fine if you can find one that suits the stagea .

like I said id get the best condition , highest factory spec , latest model car you can afford . You can add stuff like rims and mods and everything later but you only get 1 go at the base car and youll have to deal with that for ever .

Thanks Arkon and Tang0... good info...

Ive been mulling it over heaps, and even phoned some tune shops etc today and I think I will go for the 4WD 1998... it is the best deal I can find at the moment by far in a Series 2 Stagea with the Neo6 - so should all be good - cant wait for all the paper-work to be finished with and to get the car in my driveway!

Cheers for taking the time to respond!

Adam

PS The series 2 Stagea 26dett conversion shouldnt have probs with auto gearbox coz the spec2 has the tiptronic auto same as the R34 skylines (not the standard auto of the series 1 stageas). An couple of stagea owners already converting the footbrack to handbrakes - so should be ok - but thats years away anyway when Ive had my fun with the Neo :D

the triptronic r34 wont fit the rb26dett . and even if it did it would die very quickly about 250rwkw is their limit in the 34gtt and a mild rb26 will start to push that out very quickly . its not that much of a difficult conversion tho , just a bit more expensive because of extra parts needed for the handbrake conversion , interior modification . but you will definely need a gtr manual gearbox for the conversion .

but the 25 neo rocks anyway the ecus are remapable allowing you to run lots of power with large injectors/afms and keep control of your auto which is not possible in the series 1 non neos.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I will rebutt this and the preceding point from Dose....but without doing any calcs to demonstrate anything and without knowing that I am right or wrong. But... The flow capacity of a fluid transfer system is not limited by the smallest orifice or section of conduit in that system, unless it is drastically smaller than the rest of the system. OK, I use the word drastically perhaps with too much emphasis, but let's drill down on what I really mean. The flow capacity of the system is the result of the sum of the restrictions of the entire system. So, to make an extreme example, if you have a network with 3" pipe everywhere (and let's say a total length of only a few metres) and that 12mm ID restriction of the oil filter connection being the obvious restriction, then for any given amount of pressure available, the vast majority of all the pressure drop in the system is going to occur in the 12mm restriction. But.... increase the length of the 3" pipeline to, say 1000m, and suddenly the pipe pressure loss will likely add up to either be in the same order of magnitude, possibly even exceeding that of the 12mm restriction. Now the 12mm restriction starts to matter less. Translate this to the actual engine, actual oil cooler hose sizing, etc etc, and perhaps: The pressure loss caused by flowing through the narrow section (being the 12mm oil filter port, and perhaps any internal engine oil flow pathways associated with it) is a certain number. The pressure loss through, say, -12 hoses out to the cooler and back is negligible, but The pressure loss through -10 hoses out to the cooler, at the exact same length as the above, starts to become a decent fraction of the loss through the 12mm stuff at the filter port. Maybe even it starts to exceed it. I could actually do these calcs if I knew 1) how much oil was actually flowing in the line, 2) gave enough of a f**k to do things that I hate doing for work, voluntarily for a hypothetical discussion. Anyway - I reiterate. It's not the narrowest port that necessarily determines how much it can all flow. It is the sum. A long enough length of seemingly fat enough pipe can still cause more loss than a semmingly dominant small bore restriction.
    • To pick up what Dose is putting down. Not a lot of point running a huge hose if the motor is still restricted to the smaller size... It's only capable of flowing so much at that point...   *Waits for GTSBoy to come in and bring in the technicalities of length of pipe, and additional restriction from wall friction etc etc*
    • Hooley Dooley these things have some history! If i sell them they will need a certificate of providence to prove they have been in the hands of verified RB20 royalty! They have been stored in a plastic tub, away from sunlight and moisture. They are in mint condition. And they will stay that way, as i have sprung the money for a set of shockworks coilovers. I'm just working on getting them in at the moment, after rebushing the rear of the car, and while the subframe was out i welded in the GKtech reinforcement bracing as well.  They will get a workout at Ararat King of The Hill in November. I ran 48s on the short course there a few months ago, and i am hoping with new bushes and shocks in the rear i can launch a bit harder. There was a fair bit of axle tramp when i tried too hard off the line. a few of the corners had dips mid way which also made the car feel a bit unsettled, hopefully this will help there too.   
    • Food for thought, the stock oil filter thread is a 3/4-16 UNF, which has an ID of about 10 to 12mm (according to ChatGPT lol). Now compare than to an 10AN, which has an ID of about 14mm (Raceworks is 14.2mm, Speed flow is 14.27mm).  
    • Yep, totally get that. However hooking in for Generator back up is only a few hundred bucks for the wiring. You could put a couple of those in (for different circuits explicitly) and run a couple of baby generators. Bonus, you can balance them across different circuits, and now have backups in your backup. I'm looking at buying places that won't even have water etc, and I don't mind the idea of getting off the electric grid either, even with everything you've said. This country already has enough power outages that even the mains grid isn't that reliable anymore. I do agree though on spending a bit more to get better gear, and to add some extra redundancy in to the system too.
×
×
  • Create New...