Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

NP! - Cheers - Well the forecast is calling for 30+ degrees, dunno how quick I'll be with that much heat! :)

LOL - 5 seconds! I WISH i was that fast :cool:

matt

Originally posted by meggala

thanks for the back up Matt see you Sunday I hope you run well.

I'll givbe you a run if you give me 5 seconds start  

:)  

meggala

Not too sure - It IS possible to retain the idle control - however, they'd have to graft it onto the aftermarket plenum - and I imagine that'd cost $$$.

Biggest benefit I see with going aftermarket, is you don't get the heat soak that the pipes get when they're run across teh top of the motor... But that's only a real issue if you're sitting in traffic all day :)

Cheers,

matt

Originally posted by franks

in regards to the idle control component, from memory, hills were saying they do retain it - now wether i was misinformed, heard incorrectly or not knowing what im talking about is another story :cool: is it impossible to retain the idle control component on a custom plenum?

the message is very clear in what your saying. and that is, plenums are only beneficial with big HP and could, in some cases, cause more problems than anything.

i guess the answer i was looking for was wether or not the crossover piping is insignificant in terms of response. from the comments here it seems as though it isnt that bad....but i guess its just an age old thought that the additional piping is going to be significant...

The G-reddy/trust Plenum , provides better flow and hence power/torque and fuel ecconomy than the stock unit when fitted in conjunction with a front mount.

I think its a worth while one for those people (like me) looking to improve on what the factory did wrong.

Like :

Exhaust / filter / flywheel / thermal insulation / intercooler.

All these can yeild a power and fuel ecconomy bonus. Fuel ecconomy ones help pay back the cost somewhat over 1million years.

About $1350AUS for the trust plenum including delivery from japan from taka's. I wouldn't buy the aussi ones given they cost more and are no where near as well designed.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Oof. One of my mates has an R34 GT-R that he initially was a "I want to go twins for response and convenience" on his stock 2.6 with Kelford 272 cams, but his friends are pests and were always in his ear about their place being in the bin.   Eventually one of the 2860-5s decided to add it's own input and force his hand, so he conceded and went for a Pulsar 6262G ("G35 900") with T4 0.85 hotside.    Here's an overlay of the results, same cams, same stock bottom end, same boost, same fuel, just from a pretty tidy 2860-5 install to a Pulsar turbo on a 6boost maniifold on BP98.   Worth mentioning here, it may seem like a dead horse thing but the dyno plot doesn't tell the story of how much better it is to drive - transient response has completely changed the car, he used to have flat foot shifting to stop it having to wind up again on gear changes even at >7000rpm... now it builds boost faster than that even short shifting.   It's 100% transformed the car before you even consider how much better it holds on: Pulsar and Garrett aren't the same, but from our experience if you're just looking for a better drive and the ability to make the same or more power I think the divided G30 770 would probably be the smallest I'd go to.
    • Great work Duncan, any events local you will give it a test once all done? 
    • Sweet, yeah hoping stock gears will hold up. May use the transbrake feature on hill climb starts so that will test it.
    • Yeah, the thread is only nearly 20 years old.
    • Been down in Tassie for 2 weeks (a cruise, not a race for once) but spent a little time on her when I got back. I worked out the injector settings in the PowerFC were not correct for nismo 555s, set those to 66% +10ms and added a little air at closed throttle, set the timing (approximately, because it has some weird non 15o cells around idle) and now she starts and idles properly. She purrs like a kitten (ignore the co2 alarm in the background, I did  ) 20250518_171052.mp4 Next step, off for run-in, tuning and alignment!
×
×
  • Create New...