Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all i'm in the process of modifing the RB25DET.All i need now is a few parts then its all complete for now.

What i've got is a RB25DET with Stock internals

Hi-flow XTR turbo stage2,

Full 3'' turbo back

Cold air with pod

Z32 meter

Power fc + h/control

single stage boost controller

Bosch 010 Fuel pump

coming is injectors about 555cc i think any ideas

Do i need a fuel regulator and surge tank Im not sure on this level but ideas would be appreciated.What sort of power would i expect to get from these mods

Cheers all Rick

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/61242-ideas-on-power-output/
Share on other sites

Youll need bigger injectors to get over 220rwkw

You wont need a fuel reg if you got descent fuel pump and larger injectors.

Cant see why you wouldnt get 250rwkw with that setup if done properly.

Wouldnt run much more than about 1.2bar with standard head gasket/internals aswell just to be safe.

My R33 turbo has just let go of its compressor and turbine blades.

I think I will go a high flow from GCG in Sydney.

I was quoted $1950 today!

I thought it could be done for about $1200 - $1300?

Cheers

Around $1,200 is more like the plain bearing hi flow price. Around $1,800 is the ball bearing hi flow price. My preference is always ball bearing.:(

lol maybe :(

try and say that on silviansw.com and they would laugh at him though

That's 4 cylinder territory, so ~180 rwkw is their limit. RB's have 50% more injectors (6 versus 4) so I don't see any problem. In fact I have seen an RB25 make ~260rwkw on S15 injectors, so it is not only the theory that supports it.

i thought s14 injectors are 375cc and s15 injectors are 480cc~~~!!!??? correct me if i'm wrong

I am no SR expert, but my understanding was JDM S14 manuals were ~444 cc's (red'ish top) the same as S15 manuals. Autos and S13's are ~375cc's (purple'ish top).

There is some debate over 444cc's versus 480 cc's, which I will try and resolve next week when I get a set to clean and flow test.:(

steve from sst tuned my car and the best it ever pulled was 330 hprw running std pump injectors ,it run very unstable as there were some other issues that still need to be sorted (haltech)

huge spikes prevented us from stable tune

it run at that rating for some months so i guess it can be done

but the inj ,pumps are getting done soon (bosch,mazda rotory inj)so we will see how she holds

i am now running 2oo rwkw with the worst midrange u could have , everything kicks in at the end now but steve made it safe so as not to blow(without sacrificing the fun factor to much)

fmic/haltech ecu/twin yamo/hks 2540/apex avc-r/sau sticker(adds 250kw)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...