Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Very nice unit! But no one here can say 'buy it'. If its in your budget, has all the featues you need now and even in the future if you up the size of your install. And do you like the look of it? You would be surprised how many stereos dont sell cos of their looks.

PS - I'd buy it! :(

My mate recently bought the CDA9833 and he couldnt be happier with it!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/61605-alpine-9835/#findComment-1163194
Share on other sites

I got a 9835 in my line... One of the best units ive had!!!! Has so many features, and yet, the sound clarity is amazing just running speakers of the head unit... Was originally going to run a 4ch amp for all the speakers, however i sold it off as there was no use!

The 9835 is a great unit, and if you have WMA/MP3, it allows you to scroll through the songs to select the song you were after (browsing file names).

I bought mine off Ebay which got sent from America.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/61605-alpine-9835/#findComment-1163412
Share on other sites

yea its on ebay for generally about 650 + about 60 of postage.

i have no problems with the looks.

it has like 512 different colours for the buttons though.

anyone had bad experiences.

like the unit having TOO many functions? :headspin:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/61605-alpine-9835/#findComment-1163581
Share on other sites

HUH? The IVAD300's screen quality isnt as good as the CDA9835? Did i read that correctly?

I dare say you've got a faulty D300 there mate, as the D300's picture quality is second only to the D900...ive compared both units side by side actually, and the difference is noticable, but by no stretch of the imagination is the quality of the D300 poor.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/61605-alpine-9835/#findComment-1168645
Share on other sites

my friends got the 9831, and that too is excellent...i love the motorised face...and soooo many functions!...i dont even know half of it!!... sound quality is crisp too..if all these +++ comments were from the 9831, then the 9835 has to be crazyYy! :wassup: :flamed:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/61605-alpine-9835/#findComment-1169764
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...