Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

your stock boost gauge may have a leak in the hose... mine had this problem and didnt read properly (not that i used it) but yeah, fsck the stock gauges, get an aftermarket one that reads over 7psi =)

The stock Meter does not measure the boost in Psi, its in Mhg(?) dont know what the conversion is

How does a larger exhaust explain the turbo running more boost than the actuator is rated at?

 

I don't think any one 'really' knows what the stock RB20DET actuator is rated at do we.

 

Its all speculation.

 

Even if we were to test it how would we determine it unless we were to get out hands on a bran spankin new actuator.

The fact is it does't matter what the actuator opening pressure is, its the actuator (assuming no controller) that sets maximum boost pressure not exhaust back pressure. But back pressure does affect total engine air/ gas flow. ie.more power.

Boost pressure is just a result of the "restriction" that the engine causes to the compressor discharge flow volume/mass. more restriction for a given flow rate = higher boost pressure.

Extreme example take your 2530 and bolt it onto a 1.3 litre engine. It would probably be happy pumping 2 bar or more into a tiddler of an engine like that.

Now take the same 2530 and strap it on top of a 7 litre V8. At high revs it is quite possible that the V8 would be trying to suck air through the turbo because it was trying to swallow more air than the poor "little" turbo could pump.

P.S. I would hate to see the shaft speed in the second scenario!!

2530 is probably a little small for an RB25 if you want high power at the top end. 2835 would be better but the 2530 would have a hell of a mid-range.

Boost pressure is just a result of the "restriction" that the engine causes to the compressor discharge flow volume/mass.  more restriction for a given flow rate = higher boost pressure.  

 

Extreme example take your 2530 and bolt it onto a 1.3 litre engine. It would probably be happy pumping 2 bar or more into a tiddler of an engine like that.

 

Now take the same 2530 and strap it on top of a 7 litre V8. At high revs it is quite possible that the V8 would be trying to suck air through the turbo because it was trying to swallow more air than the poor "little" turbo could pump.  

 

P.S. I would hate to see the shaft speed in the second scenario!!

 

2530 is probably a little small for an RB25 if you want high power at the top end. 2835 would be better but the 2530 would have a hell of a mid-range.

Yeah mate you,re dead right, there seems to be the odd the sphincter of the universe spouting crap when, in there position they should know better. Nice too here from some knowelgable people.

The fact is it does't matter what the actuator opening pressure is, its the actuator (assuming no controller) that sets maximum boost pressure not exhaust back pressure. But back pressure does affect total engine air/ gas flow. ie.more power.

Sorry Buddy...

Wasn't really a question.

I was trying to understand where PTR33 was coming from.

The stock dump may be a restrictive POS it aint gonna restrict it from getting to wastgate actuator opening pressure.

I wasn't thinking so much VE but more so turbine efficiency and how it directly relates to shaft speed which then relates to the turbo's airflow that relates to the pressure required for that airflow to enter the motor.

This is where the increase in boost comes from, better turbo efficiency.

What happens when you drop the exhaust from a car? Turbine efficiency is improved dramatically.

Dropping the exhaust from my RB30DET with the stock turbo & wastegate jammed all the way open saw boost hit ~10psi with possibly another .5-1psi more if it was rev'd harder.

Fit the exhaust back up, jam the wastegate open and it only saw 6.5psi by ~5000rpm.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I myself AM TOTALLY UNPREPARED TO BELIEVE that the load is higher on the track than on the dyno. If it is not happening on the dyno, I cannot see it happening on the track. The difference you are seeing is because it is hot on the track, and I am pretty sure your tuner is not belting the crap out of it on teh dyno when it starts to get hot. The only way that being hot on the track can lead to real ping, that I can think of, is if you are getting more oil (from mist in the inlet tract, or going up past the oil control rings) reducing the effective octane rating of the fuel and causing ping that way. Yeah, nah. Look at this graph which I will helpfully show you zoomed back in. As an engineer, I look at the difference in viscocity at (in your case, 125°C) and say "they're all the same number". Even though those lines are not completely collapsed down onto each other, the oil grades you are talking about (40, 50 and 60) are teh top three lines (150, 220 and 320) and as far as I am concerned, there is not enough difference between them at that temperature to be meaningful. The viscosity of 60 at 125°C is teh same as 40 at 100°C. You should not operate it under high load at high temperature. That is purely because the only way they can achieve their emissions numbers is with thin-arse oil in it, so they have to tell you to put thin oil in it for the street. They know that no-one can drive the car & engine hard enough on the street to reach the operating regime that demands the actual correct oil that the engine needs on the track. And so they tell you to put that oil in for the track. Find a way to get more air into it, or, more likely, out of it. Or add a water spray for when it's hot. Or something.   As to the leak --- a small leak that cannot cause near catastrophic volume loss in a few seconds cannot cause a low pressure condition in the engine. If the leak is large enough to drop oil pressure, then you will only get one or two shots at it before the sump is drained.
    • So..... it's going to be a heater hose or other coolant hose at the rear of the head/plenum. Or it's going to be one of the welch plugs on the back of the motor, which is a motor out thing to fix.
    • The oil pressure sensor for logging, does it happen to be the one that was slowly breaking out of the oil block? If it is,I would be ignoring your logs. You had a leak at the sensor which would mean it can't read accurately. It's a small hole at the sensor, and you had a small hole just before it, meaning you could have lost significant pressure reading.   As for brakes, if it's just fluid getting old, you won't necessarily end up with air sitting in the line. Bleed a shit tonne of fluid through so you effectively replace it and go again. Oh and, pay close attention to the pressure gauge while on track!
    • I don't know it is due to that. It could just be due to load on track being more than a dyno. But it would be nice to rule it out. We're talking a fraction of a second of pulling ~1 degree of timing. So it's not a lot, but I'd rather it be 0... Thicker oil isn't really a "bandaid" if it's oil that is going to run at 125C, is it? It will be thicker at 100 and thus at 125, where the 40 weight may not be as thick as one may like for that use. I already have a big pump that has been ported. They (They in this instance being the guy that built my heads) port them so they flow more at lower RPM but have a bypass spring that I believe is ~70psi. I have seen 70psi of oil pressure up top in the past, before I knew I had this leak. I have a 25 row oil cooler that takes up all the space in the driver side guard. It is interesting that GM themselves recommend 0-30 oil for their Vette applications. Unless you take it to the track where the official word is to put 20-50w oil in there, then take that back out after your track day is done and return to 0-30.
    • Nice, looks great. Nice work getting the factory parts also. Never know when you'll need them.
×
×
  • Create New...