Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I am about to change the spark plugs in my Stagea (R33 RB25DET equivalent) and want to know what spark plugs people use in their R33s and why.

The biggest issue I see across the other threads is people re-gapping or buying spark plugs gapped at 0.8mm rather then the specified 1.1mm

I am going to stick with NGK plugs for my car but am wondering why people actually use the 0.8mm gap over the 1.1mm gap when it comes to the spark plugs. There seems to be many people on here that are advising this and I want to know the exact reasons why as Im certain the standard coil over plug can easy give good enough spark on the 1.1mm gap and am concerned with hesisation under accelaration using the smaller gap as you can see in other cars.

By the way the plugs Im talking in reference to are the Iridium NGK plugs BKR5EIX-11 (1.1mm gap) and the BKR5EIX (08.mm gap). But the gap issue shouldn't matter if copper or iridum I would imagine.

By the way Im running just an average setup of filter, 10psi and cat back exhaust but have plans for full exhaust and frount mount soon.

I use NGK copper BCPR6ES which are pre gapped to .8mm. I changed to gapped spark plugs to overcome the missing problem i was encountering after raising the boost from stock to 1 bar. The gapped plugs solved this problem. They are nice and cheap at $4ea so if they stuff up you can just go chuck a whole new set in for $24.

u probably know but the gap referrs to the "gap" that the spark has to travel to the tip. so shorter distance = quicker sparks = quicker combustions in the high revs. then there are others who say that 1.1 give a stronger spark = better combustions. well this is what ive picked up readin the various threads. im currently runnin NGK BCPR6ES (0.8) too after havin misfire on my old sparkies which died in the ass. im running stock boost and there doesnt seem to be any hesitations.

I am running kinda the same setup as you. I have a r33 RB25det running 10psi but with a turbo back exhaust. I started having issues with the car missing when the boost went over 8psi , I was told that with the increase boost it can cause the spark to be blown out when the air rushes it. Thus the smaller gap makes it harder to blow out. Im not sure why the missing started cause i was running the same setup before the only thing i can guess at is that the coil packs were getting older and thus providing less spark?

Anyway I put some BKR5EIX-11's (1.1mm gap) in my car but the engine still missed when i hit 8+ psi. Then i re gapped my standard plugs to 0.8mm and the problem went away. I now have BKR5EIX's (08.mm gap) on order, they should be going in the car tomorrow. I will let you know if they make much of a difference over the standard plugs at 0.8mm.

I have actuallly tested the difference in plug gaps.........i bought 2 sets of plugs......both the same heat rating (7)...one set were gapped at 1.1 and the other at 0.9........at 0.9 they actually made the engine more responsive and felt more powerful.

Just my personal experience........others may feel differently

OK, so I put a set of NGK BCPR6ES into my RB25DET yesterday. The plugs that were in there before were NGK PFR5G11. I fired the car up and immediately noticed a different tone coming from the engine. Warmed her up then took her for a lap around the block.

The car seems to JERK continuously under acceleration now. When not accelerating everything is fine. The car now sounds like a mild V8. Does anyone know what the problem could be?

Mods are 3' Turbo back exhaust, FMIC, 10psi boost & pod filter.

there have been threads about how peeps get the odd dud sparkies. i remember a thread where someone put 6 new ones in and they were all duds. might be good to take them out again and have a look. sound of a V8 and the jerkin suggests one or more of your sparkies aint workin right.

there have been threads about how peeps get the odd dud sparkies.  i remember a thread where someone put 6 new ones in and they were all duds.  might be good to take them out again and have a look.  sound of a V8 and the jerkin suggests one or more of your sparkies aint workin right.

Cheers mate, I'll pull em out and stick the old ones back in to see what happens! How do I test whether the new ones r duds?

Dont know if Spark plugs can change the way the car drives, but it might have had an affect on something else, like ignition timing for example. Dont now why it would though.

I had this exact same problem when i did my spark plugs. Sounded almost like a wrx on idle but chugged when ever i tried to accelerate. The cause was the coil packs. When pluggin one of the coil packs in the ground wire got bent back and wasn't contacting.

Pull out each coil pack one at a time and check all the connections are ok. Hope this helps.

Upon opening up the cover I found that one of the connections from the loom to a coil pack had come undone.

Put it back together now problem fixed. Thanks guys for the suggestions. Lesson learned: Don't change spark plugs in failing light!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...