Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys, this looks like an opportune time for a bit of SAFC, ITC and ECU information dumping......

An SAFC modifies the signal from the AFM to fool the ECU into thinking there is less airflow (this leans out the mixture) or more airflow (this richens the mixture).

An SAFC does nothing for correcting the ignition timing, in fact I have seen cases where it actually does the wrong thing. An example, if you have somewhere in your RPM range where the mixtures are too rich. The SAFC can be adjusted to have the ECU lean this out by telling the ECU that there is less airflow, so it reduces the amount of fuel. The A/F ratios are now good, but what happens to the ignition timing? Well the ECU thinks there is less airflow (than there really is) so it advances the ignition timing to what the ignition map says is correct for that (lower) amount of load.

In my experience that's too far advanced quite often, so I have 2 choices. Either, retard the static ignition timing, which affects all rpm ranges. Even though it might be OK at some RPM's and even (already) too retarded at others. Or, compromise on the A/F ratios and balance it out so I get close to what ratio I want, but don't affect the ignition timing too much.

Now to fix this ignition timing problem you can get an ITC. This sits between the CAS and the ECU and modifies the ECU's firing of the spark plugs. But again this is a compromise as the ITC only has a small number of correction points and it extrapolates in a straight line between them. This is particularly a problem at times (in the RPM range) of rapidly changing boost levels.

As you increase the amount of power and/or boost this "compromising" just gets worse. With an SAFC and an ITC you have (sort of) fixed the A/F ratios and the ignition timing, but you also have the problems of boost mapping, idle stability, load correction for air con, power steering, electrical load, rpm limiter, speed limiter, cold start and run etc etc

If you add up the costs of all the "trickers" it works out more than a Power FC and still doesn't give anywhere near the quality of result. So for a modest power target, an SAFC is not a bad thing, but if you are serious, then an ECU upgrade is the go.

Hope that helps

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/6309-safc/page/2/#findComment-745385
Share on other sites

Thanks for that reply Sydneykid, my car is also auto and i have a s-afc. But when being tuned on the dyno the tuners had problems with the timing as it caused the car to misfire when they leaned out the s-afc. So if i get my hands on a ITC it will fix my problems? I wish i could get a power fc but im stuck with this problem.

Or would you recommend me to sell the s-afc and buy a e-manage with igniton harness? The only info i havent been able to find out is if the ignition harness will work on the auto with no problems. I dont want to throw any more money around trying to solve it, i just want the cheapest, easiest option which the ITC sounds like it can do.

Cheers,

Matt

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/6309-safc/page/2/#findComment-745392
Share on other sites

Hi Strutto, if your power targets are modest, then an SAFC is the go. We are getting an auto Stagea shortly and I will stick an SAFC in that. I have a ball bearing hi flow RB25 turbo to go on it, a split dump, 3" exhaust, panel filter, CAI, Autospeed (Norgren valve based) boost controller and an OK intercooler. Should give a nice torquey 200 rwkw to tow the race cars with.

If it doesn't end up meeting my expectations, I might try a piggy back manual Power FC. Leave the inputs to the standard ECU and the outputs from it to the auto. Parrallel up the inputs to the PFC and use it to run ignition, fuel, boost and idle control. I have seen an R33 with a Link piggy backed similarly, it was OK but a little rough on the gearchanges.

Have a chat to Steve-SST, I think he has done a Wolf into an auto.

Hope that helps

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/6309-safc/page/2/#findComment-745401
Share on other sites

Well once i get the ecu issuses sorted out i plan on doing the fuel pump, fuel pressure regulator, cam gear and then finally highflow the T3. I think that will be enough power for me so is a safc and itc good enough for this setup? Thanks again, Matt

Yep, sure it's a compromise, but not that bad. I had a friend with an SAFC and ITC and he was happy for 3 years, driving everyday + some drag and circuit work.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/6309-safc/page/2/#findComment-745413
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Ok i will get those 310mm. I found one but on a different site. This is the description on those...is it ok? Technical parameters: - Axle: front. - Disc type: ventilated. - Number of holes: 5. - Disc diameter: 310mm. - Total height with center: 54mm. - Thickness (new/min.): 30/28mm. - Designed for brake calipers manufacturer: Sumitomo.
    • You Gregged a whole racetrack!?
    • Look for broken wire or bad connector at the motor. Might not be it, but is worth starting there, as it is easy.
    • Hi everyone, I’m having an issue with my R32 GT-R. Sometimes, when the car goes over a bump or experiences some vibration, the 4WD warning light comes on the dashboard. When I check the code from the control unit in the trunk, it shows Code 19 – ETS Motor. However, everything seems to be working fine — if I turn off the engine and restart the car, the light goes away and everything functions normally. Has anyone experienced this before? Where should I start troubleshooting this issue? Thanks in advance!
    • I'm back from the dyno - again! I went looking for someone who knew LS's and had a roller dyno, to see how it shaped up compared to everything else and confirm the powerband really is peaking where Mr Mamo says it should. TLDR: The dyno result I got this time definitely had the shape of how it feels on the road and finally 'makes sense'. Also we had a bit more time to play with timing on the dyno, it turns out the common practice in LS is to lower the timing around peak torque and restore it to max after. So given a car was on the dyno and mostly dialled in already, it was time for tweaking. Luis at APS is definitely knowledgable when it came to this and had overlays ready to go and was happy to share. If you map out your cylinder airmass you start seeing graphs that look a LOT like the engine's torque curve. The good thing also is if you map out your timing curve when you're avoiding knock... this curve very much looks like the inverse of the airmass curve. The result? Well it's another 10.7kw/14hp kw from where I drove it in at. Pretty much everywhere, too. As to how much this car actually makes in Hub Dyno numbers, American Dyno numbers, or Mainline dyno numbers, I say I don't know and it's gone up ~25kw since I started tinkering lol. It IS interesting how the shorter ratio gears I have aren't scaled right on this dyno - 6840RPM is 199KMH, not 175KMH. I have also seen other printouts here with cars with less mods at much higher "kmh" for their RPM due Commodores having 3.45's or longer (!) rear diff ratios maxing out 4th gear which is the 1:1 gear on the T56. Does this matter? No, not really. The real answer is go to the strip and see what it traps, but: I guess I should have gone last Sunday...
×
×
  • Create New...