Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Is it worth modifying the rb25de head or should I be looking for an rb26 one?

At present I'm looking at a port n polish, reground cams etc which will see a 15% flow increase. If i go the whole hog ( and almost double the cost) and get oversized valves etc it could be upto 35% increase, but is it worth spending that sort of cash on a RB25de head?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/64638-headwork-for-rb25-rb30-hybrid/
Share on other sites

you dont need to touch the buckets, to get back the lifter preload you loose buy reducing the base circle size on re-ground cams you need to increase the stem height of the valve, buy either welding the valve tip, using a lash cap, or if your doin a valve grind at the same time cut the seats deeper, wouldnt go deeper than about 20 thou. though

Thanks for the input so far guys, just thought I should point out I wont be doing the work myself so talk about buckets etc goes over my head.

Haven't looked into cams to much, was gonna go with Tomie, but was told not to bother with Jap stuff as they can be made locally for a lot less.

More interested in wether or not to spend the cash on the rb25 head or start looking for a gtr one. Final target for car is 800hp.

Thanks for the input so far guys, just thought I should point out I wont be doing the work myself so talk about buckets etc goes over my head.

Haven't looked into cams to much, was gonna go with Tomie, but was told not to bother with Jap stuff as they can be made locally for a lot less.

More interested in wether or not to spend the cash on the rb25 head or start looking for a gtr one. Final target for car is 800hp.

Go the RB26 top end, it WILL work out cheaper in the long run.:)

So what are the options for cams for the rb25de head?

Can u buy off the shelf items like 260 degree, 9.5mm lift cams for the head.....?

Or would you have to convert to solid lifters (how much for the kit?) and use cams designed for another head altogether.....?

non vvt of course in my case....

It really depends on your final target.

My goal is ~300rwkw with 340-350rwkw for the odd run.

The RB25 head with a set of cams will do nicely.

At the time of purchase my Rb25 head was $750.

For the GTR head I was quoted over $2000, and thats if I could find one.

Now the GTR heads are cheaper and more common than they were 2-2.5years ago. :/

As I didn't buy the GTR head I was able to save that $1250 and put it towards getting the RB25 head rebuilt, ported/polished & inlet valves deshrouded.

I always knew I wasn't after huge cams as I want to keep respectable fuel economy. For myself the RB25 head suited my needs.

The RB26 head will make a little more mid range due to the use of higher lift cams.

I had to draw the line some where. :P

A GTR head not rebuild and stock with a set of aftermarket cams would have cost the same as my RB25 head rebuilt & worked slightly fitted with a set of aftermarket cams 260duration with say a 8.5mm lift.

I like things new, hence I wanted it rebuilt.

If I were to rebuild the GTR head and do a little bit of work to it sure it would flow slightly better than the rb25 head BUT it would have also cost me more.

Some thing a full time Uni student that works during the holidays doesn't really have much of when the build is already going to cost at least $12,000 in total.

DCIEVE, You sound like you are in another boat BUT remember one has to be realistic about their HP goals, 800hp is a LOT of hp and requires a LOT of money. ;)

You wouldn't want to be skimping on a set of what sounds like dodgy aussy reground cams for this build.

Add it all up........

RB26 used "brand name" cams are much cheaper and easier to get than RB25 used cams

RB26 already has solid lifters

RB26 already has a good plenum and throttle bodies (Theo does 9's with them)

RB26 has better valves, standard

RB26 "brand name" exhaust manifolds are easier and cheaper to buy used

RB26 has 12 mm head bolts standard

RB26 doesn't have VVT, so no mucking around blocking it off or adding external feeds if you want it to work like an RB25

RB26 has superior water jacket around the exhaust ports, whic his important for high power applications

I could go on, but I think you get the drift......

If you add up the cost of the above, you will find even paying $2K more for an RB26 head is still cheaper. I bought a complete RB26 with a blown head gasket for $3K, sold the bottom end for $1500, sold the RB25 head for $600, sold the turbos for $400, used the std cams in an RB20 $300. So the RB26 head cost $200. It took me 3 months to find what I wanted so shop around, it's out there, have your money ready and move quickly the good ones go fast:cheers:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I drive the Tiguan much harder than the Skyline in all conditions, because it just grips and hooks, unlike the R33 shit box
    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
×
×
  • Create New...