Jump to content
SAU Community

  

281 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 118
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

hehe... time for the good old smackdown... never get tired of using this gif :D

v35_not_r35.gif

:D R36 :D R35 :rofl: based on R34 design... gold!

its almost as good as hearing every single ex-honda owning US drift/togeh bandwagon jumpin ricer buying a 240sx and recommending all his forum buddies to put RB engines into their cars coz its "JDM TYTE Y0".

ok so i retract my previous statement i thought the information i had was correct so if your right

what is the picture that i posted of?

and where do i buy r33 gt-r parts in the us does anyone know?

oh and by the way i am a "yank" and do you guys really call us that?

why who r u? do u work for nissan or something id hope so big call to say "tell this guy who i am" haha u sound like a god

^^^ lol... well now you know who I am :rolleyes:

Hi, I think those skyline coupes look good, I mean every car has its supporters. I dont like R33's, the only exception being the GTR with its pumped guards. The v35's do look a bit like the 350Z but that isnt such a bad thing.

I cant really see R35/36 GTR breaking GTR tradition, from a looks point of view most of the base model Skylines look ok (except for a couple) and the GTR has always been the one with a more agressive and purposeful look.

Stephen

p.s. For a Z / Skyline looks comparison; check the nissan site out.

http://www.nissan.co.jp/EN/lineup.html

go down to the bottom and select 'Fairlady Z' and then Skyline and see how similar they are, they nearly line up perfectly!!!

  • 1 month later...

so i have a few questions you say the next skyline is going to be a v35 or something along those lines not an r35 but the newest issue of sport compact car says that nissan is building to the release of the new r35 gt-r with the release of the 05 nismo Z-tune r34 (which oddly enough is the most ridiculous car ever).

so what is really going on are they going to stick with the cars they have released for you guys over here or are they actually going to produce a new gt-r (infinit or non)?

so i have a few questions you say the next skyline is going to be a v35 or something along those lines not an r35 but the newest issue of sport compact car says that nissan is building to the release of the new r35 gt-r with the release of the 05 nismo Z-tune r34 (which oddly enough is the most ridiculous car ever).

so what is really going on are they going to stick with the cars they have released for you guys over here or are they actually going to produce a new gt-r (infinit or non)?

Sport Compact Car? Hmmmmm... those guys *literally* have as much chance as I do of getting info about the next GT-R (and I know they make big bucks). They just named it R35 GT-R in their article because they're just following what 10,000,000,000 newbies on the 'net have been calling it since 2001.

Put it this way: SCC are in it to make money... they make money by selling magazines... they sell magazines by printing articles that people want to read... they print articles with next to no *real* content for that reason only, selling mags. So I'm not suprised they called it R35, as they could've called it ZZR TUNE 000-7 Type T super Turbo Ricemobile and still sold mags...

  • 1 month later...

"Originally Posted by zer0for0je

R34 is the mark of the end of a great car era..."

Ha! that's what some R32 owners say too about the R32.

Can't live in the past all your lives guys.

Tastes change thing move on.

Go the V35 :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...