Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Guys;

Does anyone know if this is possible? It makes me a bit nervous that the PFC won't retard ign via the factory knock sensor, seems the best way to protect the engine so not sure why they don't have this feature. Don't hear of many stock engines detting themselves to death. I know that the dash light flashes when there is det but I'd rather the ECU do it's thing instantaneously. I understand the D-jetro does this so they must have the tech to do it.

Cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/65311-retaining-knock-sensor-with-pfc/
Share on other sites

I get asked this a lot, my usual response is, what is it that you want to protect the engine from?

For example, if it is excessive boost causing the knock (eg; stuck wastegate or dud boost controller), then you protect the engine via the boost correction table. When the boost exceeds your programmed levels, throw some fuel in there.

If it is excessive water temperature (eg; hot day, busted radiator hose), then you protect the engine via the temp correction table. When the temp exceeds your programmed levels, retard the ignition.

If it is excessive air temperature (eg; hot day, busted intercooler), then you protect the engine via the temp correction table. When the temp exceeds your programmed levels, retard the ignition. If you have a Datalogit and a PFC Boost Control Kit you can also reduce the boost levels in three steps of inlet temps. Even go zero boost if you want.

There are other correction tables for battery voltage (dud alternator), ignition dwell (dud ignitor) that also retard the timing. You can also adjust the dash light flash for injector warning, knock warning and air flow warning.

That's a hell of a lot of programable protection without resorting to the simplistic limp home style that you find in standard ECU's. Plus it makes finding the problem (the one causing the excessive knock) a whole heap easier.

Hope that helps:cheers:

Thanks SK;

1. Trying to protect it from detonation....I like the factory system because it's a failsafe, no risk. And that means not incurring RB26 DEBT.

2. While you can prog for some eventualities you can't prog for all. How about bad fuel or a combination of some events you have described, not just the event eg air temp, or water temp in isolation. A combination of big enough (but below programmed threshholds) events might bring about the right circumstances for detonation. Dud injector maybe?Unlikely perhaps but I'm not gambling with a 12k rebuild.

3. I have to rely on someone else to tune it for me. And, as you know, it's all in the tuning. I don't have the expertise to know what to tell the tuner re thresholds, and I have no way of knowing if what they have done is going to protect the engine.

4. I'd rather spend $ and time finding the problem that $$$$ and time rebuilding an engine ie see point 1.

I once put the question of knock detector absence to a well respected tuner in Sydney. His response was 'just don't go mad on a hot day'. Please! I'm not going to risk my engine on that basis. I want something that will allow me to flatten the thing under any circumstances irrespective of weather. That may not make him well respected in your eyes but then I doubt he has your experience, unfortunately he's about the best most of us can get access to and I suspect he's conservative.

And I still don't know why it's not a standard feature.

Regards

Hi omg;

that would be v interesting. I look forward to seeing something about it.

Thanks SK;

1. Trying to protect it from detonation....I like the factory system because it's a failsafe, no risk. And that means not incurring RB26 DEBT.  

2. While you can prog for some eventualities you can't prog for all. How about bad fuel or a combination of some events you have described, not just the event eg air temp, or water temp in isolation.  A combination of big enough (but below programmed threshholds) events might bring about the right circumstances for detonation. Dud injector maybe?Unlikely perhaps but I'm not gambling with a 12k rebuild.  

3. I have to rely on someone else to tune it for me. And, as you know, it's all in the tuning. I don't have the expertise to know what to tell the tuner re thresholds, and I have no way of knowing if what they have done is going to protect the engine.  

4. I'd rather spend $ and time finding the problem that $$$$ and time rebuilding an engine ie see point 1.    

I once put the question of knock detector absence to a well respected tuner in Sydney. His response was 'just don't go mad on a hot day'. Please! I'm not going to risk my engine on that basis. I want something that will allow me to flatten the thing under any circumstances irrespective of weather. That may not make him well respected in your eyes but then I doubt he has your experience, unfortunately he's about the best most of us can get access to and I suspect  he's conservative.  

And I still don't know why it's not a standard feature.  

Regards.

The reason why it is not standard is Apexi don't think it needs it. They believe (and I agree) that there are enough maps/correction tables to cover the circumstances, let me try and look at your examples;

Water temp, I have my water temp correction starting at 5 degrees above normal running. Anything less than that would have no effect on knock levels, so you gain no extra protection from having knock retard.

Air temp, the inlet air temp correction table has multiple points, so you can start protection at any temp you like, as little as 2 degrees if you want. That is way less than would have any effect on knock, so you gain no extra protection from knock retard.

Even if I add the two together (say 4 degrees water temp and 2 degree inlet temp) the knock would not increase enough to trip the knock protection. Plus it is worth mentioning that the standard ECU will only retard the ignition, the PFC will add fuel AND retard the ignition. So I could easily argue I have SUPERIOR protection for my engine.

Knock retard won't do much for you with a single dud injector, there are plenty of standard ECU RB20/25/26's around with holes in pistons and the knock protection didn't help them. Fuel bad enough to trip the standard ECU knock protection is so bloody obvious from the driver seat, you would stop driving long before the standard ecu did anything. Plus the dash warning light is going to warn you and you can see what is going on via the Commander.

As for tuning, well you are always in the hands of your tuner. If he stuffs up or tunes it too hard (zero safety margin) then knock protection isn't going to save you. I srongly suggest you establish a relationship with your tuner and discuss what it is that you expect/want from your engine. None of what I have posted here should be foreign to any decent engine tuner. If you talk to your tuner and he doesn't display sufficient knowledge and/or understanding in response to your questions, then I respectfully suggest you find another tuner. I think I have given you enough ammunition to ask sensible question and audition your tuner, if not please feel free to send me a PM and ask any question you want. I will do my best to answer them.

The bottom line is, there are plenty of people around who will confirm that the standard ecu (with knock protection) is not going to help you in most circumstances on a highly tuned/worked engine. It works OK on a stock standard one. But Apexi have designed a better system for your purposes, because it is designed for modified/tuned engines.

I can assure that I feel far safer driving my RB31DET with a Power FC looking after it, than the RB25DET with a standard ECU.

My 20 cents worth:cheers:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I had 3 counts over the last couple of weeks once where i got stranded at a jdm paint yard booking in some work. 2nd time was moving the car into the drive way for the inspection and the 3rd was during the inspection for the co2 leak test. Fix: 1st, car off for a hour and half disconnected battery 10mins 4th try car started 2nd, 5th try started 3rd, countless time starting disconnected battery dude was under the hood listening to the starting sequence fuel pump ect.   
    • This. As for your options - I suggest remote mounting the Nissan sensor further away on a length of steel tube. That tube to have a loop in it to handle vibration, etc etc. You will need to either put a tee and a bleed fitting near the sensor, or crack the fitting at the sensor to bleed it full of oil when you first set it up, otherwise you won't get the line filled. But this is a small problem. Just needs enough access to get it done.
    • The time is always correct. Only the date is wrong. It currently thinks it is January 19. Tomorrow it will say it is January 20. The date and time are ( should be ! ) retrieved from the GPS navigation system.
    • Buy yourself a set of easy outs. See if they will get a good bite in and unthread it.   Very very lucky the whole sender didn't let go while on the track and cost you a motor!
    • Well GTSBoy, prepare yourself further. I did a track day with 1/2 a day prep on Friday, inpromptu. The good news is that I got home, and didn't drive the car into a wall. Everything seemed mostly okay. The car was even a little faster than it was last time. I also got to get some good datalog data too. I also noticed a tiny bit of knock which was (luckily?) recorded. All I know is the knock sensors got recalibrated.... and are notorious for false knock. So I don't know if they are too sensitive, not sensitive enough... or some other third option. But I reduced timing anyway. It wasn't every pull through the session either. Think along the lines of -1 degree of timing for say, three instances while at the top of 4th in a 20 minute all-hot-lap session. Unfortunately at the end of session 2... I noticed a little oil. I borrowed some jack stands and a jack and took a look under there, but as is often the case, messing around with it kinda half cleaned it up, it was not conclusive where it was coming from. I decided to give it another go and see how it was. The amount of oil was maybe one/two small drops. I did another 20 minute session and car went well, and I was just starting to get into it and not be terrified of driving on track. I pulled over and checked in the pits and saw this: This is where I called it, packed up and went home as I live ~20 min from the track with a VERY VERY CLOSE EYE on Oil Pressure on the way home. The volume wasn't much but you never know. I checked it today when I had my own space/tools/time to find out what was going on, wanted to clean it up, run the car and see if any of the fittings from around the oil filter were causing it. I have like.. 5 fittings there, so I suspected one was (hopefully?) the culprit. It became immediately apparent as soon as I looked around more closely. 795d266d-a034-4b8c-89c9-d83860f5d00a.mp4       This is the R34 GTT oil sender connected via an adapter to an oil cooler block I have installed which runs AN lines to my cooler (and back). There's also an oil temp sensor on top.  Just after that video, I attempted to unthread the sensor to see if it's loose/worn and it disintegrated in my hand. So yes. I am glad I noticed that oil because it would appear that complete and utter catastrophic engine failure was about 1 second of engine runtime away. I did try to drill the fitting out, and only succeeded in drilling the middle hole much larger and now there's a... smooth hole in there with what looks like a damn sleeve still incredibly tight in there. Not really sure how to proceed from here. My options: 1) Find someone who can remove the stuck fitting, and use a steel adapter so it won't fatigue? (Female BSPT for the R34 sender to 1/8NPT male - HARD to find). IF it isn't possible to remove - Buy a new block ($320) and have someone tap a new 1/8NPT in the top of it ($????) and hope the steel adapter works better. 2) Buy a new block and give up on the OEM pressure sender for the dash entirely, and use the supplied 1/8 NPT for the oil temp sender. Having the oil pressure read 0 in the dash with the warning lamp will give me a lot of anxiety driving around. I do have the actual GM sensor/sender working, but it needs OBD2 as a gauge. If I'm datalogging I don't actually have a readout of what the gauge is currently displaying. 3) Other? Find a new location for the OEM sender? Though I don't know of anywhere that will work. I also don't know if a steel adapter is actually functionally smart here. It's clearly leveraged itself through vibration of the motor and snapped in half. This doesn't seem like a setup a smart person would replicate given the weight of the OEM sender. Still pretty happy being lucky for once and seeing this at the absolute last moment before bye bye motor in a big way, even if an adapter is apparently 6 weeks+ delivery and I have no way to free the current stuck/potentially destroyed threads in the current oil block.
×
×
  • Create New...