Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I really feel for you r32gts as you know myself and a few othrer forum members were the victoms of GDTNO the scamming little bastardo.

Like we did you should talk to his parants about the whole thing and see if they can pay you back.

Prank needs a ip address identifyer for his server so that anyone who registers for sau,and are on a banned list are instanly found oout..

If only there was such a thing.Still there are other ways of getting on here.Like a new computer with a new ip address,friends computer etc.

  • Replies 72
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I really feel for you r32gts as you know myself and a few othrer forum members were the victoms of GDTNO the scamming little bastardo.

Like we did you should talk to his parants about the whole thing and see if they can pay you back.

Prank needs a ip address identifyer for his server so that anyone who registers for sau,and are on a banned list are instanly found oout..

If only there was such a thing.Still there are other ways of getting on here.Like a new computer with a new ip address,friends computer etc.

Fatgtsr has a point.

hope so.

he's just making it easier for everyone :)

By giving us more detail to put into the bad traders list so no-one with SAU has to deal with him again

He could have just provided false information, so that next time he signs up to rip people off, the details don't match.

hope so.

he's just making it easier for everyone :)

By giving us more detail to put into the bad traders list so no-one with SAU has to deal with him again

He could have just provided false information, so that next time he signs up to rip people off, the details don't match with what's in the bad trader warning.

hope so.

he's just making it easier for everyone :)

By giving us more detail to put into the bad traders list so no-one with SAU has to deal with him again

He could have just provided false information, so that next time he signs up to rip people off, the details don't match with what's in the bad trader warning.

hope so.

he's just making it easier for everyone :)

By giving us more detail to put into the bad traders list so no-one with SAU has to deal with him again

He could have just provided false information, so that next time he signs up to rip people off, the details don't match with what's in the bad trader warning.

FATGTS-R,

I recently bought an AP PowerFC via COD.

Prior to purchase I spoke to the Post office box people who allowed me to inspect the item before paying.

After all 1k+ is a lot of money to be throwing around when you really don't know if it is indeed the correct item.

Hey there Alex...aka " doridori32" and other crap.

its Roger here aka " nismo33"...purchased the fuel pump from you not long ago...had no idea you sent me the wrong pump...so now i would like a refund.

you can have your fuel pump back and otherwise i will give your info to the police and file a report againts you.

that was a rip off mate...wasn't impress.

i just want my money back..you can have your fuel pump as that wasn't the fuel pump i paid for.

personally....i wouldn't mind dropping around to alex's joint and beating $200 worth of sard fuel regulator out of him....we'll say $1 each punch?

Seriously guys, insist of COD when purchasing. Its dead simple - just get the guy to go to the post office, and with the COD, this can be paid by the sender, or the recipient. Its not expensive either - $15-20?? very little money but piece of mind in knowing that you wont get jibbed. The post office is reasonable too - allowing you to open the package first to make sure the part you requested is in there.

maybe you could post him back a C4 mailbomb as a personal thanks for the rip off.

better yet - why doesn't everyone repost their junk mail and any other shit to alex's joint? perhaps even print outs of the forum thread in hope that his dad reads it and breaks his fkn neck for us?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Block bump. $400. As above cyl 6 needs bore or sleeve.
    • I would think making the argument that the travel is limited by a spring flexing against a spring perch as "the same method". Later on in the document they do state that the spring can't bind on full bump travel and cannot come loose in full rebound travel as well. (which is all very sensible). The laws are actually pretty sensible and reasonable. It's just that the people who enforce and check them don't actually read them or know them accurately. "Oh, coilovers? Instant fail mate. Don't even need to look at it." - Guy who will be instantly reported by me. There is probably merit to people who do get defected for height also get defected for the suspension in that state that allows it. I did never consider the people who are complaining about coilovers being picked on are also running around at 50mm off the floor.
    • I think given SAU's knowledge of E85 we can strongly conclude that 10% ethanol in almost any situation is entirely fine. Almost all of the myths against E85 were overblown, let alone E10.
    • From your link See bold text, is this referring to damper settings, if so that may a issue for "some" inspectors, I cannot see aftermarket coilovers having the evidence that "must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original" Maybe just remove the adjustment knows and hope for the best???? Meh 5.2 Suspension travel In all instances, modifications to a vehicle’s suspension must ensure the integrity of the system and not compromise the ride quality. At least two thirds of the original suspension travel should be maintained in both directions (rebound (i.e. extension) and bump (i.e. compression)), and rebound must be limited by the same method used by the vehicle manufacturer or if this is not practicable due to the nature of the modification, an equivalent method. If an alternative method is used, evidence must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original.
    • They actually don't - They adhere to VSB14 rules just like Victoria. The rules are against CABIN adjustable height, and it quite clearly states that the height has to be within parameters. I asked the VASS engineer to confirm this when I got my car engineered and they refused to engineer the coilovers because they didn't meet the requirements for requiring engineering. (mine are height adjustable.) People "Not wanting to bother" with "Actually reading/knowing/adhering to the rules" should result in fines and immediately losing the ability to issue blue slips and/or RWC's in Vic.
×
×
  • Create New...