Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

gidday, i have a rb20det with a few mods and i want to know how much further i can turn the boost up before either the air flow cut, or injectors max out.

My mods,

silver top rb20det

t3/to4e turbo, 49mm turbine, 51mm compressor (73mm outside)

3" mandrel all the way through

400 by 600 by 70mm custom intercooler

pod filter

0.8mm gapped plugs

stock ecu

The ecu has vs data rom on it. i assume this is some japanese tuner, I have had to turn the timing down to around 12 degrees before top dead at idle to make it not ping on boost. ( this maybe cos the chip was for good fuel?, i run 96)

any ideas to get a bit more out of the car?

It currently runs about 11psi.

cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/69514-how-much-is-too-much/
Share on other sites

Asking is probally like asking how long a piece of string is.

Best way is to measure the AFM output voltage and measure the injectory duty cycle, under full boost and look for the peak readings for both measurements.

With a turbo like that, my estimate is it won't be able to run much more boost than what you are already.

Take it out on a cold winters night and see if you can get it to cut. The air is more dense and it will more likely cut during these conditions than a hot day.

Cheers.

what is max voltage out of the standard air flow meter? is it 5.12v?

what about injector duty cycle? how many milliseconds?

I have made up the interface and i use conzult (the free version, for 300zx) to monitor these values. Anyone know of any other good free software that will data log so i can look through a run instead of nearly crashing as i try to look at data real time. ha ha

They are rated between 0-5V (But in reality they cut around the 5.12 mark)

The injector duty cycle should be measured with a multimeter that has "Duty Cycle" function, or other tool. (Measured 0-99% "on time")

Yes a fuel cut defender will just hold the maximum value in order not to cut it altogether, but of course, if it takes more air than the amount the AFM measures it will lean out real quickk.

Fuel Cut Defenders are so dodgy i don't know why they make them. DODGE!

cheers rb-30 power.

I have always wanted to know, is the air flow meter value a value of the volume of air coming in per time (eg second) or the amount of air coming in per cycle of the motor?

Because if you have load (afm) versus rpm maps, then doesn't that mean you have load per cycle of the engine. eg the afm signal may say 2volts at 3000rpm at -2psi pressure and then 4volts at 3000rpm at +7psi boost and still say 4volts at 7psi at 6000rpm? am i correct?

Its output corresponds to the volume of air going through the meter at that particular time.

Maximum air flow (maximum afm voltage) usually occurs at maximum boost pressure and at the point where the VE (volumetric efficiency-where the motor consumes most air.) of the motor is the greatest. This is usually where peak torque is delivered. Bigger cams change the point where maximum VE can occur, bigger cams will move this point up the rev range, naturally.

Back to what you were saying its output is the volume of air going through the meter at that particular second.

Im not to sure how quick the AFM can actually sample and change its output, it would be almost instantly, lag would be in ms, i would be guessing. It would have to have some lag, for the change in the hot wire temp to change.

But yeah, AFM are the most accurate way of measuring actual air going into the motor. Maps sensors just don't compare.

ok, so it is counting volume per cycle of the motor then. i would be interested in how exactly it does this, how the thing counts air?

I am correct in saying most guys with rb20dets with stock ecu and injectors hit the fuel cut ( afm max) before the injectors run out? does this a safe way to find the limit of my set up would be to slowly turn the boost up until i hit the fuel cut, then turn it back slightly?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The fab work can be as simple as a couple of silicon hoses and clamps to the factory piping. 
    • Just sounds like either way you need to do some fab work to get everything to fit, so why limit yourself at that point? If the GCG high flow option is zero effort in and out swap though I'd probably do that. It's almost certainly lowest risk, lowest cost, etc. The HKS GTIII-RS option that Kapr mentioned is laughably expensive for what it is, they charge the exact same for two turbos on the RB26 so their margins are off the charts on that thing.
    • Intake manifold is not a part of the issue. The turbo bolts to the exhaust manifold. That is easy. But close your eyes and picture the physical situation. That is a T3 flange on the manifold and a T3 flange on the turbo. As long as any new turbo has a T3 flange on the exhaust housing, that exhaust housing will bolt to the exhaust manifold. This places the exhaust housing in the same place as the stock one. But now move your mental attention a little further forward. The location of the compressor housing is set by the length of the turbo's core. The stock turbo had a long core. Let's say that it is..... 100mm long. So that would place the compressor housing 100mm forward of the exhaust housing. But a highflow, might well have a centre core that is shorter. Let's say that it is only 70mm long. Now the compressor housing will be 30mm further back in the engine bay than the stock one. This DOES move the turbo's compressor outlet backwards. It also moves the compressor's inlet backwards. You will very likely have to do some work to both the inlet and outlet piping to make everything connect again. I am not say this to make it out to be a bigger deal than it is. I am just pointing out that "bolt on" is sometimes not quite bolt on. The highflow from GCG that Murray linked above (https://gcg.com.au/turbo-charger-upgrade-skyline-gtst-2iu-xtrgts-s1.html ) uses a core that is the same length as the stock core, and so does not require this extra work. It will look very much like the stock turbo. No-one uses GTR turbos of any flavour (stock, or aftermarket) in a single turbo application on RB20/25. It's not a thing. Yes, people have been putting on GT3076, GTX3076 (and bigger and smaller versions of those) and G30s (of various sizes) onto RB20/25 since forever. But these are not "bolt on". Everything except the 4 bolts to the exhaust manifold change with these. And genuine Garretts are expensive. Non-gen, like Pulsar, etc, are cheaper, variously as good or nearly as good. But still not bolt on. No-one in the right mind would pay for an HKS turbo. Not in this modern day and age. Well, yes, the GCG highflow. You could ask HG what he can do to make the compressor housing sit in the original location. There are surely others doing highflows around the world. And some of the eBay/Temu ones (as reported by Dose) work and don't die. Bit of a lottery though. I would send your turbo to GCG (here in Oz) to be highflowed if you want a trivial no-extra-work option. But seriously, the work required to change inlet and outlet piping is not that hard. That's a boost control problem, not a turbo problem.
    • Thank you all for the replys 🙂 I know that intake would be different but that is one pipe at it is not that hard to get(custom one). I meant mainly bolt to the stock manifold and the turbo elbow. I looked and many sites/forums but they are just "old" with some old HKS turbos from GT-R i guess? What about some Garrets?  Or any other turbo? Is there even a turbo which i can just bolt on? 😄 And yeah i know about that new HKS but that is like 2000k USD without taxes/shipping in here   Iam getting a touch up tune but my "problem" is that on the "not" hot day iam getting peaks around 0,9 bar...and when it was around 15 Celsious i saw peak around 1 bar which is just too much for stock turbo. And of course turbo is old and i like to get some new one for a piece of mind 🙂 
    • I'm working on the assumption that our friend Jasmine here is a Russian (or, possibly Ukrainian) spammer/spambot, based purely on the number of such that I have been having to neuter in the last few weeks. IP address for the OP above was in WA. But that could have been via VPN. Posting at quarter to 4 in the morning is a good sign of being from somewhere in Europe. The last Jasmine that I kicked in the cooch was IP addressed in Ukraine. Even that could have been via VPN, and the bitchbot could have been from Russia, Serbia, China or anywhere. Regardless, was a spambot, so I killed it with fire. The fact that our new friend Jasmine here did not respond in any way to my tart query strongly suggests to me that this OP was just the establishment phase of a user able to be activated for spamming in a week, or 3 or 10.
×
×
  • Create New...