Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

is it legal to have different width tyres?

ie, ive got 255/40R17's on the back, and 235/45R17's on the front.

both fit under the wheel arches, etc... but it has been noted down on my work order something about different sized wheels?

cheers..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/71077-tyre-widths/
Share on other sites

If you look here you will find out :rofl:

http://www.dpi.wa.gov.au/licensing/myvehic...tions/tyre.html

Alternative road wheels are permitted under the following conditions :  

Rim width must not exceed the maximum rim width specified by the manufacturer by more than 25mm (1") (for passenger vehicles manufactured after 1st January 1973, the manufacturers rim width shall be taken as that specified on the tyre placard).  

In any event, rim width shall not exceed 177.8 mm (7") unless specified by the manufacturer as standard equipment for the vehicle in question. No increase in rim width is permitted for vehicles fitted with original equipment rims in excess of 177.8 mm (7") width.  

The wheel is contained completely within the body work of the vehicle which includes acceptable flares.  

The wheel does not foul any part of the body or suspension under all conditions of travel  

The vehicle handling is not impaired in any way.  

The tyre to rim fitment must be in accordance with the Tyre and Rim Association Manual.  

Rim diameters must be the same as specified by the manufacturer.  

The wheel must be one designed for use with the vehicle with respect to bolt pitch circle and wheel nut tapers  

The track must not be increased by more than 25mm (1") over the maximum specified by the manufacturer.etc.  

 

All wheels must be the same size, profile and bolt pattern.  

Vehicles required to comply with Australian Design Rule 24, "Tyre & Rim Selection" must continue to comply with this Design Rule (contact the Department of Transport and Regional Services for more details).  

The fitment of so called "plus one" and "plus two" and tyres is acceptable providing :  

the overall diameter of the large rims fitted with the lower profile tyres do not exceed the overall diameter  

all tyres and rims fitted to the vehicle are of the same size and profile  

with the exemption of item (f), the tyres and rims are in conformity with the requirements specified above in items (a) to (j).  

Reducing the wheel track less than the original manufacturers specification is not permitted, as this may reduce vehicle stability.  

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/71077-tyre-widths/#findComment-1310986
Share on other sites

Yeah! I actually rang licensing and spoke to the "Technical" guy there and he told me it was ok to have bigger on the rear compared to the front as long as the difference between them didn't exceed, I think, 10% or 20%. Might have been 20% :confused: and it had to state it on the placard that it supported those particular sizes. I have 8" on the front 235 and 9" on the rear 255.

So many different answers!! What's the actual fact??

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/71077-tyre-widths/#findComment-1312106
Share on other sites

seeing as i cant see which is legal or not, and different width tyres is on ym work order...

is anyone willing to loan me a set of same size/width rims/tyres early next week, or even just a par of 235/45R17's so i can match them to the fronts?

thats basically all i have left on my work order to complete before it expires on tuesday :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/71077-tyre-widths/#findComment-1324948
Share on other sites

Your wheels can only be 2 inches larger and 1 inch wider. If they are larger they are not legal

So when the r33 came out stock wheels where 16inch, largest you are legally allowed to get is 18. This also goes with the Width.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/71077-tyre-widths/#findComment-1326246
Share on other sites

yeah... ive got 17's on..

and the legalities of width is, you can have up to 7" rims on your car, unless it states larger on your tyre placard, then you may not exceed that,

so my tyre placard says 17" 255's on it, mine are that size...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/71077-tyre-widths/#findComment-1326257
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
    • @GTSBoy yeah sorry i know thery are known for colors bud those DBA are too in colors 🙂 Green will be good enough for me  
×
×
  • Create New...