Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

After reading the project book on the Jaycar boost controller, and having built the autospeed manual boost controller before, I like the way they put a valve in line with the wastegate to prevent it from seeing any boost until you determine. This lets you control not only the peak boost but also the rate of boost increase, so that the turbo can come on as hard as you want. This contrasts with standard where the valve is in parrallel with the wategate which is still seeing boost and hence starting to bleed (which slows the rate of boost increase) despite the fact you may be tricking it into seeing less that the actual boost.

If I understand correctly though, most other EBC's ( I am thinking of getting the boost control kit for the PFC) replace the factory solenoid with another, which acts to lower the boost seen by the wastegate, but not eliminate wastegate creep?

So............can I then change the plumbing of the EBC solenoid so that it is now in line with the wastegate, and change the programing, so that it doesnt open until I want to slow the rate of boost. I imagine that this means that programming it will be a little different, but it should result in a faster boosting setup ? :wassup:

Has anyone tried this, or is the logic a little off?

Cheers

Ned

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/71636-replumb-ebc-to-be-like-jaycar-style/
Share on other sites

Hi  all,

After reading the project book on the Jaycar boost controller, and having built the autospeed manual boost controller before, I like the way they put a valve in line with the wastegate to prevent it from seeing any boost until you determine. This lets you control not only the peak boost but also the rate of boost increase, so that the turbo can come on as hard as you want. This contrasts with standard where the valve is in parrallel with the wategate which is still seeing boost and hence starting to bleed (which slows the rate of boost increase) despite the fact you may be tricking it into seeing less that the actual boost.

If I understand correctly though, most other EBC's ( I am thinking of getting the boost control kit for the PFC) replace the factory solenoid with another, which acts to lower the boost seen by the wastegate, but not eliminate wastegate creep?

So............can I then change the plumbing of the EBC solenoid so that it is now in line with the wastegate, and change the programing, so that it doesnt open until I want to slow the rate of boost. I imagine that this means that programming it will be a little different, but it should result in a faster boosting setup ? :wassup:  

Has anyone tried this, or is the logic a little off?

Cheers

Ned

Hi Ned, my first suggestion would be to have a read of the Jaycar IEBC and DFA thread in the Stagea section.

The difference between the IEBC concept and the usual EBC, is that EBC's close the solenoid to decrease boost. This decreases the bypassed pressure and lets more airflow to the wastegate actuator. Whereas the IEBC opens the solenoid to decrease boost. This increases the airflow to the wastegate actuator.

The programmig logic in an EBC would therefore say;

decrease boost = close solenoid

The programmig logic in an IEBC would therefore say;

decrease boost = open solenoid

I don't think you could change the programming in an EBC so redically as to reverse its logic ompletely.

A solution, I have seen a Norgren valve inserted into the feed line to the solenoid such that the solenoid gets zero boost until a preset pressure. This is similar in concept to how the Autospeed 2 valve boost controller works. Consequently, even though the EBC might allow the solenoid to be open (prematurely), the valve stops any airflow and the wastegate stays closed.

Let me know if you need a more detailed explanation:cheers:

Hi SK,

Thanks for the prompt reply.

I logic you explained is exactely how I understood it to be, but not having played with an EBC or PFC I was unsure whether you program them on the basis of boost (via feedback from a sensor), or on duty cycle and then measure boost afterwards.

If I understand you, a conventional EBC doesnt let you control valve opening rather you control boost level which the software converts to solenoid opening duration?

Thanks

Ned

PS - I already have the valves form the Autospeed II setup, and currently have that plumbed into my standard setup, so could transfer that to the new one if that is the only way to control wastegate creep.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hey crew, Failed my WOF cause of a lower control arm, and I've decided to hit both arms, and also the compression rods at the same time(seems they're gonna be the most likely upcoming failure points from some discussions with the lads over on the G35 reddit). I've looking at these form Z1:  https://www.z1motorsports.com/front-suspension/hayaku-automotive/hayaku-g35-front-compression-rod-p-40716.html https://www.z1motorsports.com/front-suspension/hayaku-automotive/hayaku-g35-front-lower-control-arm-p-40674.html I asked Z1 if they'd work as it's the same platform, just RHD vs LHD. I basically got told "Lol dunno". Specifically they aren't aware of any difference but can't guarantee fitment as they haven't done it on a 350GT. So guess I'm asking is if there is any issues with using 2005 G35 coupe suspension parts on a 2005 350GT coupe? Orginally I thought it could be something in the way of the arms that each control arm is designed to be positioned around, but that'd be an engineering nightmare for Nissan needing two different shaped control arms 😅
    • ^ This. The mode door actuator is a common failure, as is the actuator and/or the actual valve for the coolant flow control valve. I also don't know how available the mode door actuator is these days. I've been meaning to look into it and get one from wherever is possible, to keep in the shed for the rainy day when mine eventually fails. Anyway, the advice to you is to search the usual NOS part supply places, or even just go to Nissan and see what they list.
    • Have you got a pic of the actuator? My guess is that unit has failed internally and was flopping around, so the previous engineer who owned it forced it to be fully open to cold air (blocking the heater core path). As far as you can tell, is anything else wrong in the system? Likely you just need a new actuator (not sure how available they are) and then "installation is the reverse of disassembly"
    • I'm happy with the Lsailt unit that I put in, it puts full Android on the top screen so you can run whatever Nav and other Apps you want, while still existing inside the factory functionality like automatic reverse cams, audio input switching, retains factory bluetooth etc. Not cheap and the install was moderate (not simple, not hard) Yours is a V36 not V37 though right?
    • Yeap, all the NC's that I originally looked at that had a hard top were PRHT, which makes the roof line look horrible, hence why I said nope to them My only caveat for another MX5 was it needed to have a hard top, and initially I didn't think you could get a detachable hard top for the NC,  like my NB had Again, a big thanks to Matty for helping me source the detachable hard top for my little girl, they are as rare as hens teeth in Australia, and the few people who have them, keep them Also to Greg, for initially pointing me in the NC direction NC PRHT 🤢🤮 Not mine (I really should take more photos of my car), but a NC with the detachable hard top 😁 To me, the difference in how the detachable hard top roof line looks, and how it actually follows the bodies lines, like they do on NA's and NB's, is chalk and cheese compared to the bulbous looking PRHT  
×
×
  • Create New...