Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Thanks SK,

Is that 475hp x .75 = 350kw at the fly? Allowing for losses atw that would equate to the 280 rwkw you mentioned.

Good, your calculator works the same as mine, which I have checked by running the engine up on the engine dyno and the chassis dyno. Can't afford to have an unverified calculator.

Your comment that 'anything over 475 hp costs the same' makes sense.

No only makes sense, but is in fact true.

But assuming the $ for a bullet proof engine aren't available and if a stock RB26 can make 280rwkw safely, why go to an RB26/30 except for a bit more torque (and a fair bit more messing about to install it). Is it the cost? What am I missing?    

I would never suggest taking a perfectly good RB26 out and replacing it with a standard internals RB30. That would be pretty damn silly. But if you have an RB20, or an RB25, or a badly stuffed RB26 bottom end, then it makes perfect sense. It will cost less and give a much higher average power.

What rpm limit do you observe for the stocker bottom end?

Irrelevant question really, the limit is 475 bhp, so reving a standard internals RB30 over 6,500 rpm is a waste of time. And they make so much average power (at that max power level) it is actually slowing the car's acceleration by reving it too far. Around 7,000 rpm is OK and 7,500 rpm, if it is balanced well. But if it is still making power at 7,000 rpm, then it is making over 600 bhp and you have exceeded the 475 bhp limit anyway.

Hope that answered your questions:cheers:

ok so say i still want to stick to the ol rb20 style engine but use gtr crank and rods to make it a 2.4...

what else am i looking at internally to reliably run 260-300rwkw?

deffinately going to be a limiter hitting engine as its being built for drift purposes...

- adz

4AGZE pistons are factory forged so they should be ok if the tune is good id think.

Rods and crank are ok, just get it all balanced up, and use a builder who knows his stuff :(

Sorry Scooby just want to add my 2c:

SK:

Good, your calculator works the same as mine, which I have checked by running the engine up on the engine dyno and the chassis dyno. Can't afford to have an unverified calculator.

I think he was trying to clarify if it was 475 fly or atw, I don't believe your original post specified. But he should probably make sure he keeps that calc if it agrees with your dyno LOL! J/K

I would never suggest taking a perfectly good RB26 out and replacing it with a standard internals RB30. That would be pretty damn silly.

I was considering doing exactly that given the support I've read for this conversion, the apparently low cost and the impressive results people such as 88 (above) achieve. But I think I'm clear on that now.

Irrelevant question really, the limit is 475 bhp, so reving a standard internals RB30 over 6,500 rpm is a waste of time. And they make so much average power (at that max power level) it is actually slowing the car's acceleration by reving it too far. Around 7,000 rpm is OK and 7,500 rpm, if it is balanced well. But if it is still making power at 7,000 rpm, then it is making over 600 bhp and you have exceeded the 475 bhp limit anyway.

I didn't think it was that irrelevant given the discussion that sometimes surrounds rev limits for the RB26/30 but there is no question in my mind now.

Thanks SK :(

  • 2 months later...

I too would like to go the 2.2 or 2.4ltr option.....

I have heard that the RB20 rev's to some spastic Redline!

Another thing is..... I dunno if you guys are with me but i could not sacrifice the soud of my car for more power! How dramatically did the sound change with theses engines?

my redline on my rb30det with the std rb25de non turbo cams still makes power till up to 7000rpm. The redline is set to 7200....a set of cams and it can still rev like my old rb20 did, but it has more power now off boost than the rb20 did on.....gimme a pm some time, and ill show you if you like ;)

Simply slapping more cubes under the same head (valve & cam size etc) will cause the motor to rev less.

It will make its peak power earlier and drop power earlier resulting in the feeling of it doesn't want to rev out as much.

The RB25 head has bigger ports and valves, this will result in a motor that wants to rev harder than your 2.4ltr under a rb20det head that has 5mm per inlet valve less diamater.

Over both valves thats a 10mm diamater difference. No wonder the rb20det valves look like little baby toy valves next to the rb25 head. ;)

For drift that often see's over rev's I would seriously look at getting yourself a R32 RB25DE block, GTR pistons (possibly forged), rods and crank, adapt the piston oil squirters if you are going to use stock pistons.

It will be a much much better drift motor vs the rb23/rb24det.

It will rev harder, spool earlier and make more average and peak power. Not to mention it will be much more reliable as you wont need massive cams and huge rev's to make the power.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • After my last update, I went ahead with cleaning and restoring the entire fuel system. This included removing the tank and cleaning it with the Beyond Balistics solution, power washing it multiple times, drying it thoroughly, rinsing with IPA, drying again with heat gun and compressed air. Also, cleaning out the lines, fuel rail, and replacing the fuel pump with an OEM-style one. During the cleaning process, I replaced several hoses - including the breather hose on the fuel tank, which turned out to be the cause of the earlier fuel leak. This is what the old fuel filter looked like: Fuel tank before cleaning: Dirty Fuel Tank.mp4   Fuel tank after cleaning (some staining remains): Clean Fuel Tank.mp4 Both the OEM 270cc and new DeatschWerks 550cc injectors were cleaned professionally by a shop. Before reassembling everything, I tested the fuel flow by running the pump output into a container at the fuel filter location - flow looked good. I then fitted the new fuel filter and reassembled the rest of the system. Fuel Flow Test.mp4 Test 1 - 550cc injectors Ran the new fuel pump with its supplied diagonal strainer (different from OEM’s flat strainer) and my 550cc injectors using the same resized-injector map I had successfully used before. At first, it idled roughly and stalled when I applied throttle. Checked the spark plugs and found that they were fouled with carbon (likely from the earlier overly rich running when the injectors were clogged). After cleaning the plugs, the car started fine. However, it would only idle for 30–60 seconds before stalling, and while driving it would feel like a “fuel cut” after a few seconds - though it wouldn’t fully stall. Test 2 – Strainer swap Suspecting the diagonal strainer might not be reaching the tank bottom, I swapped it for the original flat strainer and filled the tank with ~45L of fuel. The issue persisted exactly the same. Test 3 – OEM injectors To eliminate tuning variables, I reinstalled the OEM 270cc injectors and reverted to the original map. Cleaned the spark plugs again just in-case. The stalling and “fuel cut” still remained.   At this stage, I suspect an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, caused during the cleaning process. This has led me to look into getting Frenchy’s fuel hanger and replacing the unit entirely. TL;DR: Cleaned and restored the fuel system (tank, lines, rail, pump). Tested 550cc injectors with the same resized-injector map as before, but the car stalls at idle and experiences what feels like “fuel cut” after a few seconds of driving. Swapped back to OEM injectors with original map to rule out tuning, but the issue persists. Now suspecting an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, possibly cause by the cleaning process.  
    • For race cars, this is one part where I find having the roll cage bar having gone through a hole in the floor better than the build it up on a ledge inside... The Merc I help on, the main hoop ends are marked on the car, and the jack is marked... Jack goes under a few inches and lifts one whole side of the car up... Removes that fight for long slim jacks for race car duties!   My biggest issue for the daily drivers I work on, is my jacks don't go high enough. The jacks start out on a few blocks, jack it up, then start a second jack under it on more blocks, and then I can get an axle stand under it. My axle stands are presently in use, and are nearly fully extended. The car is sitting with barely more than a cm of clearance to get the wheel off the studs! Sarah's Kluger is the same, as it has an ungodly amount of droop available in the suspension and a distinct lack of good jacking points!
    • Happy? Yep, my to do list is getting shorter and shorter. Either this light approaching is the end of the tunnel, or I'm about to be hit by a train... Ha ha ha   Also, Duncan isn't that far out of town that you need to make a multi day drive out of it. 😛
    • Sorry I meant that we are building the EH for a client.
    • LOL, when one "money pit" is never enough Noice, and excellent work mate
×
×
  • Create New...