Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Everyone,

I'm about to get my GTR tuned up and was wondering what the differences are b/w using a 2WD vs a 4WD dyno.

I rang Shaun from Boost Worx (2WD) and he said the power figures would be slightly different but the rest would make no difference. Michael from Turbo Tune (4WD) stated their would be a difference but didn't elaborate and the chick (she didn't give a name) from Tillbrooks (4WD) said that I'd want to do it on a 4WD dyno.

Interestingly Shaun quoted $145, Michael $250, and Tillbrooks up to $500 depending on the computer.

Thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/72595-gtr-tune-up-on-a-2wd-dyno/
Share on other sites

You should really do it on a 4WD dyno as the car acts differently between 2 and 4 wheel drive. The stresses are different in AWD against the engine. I am about to jump on the dyna-pac at Speedworks. A full retune of the standard computer along with dyno time should be about the $500 mark.

?? the 4WD only works when theres traction loss..... so wouldnt a 4WD dyno be useless. as the front wheels wouldnt engage. correct me if im wrong...and if i am then wouldnt a 2WD dyno be totally wrong to test on as it would launch the car off the dyno once the front wheels engage. ???

?? the 4WD only works when theres traction loss..... so wouldnt a 4WD dyno be useless. as the front wheels wouldnt engage. correct me if im wrong...and if i am then wouldnt a 2WD dyno be totally wrong to test on as it would launch the car off the dyno once the front wheels engage. ???

Actually the front wheels engage not so much under traction loss but at high g-forces. When you put your foot down hard it kicks the front in to assist in traction - not letting it get to the stage of slip in the first place. If there is traction loss it assists depending on other factors of the car (lateral forces, steering position, throttle position, etc...)

You can disengage the front wheel drive by removing the fuse to the attesa, making it a purely RWD car - required for 2WD dynos.

Actually the front wheels engage not so much under traction loss but at high g-forces. When you put your foot down hard it kicks the front in to assist in traction - not letting it get to the stage of slip in the first place. If there is traction loss it assists depending on other factors of the car (lateral forces, steering position, throttle position, etc...)

You can disengage the front wheel drive by removing the fuse to the attesa, making it a purely RWD car - required for 2WD dynos.

you car only "pull the fuse " on R 32

R 33,R 34 have 10% drive to the front all time

The trick is to lift the coin tray, undo a nut at the front of the G senser

and lift it up to about 30 degrees to make 4 wheel drive work all the time

jeff

2wd or 4wd..

Unless its a super high powered GTR that does not get traction in rwd on a rwd dyno then there should be no difference on the load that is put on the motor. If it aint spinning on the dyno in rwd then 4wd won't put any more load on the motor that is going to affect the tune. If load affected the tune that much then all cars would be tuned in 5th.

On the R32 you can either remove the fuse or drop the front shaft, R33 you have to drop the front shaft.

I would lean towards Boostworx and Tilbrooks. I've had experience with all 3 work shops.

Tilbrooks are excellent and have the PowerFC software, Shaun simply does his wizard thing with the hand controller.

I currently use Shaun @ Boostworx.

My car is tuned on a 2wd dyno all the time as is the RacePace GTR.

The only real difference you'll see b/w the 2wd and the 4wd dyno is the power reading. A 2wd dyno will give a higher reading due to drive train losses through the 4wd system.

Last year at AutoSalon, my car ran 593awkw whereas in 2WD it ran 617rwkw. This time round we made 604awkw and 608rwkw. The 608rwkw was not indicative of the power simply due to wheelspin. After 3 tries and 500kgs ballast, we still couldn't get traction on the rollers so we gave up.

The tuning of a GTR whether it be on a 2wd or 4wd is irrelevant as all your changing is the mapping of the engine itself.

33 and 34 GTRs always have power going to the front wheels. The front shaft should be dropped out from the transfer case when tuning. It's a simple 5 min job involving 4 bolts.

Explain from a technical point of view why it is pointless?

or do you not know why?

So what your saying is a Rb26DETT in a RWD GTST should first be tuned in a GTR or GTS4 then dropped in to the RWD as its pointless tuning it in rwd?!?

i think he's an "armchair tuner"...

My car is tuned on a 2wd dyno all the time as is the RacePace GTR.

The only real difference you'll see b/w the 2wd and the 4wd dyno is the power reading.  A 2wd dyno will give a higher reading due to drive train losses through the 4wd system.

Last year at AutoSalon, my car ran 593awkw whereas in 2WD it ran 617rwkw.  This time round we made 604awkw and 608rwkw.  The 608rwkw was not indicative of the power simply due to wheelspin.  After 3 tries and 500kgs ballast, we still couldn't get traction on the rollers so we gave up.

The tuning of a GTR whether it be on a 2wd or 4wd is irrelevant as all your changing is the mapping of the engine itself.

33 and 34 GTRs always have power going to the front wheels.  The front shaft should be dropped out from the transfer case when tuning.  It's a simple 5 min job involving 4 bolts.

Finally someone who knows what they are talking about

Okay, so after reading all this it seems that there is no real difference in the mapping etc of a GTR on a 2WD dyno vs a 4WD dyno but the rwkW figures will be slightly higher.

Have I got this right?

Cubes, any reason why you wouldn't recommend Turbo Tune?

Okay, so after reading all this it seems that there is no real difference in the mapping etc of a GTR on a 2WD dyno vs a 4WD dyno but the rwkW figures will be slightly higher.

Have I got this right?

Cubes, any reason why you wouldn't recommend Turbo Tune?

True and correct. Lock it in Eddie.

  • 3 weeks later...
My car is tuned on a 2wd dyno all the time as is the RacePace GTR.

The only real difference you'll see b/w the 2wd and the 4wd dyno is the power reading.  A 2wd dyno will give a higher reading due to drive train losses through the 4wd system.

Last year at AutoSalon, my car ran 593awkw whereas in 2WD it ran 617rwkw.  This time round we made 604awkw and 608rwkw.  The 608rwkw was not indicative of the power simply due to wheelspin.  After 3 tries and 500kgs ballast, we still couldn't get traction on the rollers so we gave up.

The tuning of a GTR whether it be on a 2wd or 4wd is irrelevant as all your changing is the mapping of the engine itself.

33 and 34 GTRs always have power going to the front wheels.  The front shaft should be dropped out from the transfer case when tuning.  It's a simple 5 min job involving 4 bolts.

I love your car...it looks hot...did you happen to be driving on Princes Highway towards Dandenong on Tuesday night? I was in a R32 GTR

I tell you...midnight purple looks hot at night.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • From my youth: GTi-R clutch change is a massive pain. The gearboxes are fragile? But the car is super cool and I want one 😢 
    • Remember this is 1988 tech.
    • Driveline vibration is resolved. I ended up loosening all my engine mount and trans mount bolts, giving it a good shake then retightening everything and it's gone... Let's just say I was surprised that fixed it.  I've been happily driving it around again but unfortunately put zero time into my direct port/constant pressure WMI setup. I'm on vacation next week, so I'll try and finalize it then.  On a different note, I spent all week fuel/ignition mapping 2x 216L V16 engines. Turbo's were burning glycol and we swapped them out for larger units. We also had planned emissions testing on site, so I figured I'd be there the same week to use their instrumentation and massage any emissions issues out if needed. This was a first for me. Fuel management is similar in certain ways to automotive (i.e air density as load variable) but very different in others. It's all PLC based and AFR's are controlled by air and not fuel. They use a control valve between the turbo and air manifold to control pressure which in turn controls AFR's. Due to this, target AFR tables supplied by the OEM are in pressures and not mass which really through me off. They use air pressure vs fuel pressure tables. I also relied on an O2 concentration sensor the emissions team had in the exhaust. Ignition timing was also all over the place and we were losing a fair bit of power. They're now happily sitting at 16-40BTDC depending on load. We were making about 1600kw at 900rpm at 90% load. Engines were running a lot smoother as well.    
    • heh, aint no R32 ever meeting modern targa cage rules unless the driver is veeeery short OP, good luck with the sale, since its already in the land of freedom I'm sure you will find a good buyer.
    • meh, it was a good video, clear about the issue and how he dealt with it. A bit heavy on the RTV and very brave to put an RB in anything without rebuilding it first, but otherwise I thought it was good Dose, I'm not sure that having the pickup forward is a big issue; yes of course the oil could shift under brakes but the sump should never be empty enough for that to be a problem (unless you also have a higher volume oil pump, and that oil can't return from the head to the sump quickly enough)
×
×
  • Create New...