Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I know a few of you have used him for shoots just wondering what you thought of his work how much he charges and how did you get in contact with him ? just had a quick look at his web site and couldnt find any details. Want to take a few happy snaps before my baby leaves me for good :boohoo:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/72702-httpwwweastonchangcom/
Share on other sites

:wavey: I'm a mate of his.

His work is amazing. Brilliant. Check out the current issue of speed. He shot the cover car. Shot a total of 5 cars for that one issue.

All amazing shots. His dynamic shots are unbelievable.

Speed use him frequently, as does Motor and Wheels.

email him: [email protected]

I personally am not a fan of his work. Uses photoshop and too many tools to edit the photos too much. If you refer to almost all of his work in magazines, there's rarely just a normal shot of the car. I've know of two people who has used him, and weren't too impressed as there weren't many "normal" clean shots of the overall car.

I personally don't like the arty type work either... however, if you like his styles of photos, then you should use him and get photos of your car :O:):( He's certainly a very very successfull photographer, and is better than most photographers I know, I just don't like his 'style'.

I personally am not a fan of his work.  Uses photoshop and too many tools to edit the photos too much.  If you refer to almost all of his work in magazines, there's rarely just a normal shot of the car.  I've know of two people who has used him, and weren't too impressed as there weren't many "normal" clean shots of the overall car.

I personally don't like the arty type work either... however, if you like his styles of photos, then you should use him and get photos of your car :P:):D  He's certainly a very very successfull photographer, and is better than most photographers I know, I just don't like his 'style'.

if you want a normal shot of the car just take the photo yourself and save yourself the money...

I personally am not a fan of his work.  Uses photoshop and too many tools to edit the photos too much.  If you refer to almost all of his work in magazines, there's rarely just a normal shot of the car.  I've know of two people who has used him, and weren't too impressed as there weren't many "normal" clean shots of the overall car.

I personally don't like the arty type work either... however, if you like his styles of photos, then you should use him and get photos of your car :P:):D  He's certainly a very very successfull photographer, and is better than most photographers I know, I just don't like his 'style'.

ok... now I just have to let ya know he does NOT use photoshop much at all. His motion shots are real, not photoshopped.

I've witnessed him take photo's in real life. Have you?

He shot my car for tunerzine.com. I'm a fan of his work, and it appears that so is SPEED and Motor. He shot 5 cars for the last issue of SPEED, and got the cover car.

I wish I was in his shoes. He's as pro as pro can be.

ok... now I just have to let ya know he does NOT use photoshop much at all. His motion shots are real, not photoshopped.  

I've witnessed him take photo's in real life. Have you?

He shot my car for tunerzine.com. I'm a fan of his work, and it appears that so is SPEED and Motor. He shot 5 cars for the last issue of SPEED, and got the cover car.

I wish I was in his shoes. He's as pro as pro can be.

in my opinion its all shutter speeds that are used when his shooting this requires a bit of talent with the lens . there are somethings that photoshop cant duplicate without being obvious.

Hi guys,

My name is Dean Summers. I currently shoot for Fast Fours, Autosalon, Speed and MaxPower Magazine.

I find Easton's work fresh and very creative.

Considering Easton's has only been doing professional photography for a short time, he's doing extremely well. Magazine editors just done by anyones photos.

I know a number of photographers including myself appriciate his tallent with and without the use of photoshop.

I utilise photoshop if I think it will give that extra feel/mood to the photo.

My two cents...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • @robbo_rb180 I already have a NEO head on the shitbox 😎 Just needs beehive springs so I can rev it past the 8600 rpm limiter, then again pointless too, turbo is out of puff lol. Wen da gods let me win lotto eh?
    • Everyone I know with a90 supra at time attack aren't having issues with 3-5 fast laps so far and one is decent powered one too. Saw a k24 swapped 86 with a 8hp70 and big slicks and aero which had no drama's at QR and Manton Park. I've stuck a 25 row cooler in my setup with 8hp45/50 in the hopes of keeping the oil cool as I plan on some racing next year that 20-30min sessions. I've also geared my car so won't be using 7th and 8th gear too. @Dose Pipe Sutututu just needs to get that samsonas in already and have that tassie guy fit a head and rev it too 11ty thousand rpm. 
    • My embedded systems thoughts have me sitting with GTS on this. Variation between same phone hardware, should be small. However, the internal "intensity" or "volume" amount that say Google passes to the app, will be quite different, as the underlying hardware will be passing different levels for the same volume to the Google OS. Until the app creator has had each individual phone, and set benchmarks and calibrations for each, the amount of error can be quite huge.   It can even be observed by using different phones, recording the same noise, and then playing it back, they end up soon ding different. A big reason for it, is even the different types of mics used in phones have different responses, and different frequency ranges. Then you need to get into the DSP, and the variations in those, their sample rates which then effect their frequency range, and then the quality of the DSP, and what type of hardware conversion they do to for the ADC within the DSP. Oh, and let's not forget at the low level phones are designed to cutout loud sounds. It's one of the reasons they suck in really loud environments (eg concerts). The louder you yell, the more you'll get cutout too Note DSP is Digital Signal Processor ADC is the analogue to data converter. I don't have any real data on what the variation would truly be, however, chat GPT says in general, their output is typically between +/-2dB to +/-5dB of what you're really measuring. So realistically, anything from 4 to 10dB variation is possible even with the same devices.
    • 'sif the error will be that low!
    • I do know where there is a fair few 😉
×
×
  • Create New...