Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Guest two.06l
two.06l: why didn't you tell me this when i pm'ed you the other day about his clutches - i just sent mine up there to get built!!

Because I had this built for one of our customers....only to discover yesterday that he has a PUSH type clutch. I would have sold it to you otherwise. Im in this game to help not hinder.

how would this compare to a exedy 3 puck ceramic ? (cause its around the same price )

Would actually prefer a twin plate but dont have that kind of money right now so I was going to go with the above mentioned clutch to see how long it holds out.

I'll take a guess at answering these questions but don't take my word for it.

Single plate, probably around 3300-3400 pounds clamping pressure. Probably rebuilt from a standard GTR clutch (or maybe a excedy HD clutch)

HP hard to say, If its the same clutch that DIRTgarage use it, they run over 400rwkw :D

Hope this helps (and hope its right :( )

Guest two.06l
I'll take a guess at answering these questions but don't take my word for it.

Single plate, probably around 3300-3400 pounds clamping pressure. Probably rebuilt from a standard GTR clutch (or maybe a excedy HD clutch)

HP hard to say, If its the same clutch that DIRTgarage use it, they run over 400rwkw :D

Hope this helps (and hope its right :( )

Brand new modified excedy 10" pressure plate (standard GTR is 9.5"), carbotic 5 or 6 puck sprung centre. It has been setup and tested in house at Race Clutch, and is developing around 4500lb of clamping force. We have used the same clutch in our race car for nearly two seasons, and can't speak any more highly enough of its performance/longetivity. Our car is producing 411awkw and 467rwkw so it can certainly do its job.

p.s. please pm for more info.

Would it be a straight fit into my R33 gtr?

Im looking at making around 380rwkw, do u think it will hold up?

Just askin cause I had a exedy single plate with 3400 tonne pressure, 5 puk button and it only lasted 6 weeks. I've been told I will need a twin plate to hold up with the power I'll will be makin.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to !
    • As I've said elsewhere, I am using the stock intercooler piping path in the engine bay, and a return flow cooler, and making ~250 rwkW (without any effort put into trying to turn it up past there just yet) and expect to be able to make some more, and frankly, I would be perfectly happy with 260-270rwKW. This is peak road Skyline usability territory. You go past there and, sure, the car will snap necks more when it's on boost, but it will also break shit all the time, cost a (even larger) fortune in tyres, etc etc. Anyway, I also do not like the over-the-fan pipe path, and you don't have to do it.
    • I see, honestly I’m not too fussed about the looks. The only reason to go plenum is to make the piping easier instead of the classic over the rad etc. 
    • Not easy to quantify wrt something like how many fractions of a second slower it would be over 0-100. But given that a 250-300rwkW car is able to do that launch sprint in 5-6 sec (and faster with appropriate tyres, and surface)..... giving up as much as a second would feel like torture. A ~450HP capable turbo is not going to make lots of boost in the 2000-3000 rpm range. So, whilst with some boost on hand it will be faster accelerating in that rev range than your engine currently is NA, it will not feel like a fast car until the boost is solidly in. You know what your car feels like right now when you open it up at 2000rpm. if you've ever been in an actual fast car, you will appreciate that the NARB25 is.... not exciting. Well, add some boost and it will be better. But shorten the intake runners and it might not be better at all. It might come out better, but it could end up feeling the same. For me, it's not the 0-X km/h sprints that matter. It is easy to fry the tyres with anything over 200 rwkW. You can't use all the power available in 1st and 2nd anyway, you have to modulate the throttle. What matters is how the car reacts when you're driving in traffic in 4th or 5th and have maybe 2000 rpm on board, and you want/need to add some speed quickly, and don't have time for the downshift. It won't make boost, it will be all NA (at the speeds we're talking about - remember how fast you're going at 2000 in 4th! and don't plan on breaking the limit by too much.) So giving away NA torque is not what I would consider practical for a street car. And retaining that NA torque builds boost faster which makes the car faster. The flashy plenum is not actually better, unless you're looking at a track car where you can keep it on the boil all the time.  
    • So how much difference does it make you think? Like 1 second in the 0-100?  I was have smaller turbo so hopefully that spools quick GTX2871.  currently it’s NA so you can imagine pretty slow, but I do want fast accusation a little as there’s not many places I’ll be driving where I go over 80 even near me. So 0-60 and 0-80 targets   
×
×
  • Create New...